Suppose Ms. Hamir stacked the deck with her design proposal. In other words, she purposefully under-designed the less expensive solution and produced a cost estimate for the higher-end version that she knew would come in over budget if it were chosen. She also knew that SLS had a tendency to hire design consultants to do build projects. It is unethical to produce a consulting report that steers a client toward a specific outcome? Suppose instead that Ms. Hamir had prepared a report that truthfully recommended the more expensive option as the better choice for SLS in her best professional opinion. Further, suppose that SLS management decided on the less expensive option solely to reduce costs without regard to the project's security outcomes. Would she be ethically sound to urge reconsideration of such a decision?

The fundamental advantages of architecture? Analyze how a project changes with and without an architect's input. Does this have any bearing on the product's quality?

We classify projects as part of a project portfolio tracking. Suppose you have two projects, one of them is Large and another one is Medium. As a general rule, these two project-types follow different processes and have different approval levels. For example, a functional spec template for a Small project is not the same as for the Large project. There are total of six criteria to determine which project is Large.   The following four criteria are very similar in both projects Level of experience of managrement team Engineering team familiarity with technology Number of function points (lines of code, story points, requirements, test cases) Number of people involved These two criteria are not similar First project will last for five years and cost a million dollars Second project will cost ten million dollars and last three months From the following three statements, select those ones that are true,     Second project bears a highest risk and more likely to fail…

This is a software engineering question I am unsure about: Considering feasibility analysis (FA), it is CORRECT to state that: Select one or more:   a. A cost-benefit analysis report is the document generated by the FA activity. b. Defining a projects functional and non-functional requirements is a prerequisite for FA. c. A feasibility report is less applicable for Agile-based development as the product owner agrees feasible critical priorities for the backlog. d. Use Case analysis is a technique that can be used for FA. e. If shown to be feasible, FA guarantees that a development project will achieve all desired requirements.   Select one or more options. Which one(s) is correct?