Question 2
The nuts industry has a history of being highly concentrated. In 1980, the four largest
firms controlled much of the market share. Plonters led the industry with a 28% market
share, followed by HT Foods at 26%, Panamanian Nuts at 23%, and Toatsi at 22%. A
increase by one firm was typically matched by price hikes from the others. Each year, the
big four firms heavily advertised and distributed millions of coupons to promote
consumer loyalty.
In 2004, HT Foods acquires Panamanian Nuts and Toatsi which resulted in skyrocketing
prices. Many consumers complained about inflated prices and investigations were
conducted by the authorities.
i. State what market structure exists in the nuts industry during the 1980s. Can
excess profit be earned in this industry in the long run. Explain.
ii. State what market structure exists in since the early 2004. Explain if excess profit
will exist in the long run.
iii. Illustrate and explain how equilibrium is determined in the nuts industry since
2004.
iv. Are the firms in the industry operating efficiently in (i) the 1980s; and (ii)
presently? Explain.
v. Provide an explain one (1) strategy that the authorities can implement to curb
prices in the nuts market.

Step by stepSolved in 2 steps with 1 images

- In 2006, the five leading suppliers of digital cameras in the United States were Canon,Sony, Kodak, Olympus, and Samsung. The combined market share of these five firmswas 60.9 percent. The leading firm was Canon, with a market share of 18.7 percent. Theown price elasticity for Canon’s cameras was –4.0 and the market elasticity of demandwas –1.6. Suppose that in 2006, the average retail price of a Canon digital camera was$240 and that Canon’s marginal cost was $180 per camera. Suppose you were the CEO of Kodak, what would you do to avoid its business failure? Please apply the specific tools from managerial economics to the case analysisarrow_forwardAssuming you are the managing director of a firm that produces three goods: A, Band C. The price elasticity of demand for A is 1.2, for B it is 1.00 and for C it is 0.75.It is known that he firm is experiencing serious cash flow problems and you have toincrease total revenue as soon as possible. If you were in a position to set the pricesfor these goods, what would be your pricing strategy for each productarrow_forwardYou own Athleticon, which manufactures athletic wear. Your new contract with Atlanta United, a professional soccer team, allows Athleticon to be the sole suppler of athletic wear with the “Atlanta United” logo. No one lese can manufacture athletic wear with the “Atlanta United” logo. What do you think will be Athleticon’s level of profitability on the sale of “Atlanta United” athletic wear? Explain why. Your contract with Atlanta United only lasts 3 years. It was not renewed. Other firms can now manufacture athletic wear with the “Atlanta United” logo It is now 5 years after your contract with Atlanta United was terminated. Any manufacturer that wants to can manufacture and sell athletic wear with the “Atlanta United” logo. What do you think will be the level of profitability and rate of return on manufacturing athletic wear with the “Atlanta United” logo? Explain why.arrow_forward
- Inverse elasticity rule Use the first-order condition (Equation 15.2 ) for a Cournot firm to show that the usual inverse elasticity rule from Chapter 11 holds under Cournot competition (where the elasticity is associated with an individual firm's residual demand, the demand left after all rivals sell their output on the market). Manipulate Equation 15.2 in a different way to obtain an equivalent version of the inverse elasticity rule: pMCp=sieQ,p , where si=qi/Q is firm i's market share and eQp is the elasticity of market demand. Compare this version of the inverse elasticity rule with that for a monopolist from the previous chapter.arrow_forwardAside from advertising, how can monopolistically competitive films increase demand for their products?arrow_forwardWhich firm would an economist most likely label as an oligopolistarrow_forward
- MelCo’s Xamoff The global pharmaceuticals giant, MelCo, has had great success with Xamoff, and over-thecounter medicine that reduces exam-related anxiety. A patent currently protects Xamoff from competition, although rumors persist that similar products are in development. Two years ago, MelCo sold 25 million units for a price of $10 for a package of ten. Last year it raised the price to $11, and sales fell to 22 million units. Finally, a financial analyst estimates the cost of production at $2 per package. (a) Estimate the elasticity of demand for this product at $10. Is this price too high or too low? (b) Estimate the elasticity of demand for this product at $11. Is this price too high or too low? (c) Based on your answers to (a) and (b), what can we say about MelCo’s profit-maximizing price?arrow_forwardPlease help I do not know.arrow_forwardFirms J and K produce compact-disc players and compete againstone another. Each firm can develop either an economy player (E)or a deluxe player (D). According to the best available marketresearch, the firms’ resulting profits are given by the accompanyingpayoff table.a. The firms make their decision independently, and each is seeking itsown maximum profit. Is it possible to make a confident predictionconcerning their actions and the outcome? Explain.Firm KE DE 30, 55 50, 60 Firm JD 40, 75 25, 50b. Suppose that firm J has a lead in development and so can move first.What action should J take, and what will be K’s response?c. What will be the outcome if firm K can move first?arrow_forward
- Market Power and Monopoly - End of Chapter Problem Green Machine is the only greenhouse in isolated Point Barrow, Alaska, and therefore has a monopoly on the sale of fresh flowers. The manager estimates that the elasticity of demand for flowers is -0.5. Green Machine cannot be maximizing profits because O it is operating in the inelastic portion of its demand curve, so it can increase price and still gain more revenue while lowering cost. This will increase profits. according to the Lerner index an elasticity of demand of -0.5 means Green Machine's markup is 50% higher than what it should be, so it needs to decrease price and increase sales. elasticity of demand is negative; therefore, Green Machine's total costs are higher than its total revenue, and profits are not being maximized. O its marginal revenue must be greater than its marginal cost when elasticity of demand is between 0 and -1, so profits are not being maximized and it must expand production to increase sales and lower…arrow_forwardмсо 20 A profit-maximising firm produces homogenous (identical) units of output at a constant marginal cost and the units can be sold in two distinct market segments, which are segments A and B. On the assumption that the absolute value of the price elasticity of demand is lower in market segment A than it is in market segment B, if the firm decides to exercise price discrimination, we would expect to observe: A Ido not want to answer this question. В a higher price in market segment A to reflect the lower price elasticity the same price in both market segments since the marginal cost of production is the same for both markets and profits are maximised at MR = MC in both C markets D a higher price in market segment B to reflect the higher price elasticity E MR MC in market segment B because the higher elasticity allows a mark up of marginal revenue over marginal costarrow_forwardK DOJ and FTC use the Hertindahl-Hirschman Index as a measure of concentration. How is this calculated? By O A. adding up the market shares of all firms in the industry, squaring this number and then dividing by the number of firms in the industry. OB. determining the market shares of the four largest firms in the industry, but unlike the concentration ratio, the Index includes sales in the United States by foreig OC. squaring the four - firm concentration ratio of the industry and dividing this number by the total number of firms in the industry. D. squaring the market shares of each firm in an industry and then adding up the values of the squares.arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics 2eEconomicsISBN:9781947172364Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David ShapiroPublisher:OpenStaxMicroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506893Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning


