Should the owners of zombie computers be subject to fines or other types of sanctions in order to urge users to adequately safeguard their systems?

Should zombie computer owners be liable to fines or other consequences to encourage users to properly secure their systems?

compare Windows Defender with another free anti-malware application.

Think about the following case: You have software installation instructions in the form of executable code. Which kind of malicious software would it be if the executable code was modified both before and after installation? Please provide justification for your answer.

Give a concrete illustration of the effects of malware, viruses, worms, and DoS attacks.

In your perspective, how risky is it to make use of such a program? Is there any chance that it may be harmful?

Windows Defender and another free anti-malware application are compared to demonstrate differences.

compare Windows Defender with another free anti-malware application.

To launch a successful distributed denial-of-service attack, the malicious hacker must first download malware that turns unprotected machines into zombies. Should zombie computer owners be fined or otherwise penalised in order to promote better computer security? So, what's the deal?