The following SQL query deletes all drivers in an accident that were not injured (Note that a value of 'N' for injury means that no injury occurred for for this driver this accident): DELETE FROM Drivers NATURAL JOIN Accidents WHERE injury- 'N' True False

Hence, the Internet has become an essential tool for exercising one's right to free expression. Several individuals and groups are guilty of misusing social media sites like Facebook and Twitter to propagate hate speech. Should there be any limits placed on how individuals may share their ideas online? Where should the line be set when it comes to allowing nasty remarks on social networking sites?

It would be incredible if there was a piece of software that would allow a surgeon in one region of the world to do surgery on a patient located in another region of the world through the internet. Once the curtain has fallen on the last act, there is no need for anybody else to be there. How much death and devastation do they want to witness? In the event that they wanted to undermine your credibility, what do you believe the primary point of emphasis would be? Does it first need the existence of an active aggressor for there to be a possibility of damage being caused?

These days, you can't have free speech without the Internet. It's no secret that many people and organizations use social media to spread hateful messages. Should there be restrictions on what may be said online? Is there a way to stop hate speech on social media?

Do you feel the internet and other forms of social media have been a positive force in the development of society as a whole? What leads you to believe that response is the greatest one we could possibly get?

Hello. Thanks for the answer. Does this answer cover 5 entitities or is it 3? Thanks.

As a result, using the Internet has become a crucial tool for exercising one's right to free expression. Hate speech is widely disseminated via social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter, which are widely abused by a large number of individuals and even organizations. Should people's ability to express themselves freely on the internet be unrestricted? Where should the line be set when it comes to allowing nasty remarks on social networking sites?

Laws tell you how to keep private information safe, while ethics tell you how to do it in a way that is morally right. What do you think of privacy?

Even though privacy is highly valued in today's culture, there are conflicting opinions on it. Do you believe that there is still more that can be done to protect online privacy? Do you, for instance, think that laws are adequate?

Are people's lives enhanced or diminished by online gaming? Why do you believe this?