Question
Theoretically (that is, if seeing were not an issue), the resolution of a telescope is inversely proportional to its diameter. How much better is the resolution of the ALMA when operating at its longest baseline than the resolution of the Arecibo telescope?
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Step by stepSolved in 2 steps
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- In the dark, your pupil (the aperture of your eye) expands to a diameter of 7 mm. How many times more light can be gathered by a telescope with a 5.5 m diameter than by a fully dark- adapted eye? Increase in light gathered = I timesarrow_forwardThe light-gathering power of a telescope is directly related to the area of the telescope's primary mirror. A mirror with four times the diameter of another mirror collects how many times more light as the smaller mirror does in the same amount of time? (Numerical answer only, please.)arrow_forwardDescribe the SPECT and PET imaging techniques.arrow_forward
- Compare the light-gathering power of one of the 10-m Keck telescopes with that of a 0.5-m telescope.arrow_forwardAstronauts observing from a space station need a telescope with a resolving power of 0.6 arc second at a wavelength of 530 nm and a magnifying power of 220. Design a telescope to meet their needs.What will its light-gathering power be, compared with a dark-adapted human eye? (Assume that the pupil of your eye can open to a diameter of about 0.8 cm in dark conditions.)(State the necessary primary diameter of the telescope, in m, and the ratio of the focal lengths below.)arrow_forwardGeostationary satellites cannot be seen in a telescope from Albany because they are always directly over the Equator. True Falsearrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios