Q- how were power and influence used to produce or attempt to produce particular outcomes for indiviuals?
The governing body for world football, FIFA, reached a contentious decision in 2010 to hold the World Cup in Qatar in 2022. In the final round of voting, 14 votes went to Qatar and 8 to the USA. Qatar has no tradition of football, littleb football infrastructure and summer temperatures too severe for competitive high- quality football. Furthermore, before reaching its decision, FIFA's executive committee (exco) was briefed that Qatar was at a high risk of terrorist attack. Investigative journalism in 2014 raised some serious concerns about the processes leading up to the Qatar decision. At the centre of the concerns were claims of bribery and corruption. Allegations were made that substantial sums of money, valuable gifts and junkets made their way from Qatar…
Afew days before the presidential ballot was due, BH was summoned to appear before FIFA's ethics committee; an event which killed any hope BH had of getting the top job. FIFA announced that both BH and a senior exco member were suspended from all activities in football pending a full investigation. FIFA's ethics
committee found evidence of wrongdoing and banned BH for life. On appeal, this ban was overturned at which point BH announced his retirement from involvement in football. Sometime afterwards, following further investigations, the ethics committee banned BH again from life involvement in the game. AW, who had been president of the North, Central American and Caribbean football confederation and vice-president of FIFA, resigned in 2011 following corruption and bribery charges. Several senior figures attacked FIFA for not representing world football, having long-standing traditions of bribery and corruption and sham investigations in which people were not properly investigated. Concerned at allegations against it, FIFA appointed a former police officer as a new security adviser. After two years, he and his team left FIFA for a new sports security
post in Qatar. Their investigation of FIFA's senior officials and regional governing bodies reportedly concluded by saying:
⚫ of the president, JB, he is ruthless, greedy, manipulative and prepared to compromise everything for personal ambition;
⚫of the secretary-general, he is ruthless and charmingly arrogant;
⚫ of the head of legal services, he is consummately loyal and protective of men at the top even when he disagrees with them
⚫ of the European Confederation, it is historically influential but serious corruption issues exist;
⚫ of the African Confederation, manipulated throughout for decades;
⚫ of the Asian Confederation, marred by involvement in the Qatar bid (BH was its president for nine years);
of the North and Central American Confederation, poor reputation and the Caribbean has been manipulated for decades; of the South American Confederation, it is led by long-serving octogenarians
(80+), will never show leadership and will be the last to change.
Further reporting claimed that after the 2010 World Cup in South Africa the 22 exco members were each given a $200,000 bonus. This was on top of their $100,000 salary for their part-time position and $750 per day allowances when working for FIFA. The money was paid into either executives' personal accounts or Swiss bank accounts. The $200,000 windfall was announced to exco the day before the Qatar decision was made. FIFA later announced that bonus payments would be stopped but at about the same time, and without saying, doubled the pay given to committee members.
Later there were calls for Qatar to lose the right to hold the World Cup and for the event to switch to another country. Qatar insisted that BH, who is a Qatari, never had any official role in supporting the Qatari bid and that he always acted independently. FIFA responded to corruption allegations from Britain by saying that they were grounded in racism and discrimination. At dawn on the eve of FIFA's 65th Congress in Switzerland, USA law officials have arrested seven senior FIFA,officials on charges of corruption. Speculation was that the FIFA president might lose the election the next day. However, this was not the case and he won.
Step by stepSolved in 3 steps
- Could you please explain this so that it makes more sense. "The U.S. government is considering cutting tariffs on imported running shoes. In another case, however, the U.S. government is running in the opposite direction: they want to cut imports of solar panels from China. The rubber meets the road, so to speak, when the topic of running shoes comes up. Maine manufacturer New Balance hates the idea of freer trade. The company currently benefits from tariffs, in some cases reaching more than 60 percent on shoes manufactured in Vietnam. New Balance pays its workers in Maine more than $10/hour, while Vietnamese shoe makers are paying their employees 46¢/hour. Nike would like to import more of its U.S.-designed shoes from Vietnam so consumers could pay lower prices. Nike argues that lower tariffs will create high-paying jobs in the United States for positions from designers to product engineers. Nike and other supporters of new free trade agreements argue that tariff barriers that save…arrow_forwardstrategic use of counter trade schemes as a marketing weapon to generate export revenue How might a company make strategic use of countertrade schemes as a marketing weapon to generate export revenue? Is Starbucks coffee addicted in other countries just like in the US? Do other countries children drink Starbucks coffee like the US children What age do they start drinking coffee overseas?arrow_forwardwhat is the comparative advantage and strategy for Airbus, and its A380.arrow_forward
- Up to 2013 Southwest Airlines had not expanded outside the U.S., although in 2013, Southwest’s CEO remarked that “opportunities for growth now lie beyond US borders”.Evaluate possible international strategy approaches (multi-domestic, global or transnational) and select which strategy Southwest should pursue to achieve successarrow_forwardThe 25-year-old NAFTA agreement is set to be replaced with a new agreement, the USMCA. Which countries belong to NAFTA and, going forwa USMCA?arrow_forwardREFER TO IMAGE 1. a, b, and c represent possible outcomes of NAFTA re-negotiations. Which of these outcomes is both within the win set and Pareto-optimal? a b c All of the above None of the above 2. In the previous question, which of the following best describes the policy changes resulting from NAFTA re-negotiation? a. Both US and Mexican tariffs fall b. Both US and Mexican tariffs rise c. US tariffs rise and Mexican tariffs fall d. US tariffs fall and Mexican tariffs rise e. Neither US nor Mexican tariffs changearrow_forward
- Understanding BusinessManagementISBN:9781259929434Author:William NickelsPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationManagement (14th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134527604Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. CoulterPublisher:PEARSONSpreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...ManagementISBN:9781305947412Author:Cliff RagsdalePublisher:Cengage Learning
- Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...ManagementISBN:9780135191798Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. LaudonPublisher:PEARSONBusiness Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...ManagementISBN:9780134728391Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. GriffinPublisher:PEARSONFundamentals of Management (10th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134237473Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De CenzoPublisher:PEARSON