Problem 1:For a gravel with D60 0.48mm, D30 0.25mm, and D10coefficient and the coefficient of gradation. Is it a well-graded or poorly graded soil?-===0.11mm, calculate the uniformityProblem 2:0.3 mm, D30The following values for a sand are given: D10Determine Cu and Cc and state if it is a well-graded or a poorly graded soil.=0.41 mm, and D60 ==0.77 mm.

The uniformity coefficient is given as:The coefficient of gradation is given as:Considered together,…

Problem 1: 0.48mm, D30 0.25mm, and D10 For a gravel with D60 coefficient and the coefficient of gradation. Is it a well-graded or poorly graded soil? = = 0.11mm, calculate the uniformity Problem 2: The following values for a sand are given: D10 = 0.3 mm, D30 = 0.41 mm, and D60 Determine Cu and Cc and state if it is a well-graded or a poorly graded soil. = 0.77 mm.

Problem 1: 0.48mm, D30 0.25mm, and D10 For a gravel with D60 coefficient and the coefficient of gradation. Is it a well-graded or poorly graded soil? = = 0.11mm, calculate the uniformity Problem 2: The following values for a sand are given: D10 = 0.3 mm, D30 = 0.41 mm, and D60 Determine Cu and Cc and state if it is a well-graded or a poorly graded soil. = 0.77 mm.

Structural Analysis

6th Edition

ISBN:9781337630931

Author:KASSIMALI, Aslam.

Publisher:KASSIMALI, Aslam.

Chapter2: Loads On Structures

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

2b. The following data was obtained from Sieve Analysis conducted at a Soil Lab. Using the data given in Table 02 determine: Table 02: Sieve analysis data of coarse-grained soil i. ii. iii. + Sieve Opening (mm) 20 10 4.75 2.36 1.18 0.6 0.3 0.15 0.075 Pan Mass of Soil Retaining on each Sieve (g) 5.21 20.21 180.21 360.21 280.11 70.11 50.21 17.21 10.11 8 Percentage of clay, silt, sand and Gravel in the soil sample Uniformity coefficient and coefficient of curvature Classify the soil according to BS soil classification system
Q': A- Classification tests have been performed on a soil sample and the grading curve that shown in (Fig. 1) and Atterberg limits obtained. Classify the soil using the USCS? L.L=32 and P.L=26 100 80 60 40 20 Fig. 1 0.1 1 Particle size (mm) 0.0001 0.001 0.01 10 100 % Finer
Estimate the value of coefficient of permeability for a uniform graded sand of size D₁0 = 0.15 mm obtained from sieve analysis. G = 2.67. 10
Q1: Use the USCS to Classify the soil sample with the following data: % passing 4.75 mm Sieve = 64 % passing 75- Sieve =4 Uniformity Coefficient= 7.5 Coefficient of Curvature=2.7 Plasticity index = 2.5 Solution: Q2: Use the USCS to Classify the soil samples with the following data dalla Soil LL PL Group Symbol Soil Name 15 35 25 ABC 8. ८८ 25 45 65 2-Seepage velocity (m/s) = 70 3- Flow rate in (m3/s) = oss and dry ng www Parmbly & volume change decrease Campering wes Toughness and dry strength dease Presby & val change in 10 20 30 40 50- 60 Liepakt. 70 80 Atra -0.73 (W₂-201 90 Q3: For the soil shown below the hydraulic conductivity is (3 m/day). The sample diameter is 1.5 m. The porosity is (30%). Find: 1- Flow velocity (m/s)== 100 110 120 Soil 4 m ITE
Following are the results of a field unit-weight determination test performed on the same soil by means of the sand cone method: -Calibrated dry unit weight of Ottawa sand = 15.4019 kn/m3 -Calibrated weight of Ottawa sand to fill the cone = 5.3496 N -Weightof jar + cone + sand (before use) = 74.451 N -Weightof jar + cone + sand (after use) = 46.886 N -Weight of moist soil from hole = 29.509 N -Moisture content of moist soil = 10.21% DETERMINE AND SHOW COMPLETE SOLUTION 1. Dry density of compaction in the field in kg/cu.m.
please solve question 4, 5 and 6
2.4 The following are the results of a sieve analysis. 2.1 For a gravel with Dg = 0.48 mm, D = 0.25 mm, and Dn = 0.11 mm, calculate the uniformity coefficient and the coefficient of gradation. Is it a well-graded or a poorly graded soil? 2.2 The following values for a sand are given: Dn = 0.3 mm, D = 0.41 mm, and D = 0.77 mm. Determine C, and C, and state if it is a well-graded or a poorly-graded soil. U.S. sieve no. Mass of soil retained (g) 4. 10 18.5 20 532 40 90.5 60 818 100 92.2 200 585 Pan 26.5 a. Determine the percent finer than cach sieve and plot a grain-size distri- bution curve. b. Determine Dg. Dy. and D, for each soil. . Calculate the uniformity coefficient C d. Calculate the coefficient of gradation C,.
Q1: A. Answer in True or False 1. A soil has a Cu =1, then it is considered as a poorly graded soll. 2. A soil has L.L-60% and P.L-35%, then it plots a point below the A-line in the plasticity car 3. A soil described with a symbol (SP) has % passing No. 200 sieve more than 50% 4. Decreasing water content below shrinkage limit is accompanied with a decreasing in void ra 5. Water molecules are considered polar and known as dipoles. 6. Dry Density is the smallest density. 7. Capillary rise is directly proportional to the pore channel diameter. 8. The unconfined compressive strength is twice the undrained cohesion. 9. Piping or boiling occurs when effective stress equals to zero. 10. It is assumed that the secondary compression begins when the primary conso
Classify: A sample of well-graded gravel with sand has 73% fine to coarse sub-angular gravel, 23% fine to coarse sub-angular sand, and 4% fines. The maximum size of the particles is 75 mm. The coefficient of curvature is 2.7, while the uniformity coefficient is 12.4.
No.3
The following data are the results of a sieve analysis. Determine the percentage of silt and clay combined using Unified Classification System. Mass of soil Sieve no. Opening retained (mm) on each sieve 4 4.75 21.5 10 2 18.5 20 0.85 53.2 40 0.425 90.5 60 0.25 81.8 100 0.15 92.2 200 0.075 58.5 Pan 26.5 Select one: а. 19 b. none of the choices С. 6 d. 17 e. 58
The results of a compaction test on the sample of soil that are to be listed are to be used for an embankment on a highway project are listed below . Determine the maximum dry unit weight of compaction and the optimum moisture content. The table is shown in image