The Economic Value of a Year of Education: Homoskedasticity or Heteroskedasticity? On average, workers with more education have average, hourly carnings increase by $1.93 for cach Ohigher carnings than workers with less cduca- additional year of education. The 95% confidence tion. But if the best-paying jobs mainly go to the col- interval for this coefficient is 1.93 + 1.96 x 0.08, or lege educated, it might also be that the spread of the 1.77 to 2.09. distribution of carnings is greater for workers with The second striking feature of Figure 5.3 is that more education. Docs the distribution of carnings the spread of the distribution of earnings increases with the years of education. While some workers This is an empirical question, so answering it with many years of education have low-paying jobs, spread out as education increases? requires analyzing data. Figure 5.3 is a scatterplot of very few workers with low levels of education have the hourly carnings and the number of ycars of edu- high-paying jobs. This can be quantified by looking at the spread of the residuals around the OLS regres- cation for a sample of 2829 full-time workers in the United States in 2012, ages 29 and 30, with between n sion line. For workers with ten years of education, 6 and 18 years of education. The data come from the standard deviation of the residuals is $4.32; for the March 2013 Current Population Survey, which workers with a high school diploma, this standard is described in Appendix 3.1. Figure 5.3 has two striking features. The first is degree, this standard deviation increases to $12.46. deviation is $7.80; and for workers with a college that the mean of the distribution of carnings increases Because these standard deviations differ for differ- with the number of years of education. This increase ent levels of education, the variance of the residuals is summarized by the OLS regression line, in the on the regression of Equation (5.23) depends value of the regressor (the years of education); in Earnings = -7.29 + 1.93Years Education, (1.10) (0.08) other words, the regression errors are heteroskedas- tic. In real-world terms, not all college graduates will R = 0.162, SER = 10.29. (5.23) be carning $50 per hour by the time they are 29, but This line is plotted in Figure 5.3. The coefficient of 1.93 in the OLS regression line means that, on some will, and workers with only ten years of educa- tion have no shot at those jobs.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
icon
Concept explainers
Question

Read the box “The Economic Value of a Year of Education: Homoskedasticity or Heteroskedasticity?” in the Attachment. Use the regression reported in Equation to answer the following.a. A randomly selected 30-year-old worker reports an education levelof 16 years. What is the worker’s expected average hourly earnings?b. A high school graduate (12 years of education) is contemplatinggoing to a community college for a 2-year degree. How much is thisworker’s average hourly earnings expected to increase?c. A high school counselor tells a student that, on average, college graduates earn $10 per hour more than high school graduates. Is this statement consistent with the regression evidence? What range of values isconsistent with the regression evidence?

The Economic Value of a Year of Education:
Homoskedasticity or Heteroskedasticity?
On average, workers with more education have average, hourly carnings increase by $1.93 for cach
Ohigher carnings than workers with less cduca- additional year of education. The 95% confidence
tion. But if the best-paying jobs mainly go to the col- interval for this coefficient is 1.93 + 1.96 x 0.08, or
lege educated, it might also be that the spread of the 1.77 to 2.09.
distribution of carnings is greater for workers with
The second striking feature of Figure 5.3 is that
more education. Docs the distribution of carnings the spread of the distribution of earnings increases
with the
years of education. While some workers
This is an empirical question, so answering it with many years of education have low-paying jobs,
spread out as education increases?
requires analyzing data. Figure 5.3 is a scatterplot of very few workers with low levels of education have
the hourly carnings and the number of ycars of edu- high-paying jobs. This can be quantified by looking
at the spread of the residuals around the OLS regres-
cation for a sample of 2829 full-time workers in the
United States in 2012, ages 29 and 30, with between
n sion line. For workers with ten years of education,
6 and 18 years of education. The data come from
the standard deviation of the residuals is $4.32; for
the March 2013 Current Population Survey, which workers with a high school diploma, this standard
is described in Appendix 3.1.
Figure 5.3 has two striking features. The first is degree, this standard deviation increases to $12.46.
deviation is $7.80; and for workers with a college
that the mean of the distribution of carnings increases Because these standard deviations differ for differ-
with the number of years of education. This increase ent levels of education, the variance of the residuals
is summarized by the OLS regression line,
in the on the
regression of Equation (5.23) depends
value of the regressor (the years of education); in
Earnings = -7.29 + 1.93Years Education,
(1.10) (0.08)
other words, the regression errors are heteroskedas-
tic. In real-world terms, not all college graduates will
R = 0.162, SER = 10.29.
(5.23)
be carning $50 per hour by the time they are 29, but
This line is plotted in Figure 5.3. The coefficient
of 1.93 in the OLS regression line means that, on
some will, and workers with only ten years of educa-
tion have no shot at those jobs.
Transcribed Image Text:The Economic Value of a Year of Education: Homoskedasticity or Heteroskedasticity? On average, workers with more education have average, hourly carnings increase by $1.93 for cach Ohigher carnings than workers with less cduca- additional year of education. The 95% confidence tion. But if the best-paying jobs mainly go to the col- interval for this coefficient is 1.93 + 1.96 x 0.08, or lege educated, it might also be that the spread of the 1.77 to 2.09. distribution of carnings is greater for workers with The second striking feature of Figure 5.3 is that more education. Docs the distribution of carnings the spread of the distribution of earnings increases with the years of education. While some workers This is an empirical question, so answering it with many years of education have low-paying jobs, spread out as education increases? requires analyzing data. Figure 5.3 is a scatterplot of very few workers with low levels of education have the hourly carnings and the number of ycars of edu- high-paying jobs. This can be quantified by looking at the spread of the residuals around the OLS regres- cation for a sample of 2829 full-time workers in the United States in 2012, ages 29 and 30, with between n sion line. For workers with ten years of education, 6 and 18 years of education. The data come from the standard deviation of the residuals is $4.32; for the March 2013 Current Population Survey, which workers with a high school diploma, this standard is described in Appendix 3.1. Figure 5.3 has two striking features. The first is degree, this standard deviation increases to $12.46. deviation is $7.80; and for workers with a college that the mean of the distribution of carnings increases Because these standard deviations differ for differ- with the number of years of education. This increase ent levels of education, the variance of the residuals is summarized by the OLS regression line, in the on the regression of Equation (5.23) depends value of the regressor (the years of education); in Earnings = -7.29 + 1.93Years Education, (1.10) (0.08) other words, the regression errors are heteroskedas- tic. In real-world terms, not all college graduates will R = 0.162, SER = 10.29. (5.23) be carning $50 per hour by the time they are 29, but This line is plotted in Figure 5.3. The coefficient of 1.93 in the OLS regression line means that, on some will, and workers with only ten years of educa- tion have no shot at those jobs.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 5 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Correlation, Regression, and Association
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman