
Shui Fabrics
Ray Betzell, general manager for the past five years of a joint venture between Ohio-based Rocky River Industries and Shanghai Fabric LTd., was feeling caught in the middle these days. As he looked out over Shanghai’s modern gleaming skyline from his corner office, Ray knew his Chinese deputy general manager, Chiu Wai, couldn’t be more pleased with
the way things were going. Ten years ago, Rocky River had launched Shui Fabrics, a 50-50 joint venture between the US textile manufacturer and the Chinese company, to produce, dye and coat fabric for sale to both Chinese and international sportswear manufacturers.
After many obstacles, considerable red tape, and several money-losing years, the joint venture was fulfilling Chiu Wai’s expectations – and that those of the local government and party officials who were keeping careful tabs on the enterprise – much more quickly than he’d anticipated. By providing jobs to close to 3,000 people, Shui was making a real
contribution to the local economy. Job creation was no small accomplishment in a country where outside experts estimated that the actual (as opposed to the official)
rate routinely hovered at 20 percent. From Chiu Wai’s point of view, Shui was generating just the right level of profit – not
too little and, just as importantly, not too much. With so many US-Chinese joint ventures still operating in the red, Chiu Wai saw no reason Ray’s American bosses shouldn’t be more satisfied with their 5 percent annual
If Chiu Wai had been eavesdropping on the conversation Ray had just had with Rocky River president Paul Danvers, the Chinese manager would have certainly been dismayed. Ray, who’d thoroughly enjoyed his time in China, was painfully aware of the quiet frustration in his boss’s voice as it travelled over the phone lines from the other side of the world. To be sure, Paul conceded, Shui had cut Rocky River’s labor costs, given the company access to the potentially huge Chinese market, and helped inoculate the firm against the uncertainty surrounding the periodic, often contentious US-Chinese textile trade negotiations. Current US tariffs and quotas could change at any time.
“But a 5 percent ROI is just pathetic,” Paul complained. “And we’ve been stuck there for three years nor. At this point, I’d expected to be looking at something more on the order of 20 percent.” He pointed out that greater efficiency plus incorporating more sophisticated technology would allow Shui to reduce its workforce substantially and put it on the road to a more acceptable ROI. “I’m well aware of the fact that the Chinese wor for a
fraction of what we’d have to pay American workers, and I do appreciate the pressure the government is putting on you guys. But still, it doesn’t make any sense for us to hire more workers than we would in a comparable US plant.”
After an uncomfortable silence, during which Ray tried and failed to picture
broaching the subject of possible layoffs to his Chinese counterparts, he heard Paul ask the question he’d been dreading: “I’m beginning to think it’s time to pull the plug on Shui. Is there any way you can see to turn this around, Ray, or should we start thinking about other options? Staying in China is a given, but there has to be a better way to do it.”
Shui Fabrics Strength Weaknesses Opportunities Threats Analysis (SWOT)

Step by stepSolved in 3 steps

- Graeter’s hired management consultants to help improveits training procedures and expand distribution. “I thinkmy cousins and I all have come to realize we can’t do italone,” says the CEO. Why do you think the managementteam made this decision? Does the involvement of outside consultants move Graeter’s further from its roots asa family business?arrow_forwardFrom our textbook, we have learned that Folgers was very slow to recognize the potential retail giant that was Starbucks. The Seattle-based company was taking the coffee world by storm. Hundreds of retail coffee houses were opening across the country as market share, and customer wants bloomed. Starbucks following continued to gain strength as store after store was opened in what seemed like every town in America. Proctor & Gamble, Folger’s parent company, did nothing while Starbucks took over the coffee shop market and then carried that momentum into grocery stores. Starbucks, the coffee house juggernaut, was now on the same shelf as Folgers. P&G’s only answer was to sell Folgers. It had no recourse against the coffee powerhouse from the west coast. Questions: Once recognized as a threat, what could Proctor & Gamble have done to combat the insurgence of Starbucks into their market share? Was selling the Folgers brand the correct choice for Proctor & Gamble?…arrow_forwardDiscuss the five (5) types of entrepreneurial groups evident in the case, as well as a minimum of two (2) skills required to be a member of each group.arrow_forward
- Principles Of MarketingMarketingISBN:9780134492513Author:Kotler, Philip, Armstrong, Gary (gary M.)Publisher:Pearson Higher Education,MarketingMarketingISBN:9781259924040Author:Roger A. Kerin, Steven W. HartleyPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationFoundations of Business (MindTap Course List)MarketingISBN:9781337386920Author:William M. Pride, Robert J. Hughes, Jack R. KapoorPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Marketing: An Introduction (13th Edition)MarketingISBN:9780134149530Author:Gary Armstrong, Philip KotlerPublisher:PEARSONContemporary MarketingMarketingISBN:9780357033777Author:Louis E. Boone, David L. KurtzPublisher:Cengage Learning





