TCP provides • service, whereas UDP is * and reliable secure unreliable

UDP implementation of dependability and other TCP features is required in order for the QUIC protocol to provide HTTP True False 00.

TCP is a connection-oriented protocol, but IP does not need a connection to function properly. How can these two protocols best coexist in the same protocol stack? What is the most effective way to do this?

TCP is a reliable and full duplex transport layer protocol when it comes to providing services. Full-duplex, connection-oriented, and reliable delivery all imply the same thing?

TCP demands complete openness from all parties involved, which includes almost every endpoint operating system. Is it feasible to manipulate the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), and if so, how may one instance gain an edge over other endpoints?

DNS employs UDP over TCP. No automatic recovery if a DNS packet is missed. Is this a problem, and if so, how?

The UDP protocol is a messaging protocol. Token-based protocols like TCP are known as byte-oriented protocols. Which protocol, UDP or TCP, should an application employ to safeguard the message's boundaries?

Reliability and other TCP features must be ported to UDP in order for the QUIC protocol to provide HTTP True False 00.

TCP demands all parties, including endpoint operating systems, to be transparent. How can one endpoint trick the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)?

What is the purpose of UDP? If user programs were allowed to send only raw IP packets, would it not have sufficed to leave it at that?