What are the sets of LR(1) items for this BNF grammar? E ::= V | F V := id | id[E] F := id(E)

One last question. For this same grammar, would the LR(1) sets be different if both the parentheses and bracket symbols were treated as terminal symbols?

Ex: FOLLOW(E) = { ], ), $ }

E::= V | F
V:= id | id[E]
F:= id(E)

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

SEE SOLUTION

Follow-up Question

Would the sets be the same if the characters were spaced out?

E::= V | F
V::= id | id [ E ]
F::= id ( E )

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

SEE SOLUTION

Answer 17

Read through expert solutions to related follow-up questions below.

Follow-up Question

Sorry to ask about this BNF grammar again, but what would the LR(1) sets be if the parentheses and bracket symbols were terminal symbols?

E::= V | F
V:= id | id[E]
F:= id(E)

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

SEE SOLUTION

Follow-up Question

One last question. For this same grammar, would the LR(1) sets be different if both the parentheses and bracket symbols were treated as terminal symbols?

Ex: FOLLOW(E) = { ], ), $ }

E::= V | F
V:= id | id[E]
F:= id(E)

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

SEE SOLUTION

Follow-up Question

Would the sets be the same if the characters were spaced out?

E::= V | F
V::= id | id [ E ]
F::= id ( E )

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

SEE SOLUTION

Answer 18

Read through expert solutions to related follow-up questions below.

Answer 19

Follow-up Question

Sorry to ask about this BNF grammar again, but what would the LR(1) sets be if the parentheses and bracket symbols were terminal symbols?

E::= V | F
V:= id | id[E]
F:= id(E)

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

SEE SOLUTION

Follow-up Question

One last question. For this same grammar, would the LR(1) sets be different if both the parentheses and bracket symbols were treated as terminal symbols?

Ex: FOLLOW(E) = { ], ), $ }

E::= V | F
V:= id | id[E]
F:= id(E)

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

SEE SOLUTION

Follow-up Question

Would the sets be the same if the characters were spaced out?

E::= V | F
V::= id | id [ E ]
F::= id ( E )

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

SEE SOLUTION

Answer 20

Follow-up Question

Sorry to ask about this BNF grammar again, but what would the LR(1) sets be if the parentheses and bracket symbols were terminal symbols?

E::= V | F
V:= id | id[E]
F:= id(E)

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

SEE SOLUTION

Answer 21

Follow-up Question

Sorry to ask about this BNF grammar again, but what would the LR(1) sets be if the parentheses and bracket symbols were terminal symbols?

E::= V | F
V:= id | id[E]
F:= id(E)

Answer 22

Follow-up Question

Answer 23

Follow-up Question

Answer 24

Sorry to ask about this BNF grammar again, but what would the LR(1) sets be if the parentheses and bracket symbols were terminal symbols?

E::= V | F
V:= id | id[E]
F:= id(E)

Answer 25

Sorry to ask about this BNF grammar again, but what would the LR(1) sets be if the parentheses and bracket symbols were terminal symbols?

E::= V | F
V:= id | id[E]
F:= id(E)

Answer 26

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

SEE SOLUTION

Answer 27

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

SEE SOLUTION

Answer 28

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

Answer 29

by Bartleby Expert

Answer 30

by Bartleby Expert

Answer 31

Follow-up Question

One last question. For this same grammar, would the LR(1) sets be different if both the parentheses and bracket symbols were treated as terminal symbols?

Ex: FOLLOW(E) = { ], ), $ }

E::= V | F
V:= id | id[E]
F:= id(E)

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

SEE SOLUTION

Answer 32

Follow-up Question

One last question. For this same grammar, would the LR(1) sets be different if both the parentheses and bracket symbols were treated as terminal symbols?

Ex: FOLLOW(E) = { ], ), $ }

E::= V | F
V:= id | id[E]
F:= id(E)

Answer 33

Follow-up Question

Answer 34

Follow-up Question

Answer 35

One last question. For this same grammar, would the LR(1) sets be different if both the parentheses and bracket symbols were treated as terminal symbols?

Ex: FOLLOW(E) = { ], ), $ }

E::= V | F
V:= id | id[E]
F:= id(E)

Answer 36

One last question. For this same grammar, would the LR(1) sets be different if both the parentheses and bracket symbols were treated as terminal symbols?

Ex: FOLLOW(E) = { ], ), $ }

E::= V | F
V:= id | id[E]
F:= id(E)

Answer 37

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

SEE SOLUTION

Answer 38

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

SEE SOLUTION

Answer 39

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

Answer 40

by Bartleby Expert

Answer 41

by Bartleby Expert

Answer 42

Follow-up Question

Would the sets be the same if the characters were spaced out?

E::= V | F
V::= id | id [ E ]
F::= id ( E )

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

SEE SOLUTION

Answer 43

Follow-up Question

Would the sets be the same if the characters were spaced out?

E::= V | F
V::= id | id [ E ]
F::= id ( E )

Answer 44

Follow-up Question

Answer 45

Follow-up Question

Answer 46

Would the sets be the same if the characters were spaced out?

