The debate is whether SIMD is better suited to data or control-level parallelism. When it comes to parallelism at the programme level, what kind is best appropriate for MIMD?

Which kind of parallelism at the level of the program (data or control) works best with SIMD? What kind of parallelism at the program level does MIMD do well?

For Von Neumann architecture bottleneck, what are possible ways that the bottleneck can be reduced ?Which is the  the best answer  A. Increased the system memory speed. B. Expand the data path from CPU to system memory. C. A and B. D. None of the above.

Read the given scenario and answer questions based on 8086 microprocessor architecture. A programmer has written Assembly Language Program (ALP) using 8086 instruction set. The program will read any 200 user given inputs and process them to generate 200 outputs using stack. Each input and output is a byte length data. The input values are read from memory location D217H onward and the output values are stored from memory location E106H onward. The program uses a stack and the stack is defined from the memory location 54DAH and it can store 500 values. The program has 450 instructions stored from the memory location 6E20H to 713DH. The last instruction is HLT which is a byte long instruction. Identify the segments of the given memory locations Memory Location 6EEEH Code Segment Memory Location D2D0, Data Segment Memory Location 55A2H Stack Segment What will be the value of the Instruction Pointer (IP) when the program is about to execute the 449th instruction which is of a two address…

Systolic arrays, a kind of array, include MISD machines. A networked pipeline of data processing equipment is a systolic array. No programme counter is needed since execution is started by fresh data. Each timed systolic array unit computes and communicates in unison, isn't that correct?

The question is, whether kind of program-level parallelism (data or control) is best suited to SIMD. When it comes to parallelism at the program level, what type is most suited for MIMD?

Which kind of program-level parallelism, data or control, lends itself more naturally to SIMD? What type of parallelism at the programme level does MIMD do very well?

Let us suppose, for the sake of simplicity, that each instruction on a RISC processor is processed in 2 microseconds and that an I/O device can only wait for an interrupt to be handled for a maximum of 1 millisecond before it is serviced. When interruptions are turned off, the number of instructions that may be performed is limited.

What is the precise distinction between logical and linear address, and what is their relationship?

How do pre-fetching and caching mechanisms work in tandem with pipelining to enhance performance?