The opioid addiction crisis and its sequelae represent one of the worst problems to surface in the US in many years, with tens of thousands dying and billions of dollars in estimated costs each year across many domains, from employment to health care to criminal justice and beyond. Some say the problem is so large and growing so fast, we need a multi-disciplinary “all hands on deck” approach to addressing it, with the oft-suggested remedies centered around treatment and prevention. Though economics cannot cure addiction or save the life of someone who has recently overdosed on some substance or other, which of the following can and should health economists do to help?   a. Evaluate the costs of doing nothing, i.e., the status quo, to show policy makers the scale of the resources we are implicitly devoting to unsuccessful strategy today, and thus to justify re-directing resources to more effective purposes   b. Evaluate the cost-effectiveness of alternative treatment modalities to determine which ones dominate others, i.e., have the greatest ICER   c. Explain externalities to all who will listen so law enforcement, hospitals, and schools all understand their self-interest in working together   d. All of the above   e. None of the above

EBK HEALTH ECONOMICS AND POLICY
7th Edition
ISBN:9781337668279
Author:Henderson
Publisher:Henderson
Chapter4: Economic Evaluation In Health Care
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 6QAP
icon
Related questions
Question

The opioid addiction crisis and its sequelae represent one of the worst problems to surface in the US in many years, with tens of thousands dying and billions of dollars in estimated costs each year across many domains, from employment to health care to criminal justice and beyond. Some say the problem is so large and growing so fast, we need a multi-disciplinary “all hands on deck” approach to addressing it, with the oft-suggested remedies centered around treatment and prevention. Though economics cannot cure addiction or save the life of someone who has recently overdosed on some substance or other, which of the following can and should health economists do to help?

  a.

Evaluate the costs of doing nothing, i.e., the status quo, to show policy makers the scale of the resources we are implicitly devoting to unsuccessful strategy today, and thus to justify re-directing resources to more effective purposes

  b.

Evaluate the cost-effectiveness of alternative treatment modalities to determine which ones dominate others, i.e., have the greatest ICER

  c.

Explain externalities to all who will listen so law enforcement, hospitals, and schools all understand their self-interest in working together

  d.

All of the above

  e.

None of the above

Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Population Health
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
EBK HEALTH ECONOMICS AND POLICY
EBK HEALTH ECONOMICS AND POLICY
Economics
ISBN:
9781337668279
Author:
Henderson
Publisher:
YUZU