ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN: 9780190931919
Author: NEWNAN
Publisher: Oxford University Press
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Mega Dynamics is considering the following two projects which have a cost of capital of 11%. What is the NPV of the Flying Car project?
The cash flows for each project are given below:
WACC = | 11% | |
Time | Flying Car | Electric Car |
0 | -180,000 | -100,000 |
1 | 30,000 | 25,000 |
2 | 50,000 | 30,000 |
3 | 75,000 | 40,000 |
4 | 110,000 | 50,000 |
A. |
14,908 |
|
B. |
8,158 |
|
C. |
13,431 |
|
D. |
9,055 |
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Step by stepSolved in 2 steps
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Consider the following two mutually exclusive projects being considered by an agency. The agency's MARR is 6% per year and the projects have a service life of 5 years. Initial cost Annual revenues Present Worth (PW) Answer the following questions. Project 1 $14,200 $3,832 $1,942 Project 2 $21,700 $5,637 $2,045 a. Based on the PW, the project that is more economical is Project 2 (Enter the project number). b. Calculate the IRR of each alternative (use the trial-and-error method) The IRR of Project 1 is % (Round to the nearest one decimal place) The IRR of Project 2 is% (Round to the nearest one decimal place) c. Perform the incremental IRR analysis to determine the project that is more economical: Incremental IRR =% (Round to the nearest one decimal place); Therefore, based on the incremental IRR, Project 2 is more economical.arrow_forward1. Tom International LLC has developed pessimistic, most likely, and optimistic estimates for a project. The cost and benefit data are given in the table below. What is the expected NPW for this project? MARR = 10% Data Pessimistic Most Likely Optimistic 1,000 First Cost, $ Benefits/ Year, $ Life, Years A. $1,420 B. C. D. $1,813 $1,217 $1,580 1,500 250 6 450 8 800 500 10arrow_forwardAnswer both parts...arrow_forward
- A proposed project has the following costs and benefits. Using linear interpolation, the project’s discounted payback period (use i=10%) is _____________. Year Costs Benefits 0 $4,000 1 $1,200 2 $1,200 3 1,000 4 1,000 5 3,000 6 2,000 A. 6.35 years B. 5.82 years C. 4.24 years D. 3.37 yearsarrow_forward6.1 A dam is proposed on a stretch of wild river, a river that is currently used for recreation. The dam will generate electricity. The dam will have a useful life of 50 years, after which its reservoir will be full of sediment and the dam will need to be removed. The following are characteristics of the dam: Initial Cost: $100,000,000 Electricity produced: 100,000 MWh per year at $100/Mwh Cost of decommissioning dam: $10,000,000 Value of recreation lost: $5,000,000 per year Assume that costs and benefits accrue at the end of each period. a. If the social discount rate is 3% per year, is the dam a good idea? b. If the social discount rate is 10% per year, is the dam a good idea? c. Calculate the "cutoff" discount rate, c, such that the dam is a good idea for discount rates rc and a bad idea for discount rates r > c.arrow_forwardConsider the following two mutually exclusive projects being considered by an agency. The agency's MARR is 5% per year and the projects have a service life of 5 years. Initial cost Annual revenues Present Worth (PW) Answer the following questions. Project 1 $14,200 $3,832 O A. No B. Yes $2,391 Project 2 $21,700 $5,608 $2,580 a. Based on the PW, the project that is more economical is Project b. Calculate the IRR of each alternative (use the trial-and-error method) % (Round to the nearest one decimal place) The IRR of Project 1 is The IRR of Project 2 is % (Round to the nearest one decimal place) (Enter the project number). c. Perform the incremental IRR analysis to determine the project that is more economical: Incremental IRR =% (Round to the nearest one decimal place); Therefore, based on the incremental IRR, Project is more economical. d. Do the two methods produce the same recomendation for the most economical project?arrow_forward
- I need the answer in 10 minutes pleasearrow_forwardYou have been asked to perform an economic evaluation of two projects and recommend one of them for implementation. The project parameters are as follows: Project A Project B Discount Rate 4.0% 4.0% Your analysis concludes that: Project Cost $1,000,000 $750,000 Project Life (yrs) 10 15 Elec. Savings Elec. Cost (kWh/yr) ($/kWh) 800,000 600,000 O Project A is preferable, but Project B also has attractive performance. O Project B is preferable, but Project A also has attractive performance. O Project B is preferable and Project A results in a net loss. O Project A is preferable and Project B results in a net loss. $0.12 $0.12 Annual Cost Escalation Rate 1.5% 1.5%arrow_forwardThe wow great expert Hand written solution is not allowedarrow_forward
- Two mutually exclusive projects are under consideration: Year Project A Project B -$5,200 -$7,500 1 2,800 1,000 2 2,800 2,500 3 2,800 4,000 4 2,800 5,500 5 2,800 7,000 Which project should be selected if the simple payback method is used to make the determination? Not enough information B; its payback period is longer O A; its payback period is shorterarrow_forwardA county in Tennessee is considering the following public interest project. Initial Cost $22.5M Annual Maintenance Cost $525K EUAB $3.3M Given a useful life of 12 years and an interest rate of 4%, the benefit /cost ratio is _____________________. Group of answer choices 1.01 1.13 1.51 1.67 1.48arrow_forwardD2arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education