n Brooks v. Lewin Realty III, Inc., the Md Ct App held that for plaintiff to make out a prima facie case, she must show that (select the best answer): O the plaintiff did not cause the violation of the ordinance, that plaintiff did not contribute to the injury, and that the injury was suffered by a contractor trying to repair the walkway to the house O if not repaired, a violation of an ordinance may occur, an injury is possible if the condition of the house is not repaired, and that the legislature sought to increase the tax base of the rental house or unit involved Othere is a violation of an ordinance, that the violation proximately caused an injury, and that the injured plaintiff was in a class of people intended to be protected by the ordinance O it was not her fault that the paint in the dwelling was peeling, that the peeling paint was lead paint, and that there was someone who was injured in the past by this landlord

icon
Related questions
Question
In Brooks v. Lewin Realty III, Inc., the Md Ct App held that for plaintiff to
make out a prima facie case, she must show that (select the best
answer):
O the plaintiff did not cause the violation of the ordinance, that plaintiff did not
contribute to the injury, and that the injury was suffered by a contractor
trying to repair the walkway to the house
if not repaired, a violation of an ordinance may occur, an injury is possible if
the condition of the house is not repaired, and that the legislature sought to
increase the tax base of the rental house or unit involved
Othere is a violation of an ordinance, that the violation proximately caused an
injury, and that the injured plaintiff was in a class of people intended to be
protected by the ordinance
O it was not her fault that the paint in the dwelling was peeling, that the
peeling paint was lead paint, and that there was someone who was injured in
the past by this landlord
Transcribed Image Text:In Brooks v. Lewin Realty III, Inc., the Md Ct App held that for plaintiff to make out a prima facie case, she must show that (select the best answer): O the plaintiff did not cause the violation of the ordinance, that plaintiff did not contribute to the injury, and that the injury was suffered by a contractor trying to repair the walkway to the house if not repaired, a violation of an ordinance may occur, an injury is possible if the condition of the house is not repaired, and that the legislature sought to increase the tax base of the rental house or unit involved Othere is a violation of an ordinance, that the violation proximately caused an injury, and that the injured plaintiff was in a class of people intended to be protected by the ordinance O it was not her fault that the paint in the dwelling was peeling, that the peeling paint was lead paint, and that there was someone who was injured in the past by this landlord
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer