syms t 241 60 sin(161) e x=60*sin(16*t)*exp(-((24*t)/5))% Displacement v=diff(x)% Velocity -241 960 cos(161) e 5– 288 sin(161) e a-diff(x,2) % Acceleration a = -241 69888 sin( 161) e 5 clear all t=0; display('displacemt at t-e') x-60*sin(16*t)*exp(-((24*t)/5)) -9216 cos(161) e displacemt at t-e display('Velocity at t=0') v=960* cos (16*t)*exp(-((24*t)/5)) - 288*sin(16*t)*exp(-((24*t)/5)) Velocity at t=0 v = 960 display('Acceleration at t-0') a=- 9216*cos (16*t)*exp(-((24*t)/5)) - (69888*sin(16*t)*exp(-((24*t)/5)))/5 % Displacement clear all Acceleration at t=0 a = -9216 t=0.3 t = 0.3000 display('displacemt at t-e') x-60*sin(16*t)*exp(-((24*t)/5)) bisplay('Velocity at t-0.3') v=960* cos (16*t)*exp(-((24*t)/5)) - 288*sin(16*t)*exp(-((24*t)/5)) displacemt at t-e x - -14.1611 Velocity at t=0.3 v = 87.8752 display('Acceleration at t-0.3') a=- 9216*cos(16*t)*exp(-((24*t)/5)) (69888*sin(16*t)*exp(-((24*t)/5)))/5 % Displacement Acceleration at t-0.3 a - 3.1079e+03

What should programmers keep in mind when building a system?

What does it mean to program in a dynamic fashion?

Microprogrammed control is used in computers, and it is the microprogram that determines the computer's set of instructions. Questioning whether or not a claim is true.