Required information The Ferre Publishing Company has three service departments and two operating departments. Selected data from a recent period on the five departments follow: Costs Number of employees Square feet of space occupied Hours of press time. Departmental costs before allocations Allocations: Service Departments Administration Janitorial Maintenance Binding $ 154,000 $ 115,500 $ 52,800 $ 302,500 140 315 20,000 40,000 30,000 Administration costs Janitorial costs Maintenance costs Total costs after allocations 60 15,000 The company allocates service department costs by the step-down method in the following order: Administration (number of mployees), Janitorial (space occupied), and Maintenance (hours of press time). Administration $ Cequired: Using the step-down method, allocate the service department costs to the operating departments. (Please enter allocations from a lepartment as negative and allocations to a department as positive. The line should add across to zero. Do not round ntermediate calculations.) Service Departments (154,000) Janitorial 35 10,000 $ 154,000 $ 115,500 $ 0 0 0 $ 0 115,500 Maintenance $ Operating Departments Printing $ 473,000 210 100,000 60,000 52,800 $ 52,800 $ Operating Departments Binding 302,500 $ Total $ 1,097,800 302,500 $ Total 760 185,000 90,000 Printing 473,000 $1,097,800 473,000 $ 943,800

am104.

Support department cost allocation-direct method Becker Tabletops has two support departments (Janitorial and Cafeteria) and two production departments (Cutting and Assembly). Relevant detail Support Department Cost Driver Square footage to be serviced Janitorial Department Cafeteria Department Number of employees Janitorial Department $310,000 Cafeteria Department $169,000 5,000 3 Janitorial Department cost allocation. Cafeteria Department cost allocation Cutting Department $1,504,000 Department costs Square feet 50 1,000 Number of employees 10 30 Allocate the support department costs to the production departments using the direct method. Cutting Department Assembly Department $580,000 4,000 10 Assembly Department

ces. Required information Use the following information for the Quick Studies below. (Algo) Rafner Manufacturing has the following budgeted data for its two production departments.. Budgeted Data Overhead cost Direct labor hours Machine hours Assembly $1,437,500 12,500 direct labor hours 5,500 machine hours Finishing $914,500 19,500 direct labor hours 15,500 machine hours QS 17-8 (Algo) Allocating overhead with departmental rates LO P2 Allocate overhead to a job that uses 75 direct labor hours in the Assembly department and uses 60 machine hours in the Finishing department Department Departmental Overhead Rate Hours Used Overhead Allocated Assembly S 1,437 000 per direct labor hour 12.500 DLHS $ 17.962.500,000 Finishing $ 914,500 per direct labor hour i 19.500 OLHS 17,832,750,000 Total $ 35.795.250.000

Department Personnel Custodial Services Maintenance Printing Binding Personnel Custodial Services Maintenance Printing Binding Total budgeted cost Total Labor- Square Feet of Space Occupied Printing Department Binding Department Total hours Hours 16,000 8,200 14,300 30,600 108,000 177,100 Budgeted overhead costs in each department for the current year are shown below: $ 300,000 66,000 93,400 Req 1 Req 2 12,400 3,100 10,500 40,400 20,900 87,300 Machine-Hours 2,400 500 2,900 414,000 170,000 $ 1,043,400 Number of Employees 22 49 69 Req 3A 105 300 545 Because of its simplicity, the company has always used the direct method to allocate service department costs to the two operating departments. Machine- Hours Required: 1. Using the step-down method, allocate the service department costs to the consuming departments. Then compute predetermined overhead rates in the two operating departments. Use machine-hours as the allocation base in the Printing Department and direct labor-hours as the…

View Policies Current Attempt in Progress The following T-accounts record the operations of Bonita Co.: Beginning Balance Ending Balance Beginning Balance Direct Material Direct Labor Overhead Ending Balance Beginning Balance COGM Ending Balance Direct Materials 29,000 17,000 ? Work in Process 37,000 165,000 28,000 44,000 ? Finished Goods 15,000 Direct materials purchased ? ? Costs of goods manufactured 244,000 (a) Calculate the amount of direct materials purchased during the period. 644,000 COGS $ ? (b) Calculate the cost of goods manufactured during the period. LA $

Support department cost allocation-direct method Becker Tabletops has two support departments (Janitorial and Cafeteria) and two production departments (Cutting and Assembly). Relevant details for these departments are as follows: Support Department Janitorial Department Cafeteria Department Cost Driver Square footage to be serviced Number of employees Janitorial Department $300,000 Janitorial Department cost allocation Cafeteria Department cost allocation Cafeteria Department $170,000 4,700 2 44 8 Department costs Square feet Number of employees Allocate the support department costs to the production departments using the direct method. Cutting Department LA Cutting Department $1,500,000 2,400 21 $ Assembly Department SA Assembly Department $680,000 3,600 9 S < 11:15 PM 2/25/2024

PLease show work Not sure how to calulate properly  IS Personnel Administration Residential Commercial Number of IS service tickets 90 120 75 1,410 940 Number of employees 35 40 27 138 162 Square footage occupied 3,900 8,000 3,800 16,100 69,500 The costs of the service departments and the allocation basis for each department follow. Department Direct Cost Allocation Base Information Systems (IS) $ 17,000 IS service tickets Personnel 24,000 Employees Administration 20,700 Square footage occupied Assume that the company allocates service department costs to production departments using the direct method. What amount of Information Systems (IS) Department costs will be allocated to the Commercial Department? Assume the same method of allocation as in requirement (a). What amount of personnel department costs is allocated to the residential department? I keep getting mixed up