Question
use IRAC
A merchant ordered a shipment of leather overseas. As a result of the pandemic, the owner of
the vessel who had docked at a port, sold the leather to another person who badly needed the
goods in the area he had docked the ship.
With reference to case law, advise the merchant and the owner of the vessel. Would your answer
be different if he was shipping fruits?
SAVE
AI-Generated Solution
info
AI-generated content may present inaccurate or offensive content that does not represent bartleby’s views.
Unlock instant AI solutions
Tap the button
to generate a solution
to generate a solution
Click the button to generate
a solution
a solution
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- a 45 year old patient was under doctor care for the past twenty years for chronic arthritis, trying many different drugs without success. A new drug appeared having been ceritifed by health canada and the doctor explained that like all the rest, the drug would have a range of side effects, among which was possible depression. The patient took the drug and within a week suffered a mood swing and committed suicide. Concerned by this new and two other cases, Health Canada suspended the drug from Canada, pending durtehr review. The family of deceased sued the paharmaceautical maker and Health Canada. Aside form issues of the doctor's possible professional liability, discuss the issues of manufacturer's liability and negligence raised in this scenarioarrow_forwardWhat is the Parol Evidence Rule? Please describe one circumstance in which you believe the rule should be followed and why? Please describe a circumstance in which you believe the rule should not be followed and why? Please not, this is business law question. Thank you.arrow_forwardPollution remediation obligations should be recognized if which of the following obligating events has occurred? Multiple Choice A violation of a pollution prevention permit has occurred. All of the given items are obligating events that would require recognition of a pollution remediation obligation. The government is compelled to take remediation action due to imminent endangerment to the public health. The government is named or will be named as the responsible or potentially responsible party to a remediation.arrow_forward
- A transit officer sees a 2-year-old child walking along the edge of a train station by herself. The officer realizes that it looks strange and dangerous that she is walking very close to the edge. While the child is standing next to the officer she prepares to jump onto the tracks. The officer could have could have grabbed her and pulled her back onto the platform, but he chose not to do so. Unfortunately, the child gets hit by a train and dies. The parents, were nearby and didn’t notice that their child walked away from them, sue the officer and the city for damages. What is the probable outcome of their suit? What if it wasn’t an officer but just another rider on the subway?arrow_forwardCan legal gambling have any harmful effects? Describe a form of legal gambling that takes place and some of its harmful effects. If it is harmful why is it allowed in the first place? Is there a way to mitigate these harmful effects?arrow_forwardWhy do facts matter when it comes to warranties either implied or expressed?arrow_forward
- which of the following is considered an Unfair Trade Practice under Florida law? A) Abandonment B) Coercion C) Consequential Damage D) Waiverarrow_forwardBoth diverted and gray-market merchandise are "real" products from the manufacturer (as opposed to counterfeit merchandise which is a knock off and not made from the legitimate, copyrighted or trademark owner), however, when products are sold to unauthorized retailers by third parties, the products are then considered to be diverted or gray-market. Is it True or False?arrow_forwardJimmyCorps places several Facebook ads claiming that his magic tonic protects consumers from coronavirus. Harvey places an order for 50 gallons of the magic tonic to protect himself and his family. Meanwhile, the New York Attorney General commences prosecution of JimmyCorps for fraud—his magic tonic is simply a gallon of bleach, and consumers who have purchased it have become gravely ill or died. Still, JimmyCorps sues Harvey when Harvey refuses to pay for the 50 gallons of tonic he ordered. Can a judge force Harvey to pay JimmyCorps? Why or why not? Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.arrow_forward
- Laws referenced and type of law used in the Uber Technologies, Inc. v. Heller (2020) casearrow_forwardA local builder offers to place with you insurance on every house he/she builds while it is under construction. In return, he/she wants you to allow him/her 20 % discount off the premium required by insurers. How would you respond to comply with RIBO Regulations? OA) You can only allow a five percent (5%) discount because of your overhead and expenses. OB) You will pay the builder a flat $10.00 fee for each house, but it is contrary to RIBO Regulations to discount the premium. OC) You refuse to pay the builder anything, since it would contravene RIBO Regulations. OD) You offer the builder a 20% premium refund for those houses that have no claims while under construction.arrow_forwardThe U.S Supreme Court requires that any condemned property must be put into use for the general public. True Falsearrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios