Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. The results are shown in the table for the treatment (with magnets) group and the sham (or placebo) group. The results are a measure of reduction in back pain. Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. Complete parts (a) and (b) below. Treatment Sham μ μ1 μ2 n 16 16 x 0.55 0.36 s 0.84 1.49 a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment. What are the null and alternative hypotheses? A. H0: μ1=μ2 H1: μ1≠μ2 B. H0: μ1=μ2 H1: μ1>μ2 C. H0: μ1<μ2 H1: μ1≥μ2 D. H0: μ1≠μ2 H1: μ1<μ2 The test statistic, t, is The P-value is State the conclusion for the test. Fail to reject Reject the null hypothesis. There is not is sufficient evidence to support the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment. Is it valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are larger? Since the sample mean sample standard deviation for those treated with magnets is greater than less than equal to the sample mean for those given a sham treatment, it is not is valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are larger. b. Construct a confidence interval suitable for testing the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment. <μ1−μ2<
Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. The results are shown in the table for the treatment (with magnets) group and the sham (or placebo) group. The results are a measure of reduction in back pain. Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. Complete parts (a) and (b) below. Treatment Sham μ μ1 μ2 n 16 16 x 0.55 0.36 s 0.84 1.49 a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment. What are the null and alternative hypotheses? A. H0: μ1=μ2 H1: μ1≠μ2 B. H0: μ1=μ2 H1: μ1>μ2 C. H0: μ1<μ2 H1: μ1≥μ2 D. H0: μ1≠μ2 H1: μ1<μ2 The test statistic, t, is The P-value is State the conclusion for the test. Fail to reject Reject the null hypothesis. There is not is sufficient evidence to support the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment. Is it valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are larger? Since the sample mean sample standard deviation for those treated with magnets is greater than less than equal to the sample mean for those given a sham treatment, it is not is valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are larger. b. Construct a confidence interval suitable for testing the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment. <μ1−μ2<
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
Related questions
Topic Video
Question
Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. The results are shown in the table for the treatment (with magnets) group and the sham (or placebo) group. The results are a measure of reduction in back pain. Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from
|
|
|
Treatment
|
Sham
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
μ
|
μ1
|
μ2
|
|||
n
|
16
|
16
|
|||
x
|
0.55
|
0.36
|
|||
s
|
0.84
|
1.49
|
a. Use a
0.05
significance level to test the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment.What are the null and alternative hypotheses?
H0:
μ1=μ2
H1:
μ1≠μ2
H0:
μ1=μ2
H1:
μ1>μ2
H0:
μ1<μ2
H1:
μ1≥μ2
H0:
μ1≠μ2
H1:
μ1<μ2
The test statistic, t, is
The P-value is
State the conclusion for the test.
Fail to reject
Reject
is not
is
Is it valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are larger?
Since the
for those treated with magnets is
the sample mean for those given a sham treatment, it
valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are larger.
sample mean
sample standard deviation
greater than
less than
equal to
is not
is
b. Construct a confidence interval suitable for testing the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment.
<μ1−μ2<
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 2 images
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman