Use the AS-AD model to describe the crowding-out effect of private investment occurring when the government decides to decrease taxation (T). Your analysis should include the AS-AD, IS-LM, and the money market graph.

A. Suppose you are given the following fixed-price Keynesian model: C=280 + 0.9Y. I-200 G=100 X3D200 M= 100 + 0.1Y. T= 100 a. Find the aggregate expenditure function. b. Find the equilibrium level of real GDP. C. What is the spending multiolier in this model? Tax multiplier? d. Show that leakages injections at equilibrium. e. If taxes increase by $100, what is the new equilibrium level of GDP? E. Show your answers to b) and e) graphically.

Consider a 4-sector Keynesian model like that discussed in class with the following characteristics: exogenous consumption=2000, exogenous taxation=100, government spending=1000, exports=400, planned investment=400. The marginal propensity to save=20%, the marginal tax rate=20% and the marginal propensity to import=40%. The potential output for this economy is 6000. Note that import demand depends on disposable income. a) At its short run equilibrium, this economy is experiencing __________ (a contractionary/an expansionary) gap of __________ (round to 2 decimal places) b) Following the outbreak of a pandemic in the above economy, exogenous consumption falls to 1000 and the marginal propensity to save increases to 40%. In order for this economy to experience a zero output gap, government spending must ____________ (increase/decrease) by ____________ . Assume all other quantities remain unchanged

Respond to the question with a concise and accurate answer, along with a clear explanation and step-by-step solution, or risk receiving a downvote.

YAS = 742 + 15 P- 28Poil YAD = 478 - 45P + 18G Suppose initially, the Poil = $93 per barrel and government spending is equal to $630. %3D Part (a): Calculate equilibrium GDP and the price level. Part (b): Determine the magnitude of the multiplier if oil prices exogenously rise by $1. Part (c): Using 2 to 3 sentences, provide a theoretical explanation for why the multiplier you calculated in part (b) is smaller (in absolute value) than the simple multiplier. Hint: you should be mentioning how the price level impacts AE and AD variables. Part (d): Determine the magnitude of the multiplier if government spending exogenously increases by $1. Part (e): Using 2 to 3 sentences, provide a theoretical explanation for why the multiplier you calculated in part (d) is smaller than the simple multiplier. Hint: you should be mentioning how the price level impacts AE and AD variables.

Help!!

Some liken quantitative easing to that of directing a firehose of money to emerging economies that cannot manage the cash, while others worry that the flood of cash has encourages reckless financial behavior. What specific types of "reckless" financial behavior comes from quantitative easing and by whom?   Which measure will reduce employment best: government tax reduction, or increased government spending? Can you compare the multiplier effect of a tax reduction versus the multiplier effect of an increase in government spending? There are TWO formulas. Which of the two will have a bigger impact in the economy and why based on the two formulas? Using the formulas, figure this out: If $30 billion in new investment is added to the economy and MPC is 0.9, how much would the national income (GDP) increase by?

Questions attached below

Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.

Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.