ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN: 9780190931919
Author: NEWNAN
Publisher: Oxford University Press
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Q97
Before the imposition of a tax, the equilibrium price and quantity are $15 and 100, respectively. After the imposition of a unit tax of $3, the market equilibrium adjusts to a price of $18 and quantity of 100. Based on this information, ...
a.
Price elasticity of supply is 0 and therefore the entire tax incidence falls on the consumer.
b.
Price elasticity of supply is 1 and therefore the entire tax incidence falls on the seller.
c.
Price elasticity of demand is 1 and therefore the tax incidence falls entirely on the seller.
d.
Price elasticity of demand is 0 and therefore the entire tax incidence falls on the consumer.
e.
The tax incidence is shared equally by the seller and the consumer.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Step by stepSolved in 2 steps
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Question 2: Imposing a single-stage tax Assume that there are 1000 importers and manufacturers, 2,000 wholesalers, and 10,000 retailers. Each manufacturer (importer) has sales of $30,000,000 which is sold equally across wholesalers, and wholesalers put a 20% markup on the price before selling to retailers Then the goods are resold equally to 10,000 retailers and the retailers impose a 25% markup on it. Suppose the government needs to raise 4.5 billion with a single- stage sales tax, a. What would be the rate of tax the government needs to impose on the sales of importers and manufacturers to achieve the revenue target. b. What would be the rate of tax the government needs to impose on the sales of wholesalers to achieve the revenue target?arrow_forwardConsider a market where supply and demand curves are given by Q = 4P and Q = 12 - 2P. Calculate the equilibrium price and quantity in this market. Now consider a government that collects a unit tax of 0.2 liras for every unit of good sold in the market from the producers. What is the new supply curve? What is the new market equilibrium quantity? What is the price that consumers pay? What is the price producers get? What is the tax incidence on consumers? producers?arrow_forwardQ)Economics If the tax elasticity of supply is 0.16, by how much will the quantity supplied increase when the marginal tax rate decreases from 40 to 36 percent?arrow_forward
- Q3 Consider the following demand and supply equations Q subscript d open parentheses P close parentheses equals 2410 minus 3 P Q subscript S open parentheses P close parentheses equals 100 plus 12 P Suppose that the government imposes a $30 tax on the product Assume that the sellers collect the tax from buyers and submit the tax to the government Calculate the price that sellers receive after the tax is imposed (i.e., the price excluding the per unit tax they submit to the government)arrow_forwardCan you also show on diagrams please?arrow_forwardConsider the supply and demand functions graphed below. Price 100 75 70 60 10 56 Supply Demand 20 Quantity Suppose a demand-side tax is imposed. As a result of the tax, the new equilibrium quantity is 5. What is the price paid by consumers? $60 What is the price received by producers? $ How much is the tax that was imposed? How much tax revenue is collected? Which side of the market pays more of the tax? This side of the market pays more of the tax because SA A 4 4) (arrow_forward
- Doyle and Samphantharak (2008) find that when a 5% gas tax is implemented, prices consumers pay for gas increase by about 4%. What role does demand elasticity play in determining the size of this price change? That is, under what demand elasticity cases would the price change be closer to 5%, or closer to 0%? Illustrate and explain using supply-and-demand graph(s)..arrow_forwardNow assume the government raises the tax from $1.00 to $1.50. This causes sale to decline from 10,000 units to 5,000 units. a) calculate the price(tax) elasticity of demand. b) is it elastic, inelastic, or unit elastic? c) what happens to total tax revenue?arrow_forwardWhich of the following statements is correct regarding a tax on a good and the resulting deadweight loss? The greater are the price elasticities of supply and demand, the greater is the deadweight loss. The greater is the price elasticity of supply and the smaller is the price elasticity of demand, the greater is the deadweight loss. The smaller are the decreases in quantity demanded and quantity supplied, the greater the deadweight loss. The smaller is the wedge between the effective price to sellers and the effective price to buyers, the greater is the deadweight loss.arrow_forward
- Can you explain with graphs as well pleasearrow_forwardSuppose in the market for cigarettes, the price elasticity of supply is 2.4 and the price elasticity of demand is −0.8. If an excise tax is imposed on sellers of cigarettes, then _____. a buyers and sellers will pay equal shares of the tax b buyers will pay a greater share of the tax than sellers will c buyers will pay the whole tax d sellers will pay a greater share of the tax than buyers will e sellers will pay the whole taxarrow_forwardSuppose that the equilibrium quantity in the market for gadgets has been 85,000 per month. Then a tax of $6 per gadget is imposed on gadgets. As a result, the price paid by buyers increases by $4 and the after-tax price received (and kept) by sellers falls by $2. Given this tax imposition, the government is able to raise $481,740 per month in tax revenue. We can conclude that the imposition of the tax (x) has caused a deadweight loss by an amount more than $13,750 but less than $14,500 per month. (y) has reduced the equilibrium quantity of gadgets by more than 4,450 but less than 4,675 gadgets per month. (z) has reduced consumer surplus by more than $328,750 per month and has reduced producer surplus by more than $164,775 per month.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education