Use the Pl decision rule to decide if the project should be accepted or rejected? -38.88 percent, reject 0.39 percent, accept 38.88 percent, accept 0.39 percent, reject

What happens when "pet" projects do not have the requisite NPV or IRR? Do pet projects seem to be approved over other more viable projects? Why does this happen?

Which of the following were listed as potential Problems or Issues associated with Using a Rate of Return Approach to justifying single or multiple Mutually Exclusive projects? Note: This is a Multiple Answer question. Please select all of the following options you think are correct? O The ROR calculations are typically more complex than the PW, AW, or FW methods and frequently require the use of trial and error techniques. O You cannot rely on the best Mutually Exclusive project to have the highest ROR. O An incremental approach is required to reliably determine the best project when comparing multiple Mutually Exclusive projects with the ROR approach. O This method assumes that any net positive cash flows are reinvested at the ROR rate. If the ROR rate is substantially larger than MARR, this might not be a realistic assumption. OFor any sequence of Net Cash Flows with more than one sign chance over the life of the project there may be more than one ROR value that satisfies the Rate…

29....When using the NPV method the decision making rationale includes the following (select all that apply): a.If projects are mutually exclusive, accept the project with the highest positive NPV. b.If projects are independent, accept if the project NPV<0. c.If projects are independent, accept if the project NPV>0 d.If the projects are mutually exclusive, accept the project with lowest NPV.