E::= V | F
V::= id | id [ E ]
F::= id ( E )

Answer 47

Would the sets be the same if the characters were spaced out?

E::= V | F
V::= id | id [ E ]
F::= id ( E )

Answer 48

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

SEE SOLUTION

Answer 49

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

SEE SOLUTION

Answer 50

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

Answer 51

by Bartleby Expert

Answer 52

by Bartleby Expert

Answer 53

Follow-up Questions

Read through expert solutions to related follow-up questions below.

Follow-up Question

Sorry to ask about this BNF grammar again, but what would the LR(1) sets be if the parentheses and bracket symbols were terminal symbols?

E::= V | F
V:= id | id[E]
F:= id(E)

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

SEE SOLUTION

Follow-up Question

One last question. For this same grammar, would the LR(1) sets be different if both the parentheses and bracket symbols were treated as terminal symbols?

Ex: FOLLOW(E) = { ], ), $ }

E::= V | F
V:= id | id[E]
F:= id(E)

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

SEE SOLUTION

Follow-up Question

Would the sets be the same if the characters were spaced out?

E::= V | F
V::= id | id [ E ]
F::= id ( E )

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

SEE SOLUTION

Answer 54

Read through expert solutions to related follow-up questions below.

Follow-up Question

Sorry to ask about this BNF grammar again, but what would the LR(1) sets be if the parentheses and bracket symbols were terminal symbols?

E::= V | F
V:= id | id[E]
F:= id(E)

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

SEE SOLUTION

Follow-up Question

One last question. For this same grammar, would the LR(1) sets be different if both the parentheses and bracket symbols were treated as terminal symbols?

Ex: FOLLOW(E) = { ], ), $ }

E::= V | F
V:= id | id[E]
F:= id(E)

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

SEE SOLUTION

Follow-up Question

Would the sets be the same if the characters were spaced out?

E::= V | F
V::= id | id [ E ]
F::= id ( E )

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

SEE SOLUTION

Answer 55

Read through expert solutions to related follow-up questions below.

Answer 56

Follow-up Question

Sorry to ask about this BNF grammar again, but what would the LR(1) sets be if the parentheses and bracket symbols were terminal symbols?

E::= V | F
V:= id | id[E]
F:= id(E)

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

SEE SOLUTION

Follow-up Question

One last question. For this same grammar, would the LR(1) sets be different if both the parentheses and bracket symbols were treated as terminal symbols?

Ex: FOLLOW(E) = { ], ), $ }

E::= V | F
V:= id | id[E]
F:= id(E)

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

SEE SOLUTION

Follow-up Question

Would the sets be the same if the characters were spaced out?

E::= V | F
V::= id | id [ E ]
F::= id ( E )

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

SEE SOLUTION

Answer 57

Follow-up Question

Sorry to ask about this BNF grammar again, but what would the LR(1) sets be if the parentheses and bracket symbols were terminal symbols?

E::= V | F
V:= id | id[E]
F:= id(E)

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

SEE SOLUTION

Answer 58

Follow-up Question

Sorry to ask about this BNF grammar again, but what would the LR(1) sets be if the parentheses and bracket symbols were terminal symbols?

E::= V | F
V:= id | id[E]
F:= id(E)

Answer 59

Follow-up Question

Answer 60

Follow-up Question

Answer 61

Sorry to ask about this BNF grammar again, but what would the LR(1) sets be if the parentheses and bracket symbols were terminal symbols?

E::= V | F
V:= id | id[E]
F:= id(E)

Answer 62

Sorry to ask about this BNF grammar again, but what would the LR(1) sets be if the parentheses and bracket symbols were terminal symbols?

E::= V | F
V:= id | id[E]
F:= id(E)

Answer 63

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

SEE SOLUTION

Answer 64

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

SEE SOLUTION

Answer 65

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

Answer 66

by Bartleby Expert

Answer 67

by Bartleby Expert

Answer 68

Follow-up Question

One last question. For this same grammar, would the LR(1) sets be different if both the parentheses and bracket symbols were treated as terminal symbols?

Ex: FOLLOW(E) = { ], ), $ }

E::= V | F
V:= id | id[E]
F:= id(E)

Solution

by Bartleby Expert

SEE SOLUTION

Answer 69

Follow-up Question

One last question. For this same grammar, would the LR(1) sets be different if both the parentheses and bracket symbols were treated as terminal symbols?

Ex: FOLLOW(E) = { ], ), $ }

E::= V | F
V:= id | id[E]
F:= id(E)

Answer 70

Follow-up Question

Answer 71

Follow-up Question

Answer 72

One last question. For this same grammar, would the LR(1) sets be different if both the parentheses and bracket symbols were treated as terminal symbols?

Ex: FOLLOW(E) = { ], ), $ }

E::= V | F
V:= id | id[E]
F:= id(E)

Answer 73

One last question. For this same grammar, would the LR(1) sets be different if both the parentheses and bracket symbols were treated as terminal symbols?

Ex: FOLLOW(E) = { ], ), $ }

E::= V | F
V:= id | id[E]
F:= id(E)