Suppose that there are two firms in a market, firm 1 and firm 2. The market
is declining in size. The game starts in period 0, and the firms can compete in periods 0, 1,
2, 3, ... (i.e., indefinitely) if they so choose. Duopoly profits in period t for firm 1 are equal
to 105 −10t, and they are 10.5 −t for firm 2.
one left in the market) are 510 −25t for firm 1 and 51 −2t for firm 2. At the start of each
period, each firm must decide either to “stay in” or “exit” if it is still active (they do so
simultaneously if both are still active). Once a firm exits, it is out of the market forever and
earns zero in each period thereafter. Firms maximize their (undiscounted) sum of profits.
What is this game’s subgame perfect Nash equilibrium?
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Step by stepSolved in 3 steps
- M7arrow_forwardWhat an oligopoly is? Explain in details. Solve the following problem: Assume that two airline companies decide to engage in collusive behaviour. Let’s analyse the game between two such companies. Suppose that each company can charge either a high price for tickets or a low price. If one company charges €100, it earns low profits if the other company charges €100 also, and high profits if the other company charges €200. On the other hand, if the company charges €200, it earns very low profits if the other company charges €100, and medium profits if the other company charges €200 also. 1. Draw the decision box for this game. 2. What is the Nash equilibrium in this game? Explain. 3. Is there an outcome that would be better than the Nash equilibrium for both airlines? How could it be achieved? Who would lose if it were achieved?arrow_forward1. Prove that every trembling-hand perfect equilibrium (for the agent normal form) is sequential. Show by example that the converse is false. The remaining problems in this chapter concern game-theoretic variations on the classic models of oligopoly. They are primarily about those models and so relate more to material in other chapters, but they could not have been posed until we had covered Nash equilibria and sub game perfection. 2. Prove that in the Bertrand game, if prices must be charged in integer multiples of a penny, then there is always at least one Nash equilibrium in which players do not use weakly dominated strategies.arrow_forward
- (J)arrow_forwardPlease no written by hand and no emage Consider the following Stackelberg duopoly. Both firms produce a homogenous good. Firm 1 chooses how much to supply first. Firm 2 chooses how much to supply after observing the quantity supplied by firm 1. The market demand is Q = 100 - 10P. For firm i, the total cost of production is TC (q) = 5q₁. In a Subgame Perfect Nash Equilibrium, how much does firm 2 produce?arrow_forwardSpace 1 options: less than or equal to, equal to, greater than or equal to Space 2 options: 0 0.5 1 8 16arrow_forward
- Figure 11-5 Firm A Advertise Not Advertise Firm A 70 Firm A 30 Advertise Firm B 80 Firm B 150 Firm B Firm A 140 Firm A 90 Not Advertise Firm B 60 Firm B 100 Figure 11-5 shows the payoffs for two firms in a market that must decide whether or not to advertise. The dominant strategy is a) for Firm A to advertise but not Firm B. b) for neither firm to advertise. C) for both firms to advertise. d) for Firm B to advertise but not Firm A.arrow_forward6arrow_forwardSuppose that each of two firms in an oligopolistic industry has MC = 8 and together they face P = 68 - 2Q a) If the two firms compete in this market what are P, Q, q1, and q2? b) If the two firms collude what are P, Q, q1, andarrow_forward
- QUESTION 13 Consider a market where two firms (1 and 2) produce differentiated goods and compete in prices. The demand for firm 1 is given by D₁(P₁, P2) = 140 - 2p1 + P2 and demand for firm 2's product is D2 (P1, P2) 140 - 2p2 + P1 Both firms have a constant marginal cost of 20. What is the Nash equilibrium price of firm 1? (Only give a full number; if necessary, round to the lower integer; no dollar sign.)arrow_forward10:04 PM cb = Chegg Economics Vo LTE expert.chegg.com/expertqna Time remaining: 00:09:49 Consider the following payoff matrix for two oligopolists that are deciding what quantity to produce: Firm 2 High Quantity Low Quantity $70k; $70k $130k; $20k High Quantity Firm 1 $20k; $130k $100k; $100k Low Quantity In the Nash equilibrium of this game, what are the payoffs to each firm? O a. Firm 1 receives $130k and Firm 2 receives $20k. O b. Firm 1 receives $20k and Firm 2 receives $130k. O c. Firm 1 receives $100k and Firm 2 receives $100k. O d. Firm 1 receives $70k and Firm 2 receives $70k. Answer Skip 4G Exit 2 ¹20%arrow_forwardQuestion 2 Suppose there are two players, an entrant and an incumbent firm playing the following game: the entrant decides whether to stay out or enter. The incumbent decides whether to innovate or not. If the entrant stays out, the entrant firm gets a payoff of 0 whereas the incumbent firm gets a payoff od 1500, independent of the action of the incumbent firm. If the entrant enters and the incumbent doesn't innovate, the entrant gets 1200 whereas the incumbent gets 500. If the entrant enters and the incumbent innovates, the entrant and the incumbent get a payoff of 1000 each. a) Draw the normal form of the game and solve for the Nash equilibrium/equilibria. b) Suppose the game is dynamic: first the entrant decides whether to enter or stay out. If the entrant enters, the incumbent decides whether to innovate or not. If the entrant stays out, the incumbent doesn't get to play. Draw the extensive form of the fame, mark the subgames on paper and solve for the subgame-perfect Nash…arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education