Related questions
Understand the running order of 7 functions O(1), O(n log n), O(n), O(n2 ), O(n3 ), O(log n), O(an ).
1.2. For a given function, compute the asymptotic upper bound using “big-Oh” notation.
Examples:
• f(n) = 100n3 − 7n3 + 14n2
• f(n) = 100n3 − 100n3 + 7n2
• f(n) = .001n3 +100·2n
• f(n) = n log n + n/5
• f(n) = n log n + n2
The asymptotic upper bound of a function, often denoted using "big-Oh" notation (O()), can be defined in such a way that it describes the higher restriction of ways the characteristic's runtime or useful resource usage grows because the entered size turns into very massive. It affords a higher certainty of the worst-case performance of a set of rules or functions.
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Step by stepSolved in 3 steps
- Master theorem: if n< d T(n) = |aT(n/b)+ f (n) if n2 d 1. if f(n) is O(n - ), then T(n) is O(nos") 2. if f(n) is O(n' 3. if f(n) is 2(n® provided af (n/b)S (n) for some 8arrow_forwardSuppose that f (n) = 0(g(n)) and f(n) = 0(h(n)), then it is ( always / sometimes / never ) the case that g(n) = 0(h(n)).arrow_forwardDesign an iterative function Collatz(n,k) that computes the k^th number in the hailstone sequence starting at n: Collatz(n,k)= { c(c(c(...c(n)...))) }<----- k iterationsarrow_forwardConsider a sequence of integers defined by the following recurrence: f(0) = 0, f(1) = 1, and f(i) = f(i – 1) + f([i/2]) for i > 2. We would like to compute f(n) using DP. If we use bottom-up approach, what is the running time? Explain how you obtained your answer. (Assume every basic operation such as plus takes O(1) time as usual.) Give a pseudo-code for a top-down approach with memoization.arrow_forward1. Find the asymptotic upper (big O), lower (Omega) and tight (Theta) bound for the following functions: A. n+ 10 B. 6 +n + log(n) C. 4 log (log (n)) + 5 D. [(n² + 1) (n² + 2)]/(n² + 4)arrow_forwardThe factorial function f(n) = n! is defined by n! = 1 2 3... n whenever n is a positive integer, and O! = 1. Provide big-O estimates for the factorial function and the logarithm of the factorial function. As an illustration, 1! = 1, 2! = 1 2=2, 3! = 1 23 = 6, and 4! = 1 234=24.Take note of how quickly the function n! expands. Consider the following: 20! = 2,432,902,008,176,640,000.arrow_forwardAnother recursive algorithm is applied to some data A = (a₁, ..., am) where m = 2* (i.e. 2, 4, 8,16 ...) where x is an integer ≥ 1. The running time T is characterised using the following recurrence equations: T(1) = c when the size of A is 1 T(m) = 2T (2) + c otherwise Determine the running time complexity of this algorithm.arrow_forwardPLEASE explain how to solve this STEP BY STEParrow_forwardWrite the following functions in ascending order of growth rate. That is, if function g(n) immediately follows function f(n) in your list, then it should be the case that f(n) = O(g(n)). fi (n) = 5" f2 (n)=lg(n5) f3 (n) = ( 2 ) 5 √n f4 (n) = n5 fs (n) = n! fe (n) = lg (n)arrow_forwardConsider this function:boolean freaky(n) {// PRE: n is a positive integer// POST: ???if n < 2: return falsex = 2while x < n { if n mod x == 0 return false x = x + 1}return true}(i) Find the postcondition of this function(ii) Find the best possible big-oh bound for its complexity(iii) What can we say about big-thetacomplexity for this function?arrow_forwarda = 0; for i in range(N): for j in reversed(range(i,N)): a = a + i + j; O(N^N) O(N*N) O(N/2) O(logN)arrow_forwardFind f(1), f(2), f(3), f(4), and f(5) if f(n) is defined re-cursively by f(0) = 3 and for n = 0, 1, 2, ... a) f(n + 1) = −2f(n).b) f(n + 1) = 3f(n) + 7.arrow_forwardarrow_back_iosSEE MORE QUESTIONSarrow_forward_ios