ragile base class (FBC) is an architectural problem of object-oriented systems where base classes are considered "fragile" because minor changes to the base classes breaks many of the subclasses. We can argue that base classes and sub-classes are tightly coupled due to inheritance, and therefore, the problem is foundmental in whitw-box reuse (inheritance). Based on your understanding of how inheirtance works in Java, discuss at lease one poor practice that introduces the FBC problem and therefore, how we can avoid or minimize the problem. Your discussion does not have to be "perfect", but it must be yours.

pls help with this code in c++.

When can the occurrence of dual inheritance lead to uncertainty? Is there any way to fix this issue? Just what are virtual base classes? Where does their value lie, exactly?

Question Kh  Write the definition of classes and interfaces in the given diagram using following details: a) Interface shape has a method draw(). b) Override the method draw() in all subclasses. c) Define a non-abstract method fillColor() in Circle class. Full explain this question very fast solution sent me step by step Don't ignore any part all part work u

i codecheck.it/files/20072604422gi2zqg7qx7iflhyuOne6naif Problem Statement Inheritance Write the Bicyle class which extends Vehicle. The UML diagram is shown below. Follow it exactly. Vehicle Class Fields owner: string wheels : int Methods • getwheels): int tostring): string • vehide(string owner, int wheels) Bkycle Class vehicle Fields gears : int model 1 string Methods • Bicyde(string o, int w, string mod, int gear) • getGearRatio): int tetring): string • The Bicycle constructor call the superclass constructor to initialize owner and wheels • getGearRatio) returns the product of gears and wheels. (Stupid, I know.) • Override the toString) method and return the information in this form, all on one line: Bicycle(model="Trek T700", gears=21) extends Vehicle(owner="V. Nibali", wheels=2)

Provide real-world examples and contexts where implementing a custom Comparator for a class that already implements the Comparable interface would be necessary.

A lot of these patterns feel very powerful and useful for abstracting and re-using code. Although, I am curious to know as to the extent in which a class "should" be extended in order to prevent unwanted bugs or over-use of a base class that could lead to a chain of inheritance that becomes too brittle.?

In java programming (object-oriented programming in general) Why is it important to invest additional work and additional code to prevent highly coupled classes? Give three basic reasons

Class A is the parent class, while classes B and C are the subclasses of A. Both B and C contain several features and techniques that are equivalent to one another; nevertheless, the implementations of some of their methods are quite different between the two. Explain what kind of class A will be using logic, whether it be a concrete class, an abstract class, or an interface.

When might the multiple inheritance phenomena result in ambiguity? How can we fix this issue? What precisely are virtual base classes? What precisely is their significance?