On its face, the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause only applies to: Group of answer choices regulatory takings. physical takings. actions by private landowners. the federal government.

You are the chief ethics officer of a multinational social networking website. You receive reports from multiple employees working within the company that data of customers who have left the network (Those who cancelled their social network profile) is still being used by the company, and the company does not monitor the ad content properly for hate, and illegal content. What would you do with the information obtained? Explain and provide appropriate reasoning. Take into consideration the legal/ethical implications of your decision.

What are the ethical and potential legal claims regarding plagiarism with respect to the preparation of legal documents?

Allied Auto Insurance Company does not tell its new customers when they are being charged higher premiums as a result of their credit scores. This is a violation of the United States Constitution the Fair Credit Reporting Act The Federal Trade Commission rules The Food and Drug Act

Recording Which of the following options would provide coverage for claims resulting from slander? OA Personal Injury Liability Contractual Liability Liquor Liability Bodily Injury Liability

Acme Co. does not want to install an elevator in their building to provide access to a second floor storage loft since only one of their seventy-five employees might need elevator access. Acme's best defense to a charge of discrimination would be _____.     infrequency of use     undue hardship     unreasonable accommodation     undue expense

Which of these is not a consumer responsibility? O Read and follow instructions O Speak up O Lawfully purchase and obtain goods and services O Proper use of products and services Responsibility to be heard O Inform oneself

I need five case sof intoxication in contract law under the UK sysrtem. Contracts that were supposedly signed while intoxicated.

Give typed explanation  Kawal, a young mother with three small children, had worked at the counter of a Tim Hortons store for three years. One day, the manager observed Kawal giving a Timbit donut to a crying child who came into the store with their parents. When the manager of the store confronted Kawal about giving a donut away for free, Kawal immediately admitted to giving the donut away to the customer without paying for it. She was aware that this was against the employer’s policy, but she had been busy at the time and did not go to her purse to get the $1.50 to pay for the donut at that time. Also, knowing that day-old donuts are given away to small children in the store regularly, she felt this would be acceptable. Kawal expected to get a warning at most and was shocked when her manager terminated her employment for cause. Sarah filed a wrongful dismissal case. (PLEASE NOTE: I am not looking for your opinion. Use concepts discussed in class or your textbook to provide an…

Discuss the consequences of a government ban on advertising food products to children ages 17 and younger.