Object-oriented design approaches should be set up so that modelling takes precedence over procedure. Please give me one excellent explanation.

When it comes to object-oriented programming, why is it required to put in more work and coding in order to avoid having classes that are needlessly linked? What are the three most important reasons for your stance?

An object-oriented design approach frames everything in terms of objects. How may a large (or complex) thing be divided into its constituent parts?

The methods to object-oriented design that are selected need to be designed in such a way that modelling is given priority over process. Present the argument in its most compelling form.

Setting up the object-oriented design methodologies employed such that they prioritise modelling over procedure is essential. Give me one convincing argument.

Anywhere it makes sense to do so, object-oriented design need to be used. When the circumstances warrant it, the use of structured design is acceptable as an option. what may possibly be the cause of this, etc.

The object-oriented design methods that are used should be set up so that they put more focus on modelling and less on process. Give me one strong case.

Object-oriented design needs to be used whenever it makes sense to do so. Structured design is a choice that can be used when the situation calls for it. what might be making this happen, etc.

Object-oriented design should be employed where it makes sense. When necessary, using a more formal approach to a design problem is a good idea. why is this happening, etc.

Object-oriented design should be employed whenever it makes sense to do so, which is pretty much everything. When the conditions call for it, the use of structured design is an alternative that may be considered appropriate. what are some of the possible explanations for this, etc.