What do you mean by "ethics" in this context? Freedom (negative rights) and the right to a remedy (positive rights) may they ever be in conflict?

Workable ethical theories: 1. - Kantianism 2. Act Utilitarianism 3. Rule Utilitarianism 4. Social Contract Theory Pick two theories from your list and describe two similarities and two differences between them

Just what is the meaning of ethics? To define what is right and wrong in the realm of IT, it is necessary to first explain the relevance of IT and then to reach a conclusion.

What exactly do we mean when we say "ethics"? Can claim rights, which are positive rights, and freedoms, which are negative rights, ever be in a scenario where they directly contradict with one another?

What do we mean precisely when we term "ethics"? Can rights—which are positive rights—and freedoms—which are negative rights—ever find themselves in a situation where they are in direct conflict with one another?

Just what does the term "ethics" entail? Could there ever be a situation where positive claim rights and negative freedoms directly conflict with one another?

What are the consequences of seeing human rights as just aesthetic as a moral component of scientific and technological development?