READ THE ARTICLE BELOW AND ANSWER THE QUESTIONS THAT FOLLOW:
Ernst & Young to Pay $100 Million Penalty for Employees Cheating on CPA Ethics
Exams and Misleading Investigation
Largest Penalty Ever Imposed by SEC Against an Audit Firm
Washington D.C., June 28, 2022
The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged Ernst & Young LLP (EY) for cheating
by its audit professionals on exams required to obtain and maintain Certified Public Accountant
(CPA) licenses, and for withholding evidence of this misconduct from the SEC’s Enforcement
Division during the Division’s investigation of the matter. EY admits the facts underlying the
SEC’s charges and agrees to pay a $100 million penalty and undertake extensive remedial
measures to fix the firm’s ethical issues.
“This action involves breaches of trust by gatekeepers within the gatekeeper entrusted to audit
many of our Nation’s public companies. It’s simply outrageous that the very professionals
responsible for catching cheating by clients cheated on ethics exams of all things,” said Gurbir
S. Grewal, Director of the SEC’s Enforcement Division. “And it’s equally shocking that Ernst &
Young hindered our investigation of this misconduct. This action should serve as a clear
message that the SEC will not tolerate integrity failures by independent auditors who choose
the easier wrong over the harder right.”
EY admits that, over multiple years, a significant number of EY audit professionals cheated on
the ethics component of CPA exams and various continuing professional education courses
required to maintain CPA licenses, including ones designed to ensure that accountants can
properly evaluate whether clients’ financial statements comply with Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles.
EY further admits that during the Enforcement Division’s investigation of potential cheating at
the firm, EY made a submission conveying to the Division that EY did not have current issues
with cheating when, in fact, the firm had been informed of potential cheating on a CPA ethics
exam. EY also admits that it did not correct its submission even after it launched an internal
investigation into cheating on CPA ethics and other exams and confirmed there had been
cheating, and even after its senior lawyers discussed the matter with members of the firm’s senior management. And as the Order finds, EY did not cooperate in the SEC’s investigation
regarding its materially misleading submission.
In addition to paying a $100 million penalty, the Order requires EY to engage in extensive
undertakings, including retaining two separate independent consultants to help remediate its
deficiencies. One consultant will review the firm’s policies and procedures relating to ethics and
integrity. The other will review EY’s conduct regarding its disclosure failures, including whether
any EY employees contributed to the firm’s failure to correct its misleading submission.
“The SEC will not permit the submission of misleading information or any action that delays or
frustrates our mandate to protect investors and our markets,” said Melissa R. Hodgman,
Associate Director of the SEC’s Enforcement Division. “Ernst & Young faces significant
sanctions and extensive remediation to ensure that its culture and conduct meet the ethical
standards required of those responsible for the integrity of our capital markets.”
The Order finds that EY violated a Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)
rule requiring the firm to maintain integrity in the performance of a professional service,
committed acts discreditable to the accounting profession, and failed to maintain an
appropriate system of quality control. EY has admitted the facts underlying these findings and
acknowledged that its conduct violated the integrity standard and provides a basis for the SEC
to impose remedies against the firm pursuant to Sections 4C(a)(2) and (a)(3) of the Exchange
Act and Rules 102(e)(1)(ii) and (iii) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice.
The SEC’s investigation, which is continuing, has been conducted by Ian Rupell and
supervised by Rami Sibay. The SEC thanks the PCAOB for its assistance in this matter.
Source: U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 2022
Question: As an organisational developer, critically discuss how transactional leadership and transformational leadership may result in a positive turnaround for Ernst and Young in context of the
article above.
