The manager of a plant that manufactures stepper drives knows that Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS) and Double Declining Balance (DDB) are both accelerated depreciation methods, but out of curiosity, he wants to determine which one offers faster write-off in the first 3 years for equipment that has a first cost of $500,000, a 5-year life/recovery period, and a $40,000 salvage value. Determine which method provides a faster write-off for 3 years (i.e., yields lower book-value in year 3) and by how much? (Note: Use GDS 5-year recovery. period for MACRS)

The manager of a plant that manufactures stepper drives knows that Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS) and Double Declining Balance (DDB) are both accelerated depreciation methods, but out of curiosity, he wants to determine which one offers faster write-off in the first 3 years for equipment that has a first cost of $500,000, a 5-year life/recovery period, and a $40,000 salvage value. Determine which method provides a faster write-off for 3 years (i.e., yields lower book-value in year 3) and by how much? (Note: Use GDS 5-year recovery. period for MACRS)

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING

10th Edition

ISBN:9781259964947

Author:Libby

Publisher:Libby

Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1Q

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The manager of a plant that manufactures stepper drives knows that MACRS and DDB are both accelerated depreciation methods, but out of curiosity, he wants to determine which one offers faster write-off in the first three years for equipment that has a first cost of $400,000, a 5-year life, and a $50,000 salvage value. Determine which method yields the lower book value and by how much. DDB provides faster write-off for 3 years and difference is $28,800 DDB provides faster write-off for 3 years and difference is $12,600 MACRS provides faster write-off for 3 years and difference is $28,800 MACRS provides faster write-off for 3 years and difference is $12,600
The manager of a plant that manufactures stepper drives knows that MACRS and DDB are both accelerated depreciation methods, but out of curiosity, he wants to determine which one offers faster write-off in the first three years for equipment that has a first cost of $300,000, a 5-year life, and a $60,000 salvage value. Determine which method yields the lower book value and by how much.
At times firms will need to decide if they want to continue to use their current equipment or replace the equipment with newer equipment. The company will need to do replacement analysis to determine which option is the best financial decision for the company. Price Co. is considering replacing an existing piece of equipment. The project involves the following: • The new equipment will have a cost of $1,800,000, and it will be depreciated on a straight-line basis over a period of six years (years 1–6). • The old machine is also being depreciated on a straight-line basis. It has a book value of $200,000 (at year 0) and four more years of depreciation left ($50,000 per year). • The new equipment will have a salvage value of $0 at the end of the project's life (year 6). The old machine has a current salvage value (at year 0) of $300,000. • Replacing the old machine will require an investment in net operating working capital (NOWC) of $50,000 that will be recovered at the end…
The management of Brawn Engineering is considering three alternatives to satisfy an OSHA requirement for safety gates in the machine shop. Each gate will completely satisfy the requirement, so no combinations need to be considered. The first costs, operating costs, and salvage values over a 5-year planning horizon are shown below. Using a future worth analysis with a MARR of 20%/year, determine the preferred gate.
Englewood Company has an opportunity to produce and sell a revolutionary new smoke detector for homes. To determine whether this would be a profitable venture, the company has gathered the following data on probable costs and market potential: a. New equipment would have to be acquired to produce the smoke detector. The equipment would cost $100,000 and be useable for 12 years. After 12 years, it would have a salvage value equal to 10% of the original cost. b. Production and sales of the smoke detector would require a working capital investment of $ 40,000 to finance accounts receivable, inventories, and day-to-day cash needs. This working capital would be released for use elsewhere after 12 years. c. An extensive marketing study projects sales in units over the next 12 years as follows: Year Sales in Units 1... 7,000 3..... ... 10,000 4 -12.. ..... 4,000 2.... d. The smoke detectors would sell for $45 each; variable costs for production, administration, and sales would be $25 per…
The manager of a plant that manufactures stepper drives knewthat MACRS and DDB were both accelerated depreciation methods, but out of curiosity, hewanted to know which one would provide the faster write-off in the first 3 years for equipmentthat has a first cost of $300,000, a 5-year life, and a $60,000 salvage value.(a) Use hand calculations to determine which method yields the lower book value and by howmuch.(b) Develop the complete depreciation schedules on a spreadsheet and use them to answer thequestions above.(c) Using your spreadsheet results, explain what happened to the DDB depreciation amounts foryears 4 and 5.
