Pulmonary Disease. Suppose a 1980 study was conducted whose purpose was to compare the indoor air quality in offices where smoking was permitted with that in offices where smoking was not permitted. Measurements were made of carbon monoxide (CO) at 1:20 p.m. in 40 work areas where smoking was permitted and in 40 work areas where smoking was not permitted. Where smoking was permitted, the mean CO level was 11,7 parts per million (ppm) and the standard deviation CO was 7.4 ppm. Where smoking was not permitted, the mean CO was 6.6 ppm and the standard deviation CO was 2.8 ppm. (Let population 1 be smoking was permitted and population 2 be smoking was not permitted.) (a) Test for whether the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments. (Use a 0.05.) State the null and alternative hypotheses (in ppm). (Enter 1- for as needed.) Ho Find the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.) Find the p-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.) p-value= State your conclusion. Fail to reject Ho There is insufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments, O Reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments. Fail to reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments. Reject He. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
Pulmonary Disease.
Suppose a 1980 study was conducted whose purpose was to compare the indoor air quality in offices where smoking was permitted with that in offices where
smoking was not permitted. Measurements were made of carbon monoxide (CO) at 1:20 p.m. in 40 work areas where smoking was permitted and in 40 work
areas where smoking was not permitted. Where smoking was permitted, the mean CO level was 11.7 parts per million (ppm) and the standard deviation CO was
7.4 ppm. Where smoking was not permitted, the mean CO was 6.6 ppm and the standard deviation CO was 2.8 ppm. (Let population 1 be smoking was permitted
and population 2 be smoking was not permitted.).
(a) Test for whether the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments. (Use a 0.05.)
State the null and alternative hypotheses (in ppm). (Enter 1- for as needed.)
Find the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.)
Find the p-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.)
p-value=
State your conclusion.
O Fail to reject H. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments.
O Reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments.
O Fail to reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments.
Reject Ho. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments.
Transcribed Image Text:Pulmonary Disease. Suppose a 1980 study was conducted whose purpose was to compare the indoor air quality in offices where smoking was permitted with that in offices where smoking was not permitted. Measurements were made of carbon monoxide (CO) at 1:20 p.m. in 40 work areas where smoking was permitted and in 40 work areas where smoking was not permitted. Where smoking was permitted, the mean CO level was 11.7 parts per million (ppm) and the standard deviation CO was 7.4 ppm. Where smoking was not permitted, the mean CO was 6.6 ppm and the standard deviation CO was 2.8 ppm. (Let population 1 be smoking was permitted and population 2 be smoking was not permitted.). (a) Test for whether the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments. (Use a 0.05.) State the null and alternative hypotheses (in ppm). (Enter 1- for as needed.) Find the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.) Find the p-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.) p-value= State your conclusion. O Fail to reject H. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments. O Reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments. O Fail to reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments. Reject Ho. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of CO is significantly different in the two types of working environments.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 6 steps with 12 images

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman