pts Jennifer is interested in the relationship between sales (Y in $1,000) and advertising expense (X in $1,000). Using sample data, she developed the following regression model: y-hat 4.4X. What is the estimated sales volume (in dollars) if the advertising expense is $150,000? Round to the nearest whole number. <= 55+

The data show the chest size and weight of several bears. Find the regression equation, letting chest size be the independent (x) variable. Then find the best predicted weight of a bear with a chest size of 40 inches. Is the result close to the actual weight of 352 pounds? Use a significance level of 0.05. Chest size (inches) *Weight (pounds) 44 54 328 528 41 55 39 51 418 580 296 503 Click the icon to view the critical values of the Pearson correlation coefficient r. - What is the regression equation? x (Round to one decimal place as needed.)

Using the data,  run a regression where you control for “Promotion,” and test the effect of “Wins” on “Attendance”.  What should be the attendance if the number of wins is 10?     Wins Promotion Attendance 4 29500 36300 6 55700 40100 6 71300 41200 8 87000 53000 6 75000 44000 7 72000 45600 5 55300 39000 7 81600 47500

The data show the number of viewers for television stars with certain salaries. Find the regression equation, letting salary be the independent (x) variable. Find the best predicted number of viewers for a television star with a salary of $7 million. Is the result close to the actual number of viewers, 5.2 million? Use a significance level of 0.05. Salary (millions of $) 108 14 5 8 5.1 4.3 7.8 2.5 Viewers (millions) Click the icon to view the critical values of the Pearson correlation coefficient r. What is the regression equation? y=+x (Round to three decimal places as needed.) X 1 1 5 8 5.7 8.2 10.9 4.4

A researcher that there is a linear association between the level of potassium content (y) in milligrams and the amount of fiber (x) in grams in cereal. The regression line for the data is computed to y=37+28x rate. It was also computed that r=.59 A. What does the value . 59 tell you? B. What does the value 37 tell you? C. What does the value 28 tell you ? 2. For the line in question 1 what percentage of variability in potassium can be explained by variability in fiber?

The arm span and foot length were both measured (in centimeters) for each of 20 students in a biology class. The computer output displays the regression analysis.   Which of the following is the best interpretation of the coefficient of determination r2? About 37% of the variation in arm span is accounted for by the linear relationship formed with the foot length. About 65% of the variation in foot length is accounted for by the linear relationship formed with the arm span. About 63% of the variation in arm span is accounted for by the linear relationship formed with the foot length. About 63% of the variation in foot length is accounted for by the linear relationship formed with the arm span.

We run the following regression using a sample of 148 women living in the western states. The variable wage is the hourly wage ( in USD) and educ is the number of years of education completed.             wage  =  -3.07   +   1.52 educ         Which statement best described the estimated slope coefficient? Group of answer choices A 1.52 extra years of education is predicted to increase wage by 1 USD An extra year of education is predicted to increase hourly wage by 1.52 USD A 1 percent increase in education is predicted to increase wage by 1.52 percent A 1.52 percent increase in education is predicted to increase wage by 1

Using the data,  run a regression where you control for “Promotion,” and test the effect of “Wins” on “Attendance”.  Does “Promotion” have a significant effect on “Attendance”?   Wins Promotion Attendance 4 29500 36300 6 55700 40100 6 71300 41200 8 87000 53000 6 75000 44000 7 72000 45600 5 55300 39000 7 81600 47500

In simple linear regression, the coefficient of determination measures: a.The amount of variability of the y variable that is explained by the x variable b.The amount of variability of the x variable that is explained by the y variable c.The amount of variability between the treatments d.The amount of variability within the treatments