At times firms will need to decide if they want to continue to use their current equipment or replace the equipment with newer equipment. The company will need to do replacement analysis to determine which option is the best financial decision for the company. Price Co. is considering replacing an existing piece of equipment. The project involves the following: • The new equipment will have a cost of $600,000, and it is eligible for 100% bonus depreciation so it will be fully depreciated at t = 0. • The old machine was purchased before the new tax law, so it is being depreciated on a straight-line basis. It has a book value of $200,000 (at year 0) and four more years of depreciation left ($50,000 per year). • The new equipment will have a salvage value of $0 at the end of the project's life (year 6). The old machine has a current salvage value (at year 0) of $300,000. • Replacing the old machine will require an investment in net operating working capital (NOWC) of $50,000…
A new engineer at a sand and gravel operation is considering two mutually exclusive alternatives for a small dredging system. The first option from the Diggemup Corporation would cost $-122,208, have a salvage value of $14,279, and net $30,502 per year in net annual profits. The second option from the Pushmoore Mudd Group would cost $-179,722, have a salvage value of $19,831, and net $34,414 per year in net annual profits. The net profit is listed after operating and maintenance costs. Due to rough service conditions, both systems would be expected to have a service life of only 5 years. The corporate minimum rate of return for expenditures is 15%. Determine the incremental NPV between these two alternatives. Use the standard convention of considering the highest capital project first use the correct sign in your final answer.
Crane Corp. is considering purchasing one of two new diagnostic machines. Either machine would make it possible for the company to bid on jobs that it currently isn't equipped to do. Estimates regarding each machine are provided here. Original cost Estimated life Salvage value Estimated annual cash inflows Estimated annual cash outflows Net present value Machine A $77,000 8 years 0 Profitability index $19,900 $4,800 Machine A Which machine should be purchased? Click here to view the factor table. Calculate the net present value and profitability index of each machine. Assume a 9% discount rate. (If the net present value is negative. use either a negative sign preceding the number eg -45 or parentheses eg (45). Round answer for present value to 0 decimal places, e.g. 125 and profitability index to 2 decimal places, e.g. 10.50. For calculation purposes, use 5 decimal places as displayed in the factor table provided.) Machine B should be purchased. $188,000 8 years 0 $40,200 $9,860…
At times firms will need to decide if they want to continue to use their current equipment or replace the equipment with newer equipment. The company will need to do replacement analysis to determine which option is the best financial decision for the company.Price Co. is considering replacing an existing piece of equipment. The project involves the following:• The new equipment will have a cost of $1,200,000, and it is eligible for 100% bonus depreciation so it will be fully depreciated at t = 0.• The old machine was purchased before the new tax law, so it is being depreciated on a straight-line basis. It has a book value of $200,000 (at year 0) and four more years of depreciation left ($50,000 per year).• The new equipment will have a salvage value of $0 at the end of the project's life (year 6). The old machine has a current salvage value (at year 0) of $300,000.• Replacing the old machine will require an investment in net operating working capital (NOWC) of $30,000 that will be…
At times firms will need to decide if they want to continue to use their current equipment or replace the equipment with newer equipment. The company will need to do replacement analysis to determine which option is the best financial decision for the company. Price Co. is considering replacing an existing piece of equipment. The project involves the following: • The new equipment will have a cost of $2,400,000, and it is eligible for 100% bonus depreciation so it will be fully depreciated at t = 0. • The old machine was purchased before the new tax law, so it is being depreciated on a straight-line basis. It has a book value of $200,000 (at year 0) and four more years of depreciation left ($50,000 per year). • The new equipment will have a salvage value of $0 at the end of the project's life (year 6). The old machine has a current salvage value (at year 0) of $300,000. • Replacing the old machine will require an investment in net operating working capital (NOWC) of…
At times firms will need to decide if they want to continue to use their current equipment or replace the equipment with newer equipment. The company will need to do replacement analysis to determine which option is the best financial decision for the company. LoRusso Co. is considering replacing an existing piece of equipment. The project involves the following: • The new equipment will have a cost of $9,000,000, and it is eligible for 100% bonus depreciation so it will be fully depreciated at t = 0. • The old machine was purchased before the new tax law, so it is being depreciated on a straight-line basis. It has a book value of $200,000 (at year 0) and four more years of depreciation left ($50,000 per year). • The new equipment will have a salvage value of $0 at the end of the project's life (year 6). The old machine has a current salvage value (at year 0) of $300,000. • Replacing the old machine will require an investment in net operating working capital (NOWC) of $60,000 that will…