Step by stepSolved in 3 steps
- Industry’s critics say chemical manufacturers should bear theburden of proof for the safety of their products before theyhit the market. Industry’s supporters say that mandating moresafety research will hamper the introduction of products thatconsumers want and increase the price of products. What doyou think? Should government follow the precautionary principleand require proof of safety prior to a chemical’s introductioninto the market?arrow_forwardThe Nova Scotia government passes a law creating the Nova Scotia Postal Service (NSPS). The premier explains that Canada Post is just not efficient enough and the Nova Scotia government feels it could make money offering a postal service to Nova Scotians. Is it likely that the Nova Scotia government has the jurisdiction to create the NSPS? Explain your answerarrow_forward11arrow_forward
- Ernst & Young to Pay $100 Million Penalty for Employees Cheating on CPAEthics Exams and Misleading InvestigationLargest Penalty Ever Imposed by SEC Against an Audit FirmWashington D.C., June 28, 2022The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged Ernst & Young LLP (EY) forcheating by its audit professionals on exams required to obtain and maintain CertifiedPublic Accountant (CPA) licenses, and for withholding evidence of this misconductfrom the SEC’s Enforcement Division during the Division’s investigation of the matter.EY admits the facts underlying the SEC’s charges and agrees to pay a $100 millionpenalty and undertake extensive remedial measures to fix the firm’s ethical issues.“This action involves breaches of trust by gatekeepers within the gatekeeper entrustedto audit many of our Nation’s public companies. It’s simply outrageous that the veryprofessionals responsible for catching cheating by clients cheated on ethics exams ofall things,” said Gurbir S. Grewal,…arrow_forward73) GAO an agency of the US government Stands for government accountability office Identifies programs in the US government that have potential for fraud and abuse Both A and B Neither A nor Barrow_forwardThe Pizza PuzzleTopic: Deceptive AdvertisingCharacters: George Hansen, General Manager, Augusta Marigold Inn, Subsidiaryof Hospitality Enterprises,Sharon Coombs, Food Services Manager, Augusta Marigold Inn George Hansen is General Manager for the Marigold Inn in Augusta, Georgia. SharonCoombs is Restaurant and Food Services Manager for the Inn. She reports to George. Two years ago, Sharon noticed a decline in room service business, the highest margin portion of her operation. This decline coincided with an increase in the national sales of pizza delivery and carryout firms as well as an increase in the number of empty pizza boxes from these firms being left in guest rooms in the Inn. Her immediate response was to install a pizza oven in the kitchen and offer room service pizza to guests. The effort met with modest success, though it was well below her expectations. Questionnaires completed by departing guests revealed a problem of product quality. Focusing on this problem, Sharon…arrow_forward
- Thompson & Zakaria (2004) addressed that 209 out of 257 companies in Malaysia have made some form of CSR disclosure. Required: Based on the above, justify and explain FOUR (4) reasons of some companies for NOT reporting the CSR.arrow_forwardThe U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) released its final rule to implement a code of ethics under SOX Title 404. The stock exchanges have proposed that each company listed on the exchanges publish its code of ethics. Discuss how disclosures of a code of ethics by senior management could have a positive effect on public confidence and influence investors' behavior. Discuss the consequences of not establishing a code of ethics. Support your position. Evaluate the importance of senior management in setting the tone for the application of the company's code of ethics and promoting positive employee behavior, improved decision making, or the willingness to report unethical behavior of coworkers. Recommend at least two policies that might encourage employees to report unethical behavior.arrow_forwardIntegrity, Objectivity, and Ethics in Business Loan Loss Woes During the economic crisis of 2008, many of the largest U.S. banks were accused of having provided mortgages to marginally qualified borrowers. Such loans, called "sub-prime" and "Alt-A" loans, were made to earn mortgage fees. When the borrowers were unable to pay their mortgages, the banks incurred large losses on defaulted loans. These losses were so large that the U.S. government had to provide money (TARP funds) to many banks to bail them out of their financial distress. During the middle of the crisis, the FASB voted to provide banks more flexibility in applying fair value accounting for bank assets, such as defaulted loans. These FASB rule changes allowed banks to minimize the impact of their defaulted loan write-downs and improve their earnings. Some criticized the FASB as succumbing to political pressure and reducing overall financial statement fairness. Source: lan Katz, "FASB Eases Fair-Value Rules Amid Lawmaker…arrow_forward
- Read and analyze the following situation.Bernard J. Ebbers, chief executive officer and founder of the telecommunications giant, WorldCom, owed the corporation $375 million for a loan secured by shares he owned in the company. The value of the company's stock was declining, to the point that the value of its shares was less than the amount of the loan. On February 2, 2002, Mr. Ebbers engaged in a series of communications with leading Wall Street stock analysts, whose opinions helped drive up the stock price, to refute negative news about the company's financial condition. , which was frightening investors. That day, the company's shares increased by 12% in value. Four months later, the company filed for bankruptcy protection due to its precarious economic condition. Answer the following questions:Are the actions mentioned above illegal? Are they unethical? Support and explain your answer. What is the difference between an illegal action and an unethical one? Support and explain your…arrow_forwardCedar Hospital Systems Fraud Hospital administrator Jake Rosen was recently convicted for fraud he committed against his employer, Cedar Hospital Systems. Over a period of six years, he allegedly made payments to a dummy company for maintenance charges while simultaneously running a scheme with maintenance contractors where he either paid them for work never performed or overpaid them for work. The skyscraper where Jake worked was only 10 years old. Maintenance charges rose from $5.2 million in 1994 to $16.4 million in 2000. It was worth noting that the judge on the case questioned whether Cedar Hospital Systems deserved less than full restitution for failing to notice the problem. However, it was determined that federal law on restitution does not allow such charges, so Jake Rosen will be making monthly payments towards the alleged $8 million he stole until he makes full restitution after leaving prison. He was able to quickly repay $3.2 million of the theft with assets recovered by…arrow_forwardThe Sarbanes-Oxley Act includes additional communication requirements for auditors of public companies. true or false?arrow_forward
- Understanding BusinessManagementISBN:9781259929434Author:William NickelsPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationManagement (14th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134527604Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. CoulterPublisher:PEARSONSpreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...ManagementISBN:9781305947412Author:Cliff RagsdalePublisher:Cengage Learning
- Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...ManagementISBN:9780135191798Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. LaudonPublisher:PEARSONBusiness Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...ManagementISBN:9780134728391Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. GriffinPublisher:PEARSONFundamentals of Management (10th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134237473Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De CenzoPublisher:PEARSON