SIMD work better with data or control parallelism? To what extent does the underlying software's parallelism approach facilitate MIMD?

Imagine that three loop iterations on a parallel computer are the same as making a cake. In the cake-making process, identify and describe instances of data-level and task-level parallelism.

Which kind of parallelism (data or control) is most appropriate for SIMD implementation? What kind of parallelism does MIMD excel at at the program level, and why?

What are the two main goals of parallelism?

For SIMD, is the best sort of parallelism one that involves data or one that involves control? Which kind of parallelism at the level of the programme is best appropriate for use with MIMD?

Is SIMD better suited for data or control-level parallelism? Which kind of parallelism does MIMD do very well in?

Which form of program-level parallelism-data or control-is better suited to SIMD is the issue at hand. What kind of parallelism is best for MIMD when it comes to parallelism at the programme level?

Completing three iterations of a loop on a parallel computer is comparable to constructing a cake. In the cake-making loop, look for data-level parallelism and task-level parallelism.

Discuss the concept of instruction-level parallelism and its relation to pipelining.

In the same way as three loop iterations on a parallel computer is like baking a cake, so too is the process of making a cake. Determine and describe instances of data-level and task-level parallelism in the baking process.