Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Math
Statistics
It is well known, and scientifically documented, that yawning is contagious. When we see someone else yawn, or even think about someone yawning, we are very likely to yawn ourselves. (In fact, we predict that you are starting to want to yawn right now.) In a study of yawning contagion, researchers showed participants one of several pictures, including a picture of a man yawning, the same man smiling, a yawning man with his mouth covered, or a yawning man with his eyes obscured (Provine et al. 1989). Participants yawned much more often when shown the yawner than the smiler, but surprisingly an identical number also yawned when shown the picture with the mouth obscured. This suggests that something besides the mouth is an important trigger. What about the eyes? Seventeen of 30 participants yawned when confronted with a picture of a yawning man, while 11 of 30 independent participants yawned when shown a picture of a yawning man with his eyes covered. Is there evidence in these data that covering the yawning man's eyes in an image changes the occurrence of contagious yawns? To answer this question, perform the x? contingency test. The null and alternative hypotheses are as follows: Họ: Covering the eyes and frequency of yawning are independent. HA: Covering the eyes and frequency of yawning are not independent. State the conclusion and the interpretation of the x? contingency test. Reject Ho. There is insufficient evidence at the level of significance a = 0.05 that the probability of yawning is contingent on covering the eyes. Reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence at the level of significance a = 0.05 that the probability of yawning is contingent on covering the eyes. Fail to reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence at the level of significance a = 0.05 that the probability of yawning is contingent on covering the eyes. Fail to reject Ho. There is insufficient evidence at the level of significance a = 0.05 that the probability of yawning is contingent on covering the eyes.

It is well known, and scientifically documented, that yawning is contagious. When we see someone else yawn, or even think about someone yawning, we are very likely to yawn ourselves. (In fact, we predict that you are starting to want to yawn right now.) In a study of yawning contagion, researchers showed participants one of several pictures, including a picture of a man yawning, the same man smiling, a yawning man with his mouth covered, or a yawning man with his eyes obscured (Provine et al. 1989). Participants yawned much more often when shown the yawner than the smiler, but surprisingly an identical number also yawned when shown the picture with the mouth obscured. This suggests that something besides the mouth is an important trigger. What about the eyes? Seventeen of 30 participants yawned when confronted with a picture of a yawning man, while 11 of 30 independent participants yawned when shown a picture of a yawning man with his eyes covered. Is there evidence in these data that covering the yawning man's eyes in an image changes the occurrence of contagious yawns? To answer this question, perform the x? contingency test. The null and alternative hypotheses are as follows: Họ: Covering the eyes and frequency of yawning are independent. HA: Covering the eyes and frequency of yawning are not independent. State the conclusion and the interpretation of the x? contingency test. Reject Ho. There is insufficient evidence at the level of significance a = 0.05 that the probability of yawning is contingent on covering the eyes. Reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence at the level of significance a = 0.05 that the probability of yawning is contingent on covering the eyes. Fail to reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence at the level of significance a = 0.05 that the probability of yawning is contingent on covering the eyes. Fail to reject Ho. There is insufficient evidence at the level of significance a = 0.05 that the probability of yawning is contingent on covering the eyes.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question
It is well known, and scientifically documented, that yawning is contagious. When we see someone else yawn, or even think about someone yawning, we are very likely to yawn ourselves. (In fact, we predict that you are starting to want to yawn right now.) In a study of yawning contagion, researchers showed participants one of several pictures, including a picture of a man yawning, the same man smiling, a yawning man with his mouth covered, or a yawning man with his eyes obscured (Provine et al. 1989). Participants yawned much more often when shown the yawner than the smiler, but surprisingly an identical number also yawned when shown the picture with the mouth obscured. This suggests that something besides the mouth is an important trigger. What about the eyes? Seventeen of 30 participants yawned when confronted with a picture of a yawning man, while 11 of 30 independent participants yawned when shown a picture of a yawning man with his eyes covered. Is there evidence in these data that covering the yawning man's eyes in an image changes the occurrence of contagious yawns? To answer this question, perform the x contingency test. The null and alternative hypotheses are as follows: Họ: Covering the eyes and frequency of yawning are independent. HA: Covering the eyes and frequency of yawning are not independent. State the conclusion and the interpretation of the x? contingency test. Reject Ho. There is insufficient evidence at the level of significance a = 0.05 that the probability of yawning is contingent on covering the eyes. Reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence at the level of significance a = 0.05 that the probability of yawning is contingent on covering the eyes. Fail to reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence at the level of significance a = 0.05 that the probability of yawning is contingent on covering the eyes. Fail to reject Ho. There is insufficient evidence at the level of significance a = 0.05 that the probability of yawning is contingent on covering the eyes.
Transcribed Image Text:It is well known, and scientifically documented, that yawning is contagious. When we see someone else yawn, or even think about someone yawning, we are very likely to yawn ourselves. (In fact, we predict that you are starting to want to yawn right now.) In a study of yawning contagion, researchers showed participants one of several pictures, including a picture of a man yawning, the same man smiling, a yawning man with his mouth covered, or a yawning man with his eyes obscured (Provine et al. 1989). Participants yawned much more often when shown the yawner than the smiler, but surprisingly an identical number also yawned when shown the picture with the mouth obscured. This suggests that something besides the mouth is an important trigger. What about the eyes? Seventeen of 30 participants yawned when confronted with a picture of a yawning man, while 11 of 30 independent participants yawned when shown a picture of a yawning man with his eyes covered. Is there evidence in these data that covering the yawning man's eyes in an image changes the occurrence of contagious yawns? To answer this question, perform the x contingency test. The null and alternative hypotheses are as follows: Họ: Covering the eyes and frequency of yawning are independent. HA: Covering the eyes and frequency of yawning are not independent. State the conclusion and the interpretation of the x? contingency test. Reject Ho. There is insufficient evidence at the level of significance a = 0.05 that the probability of yawning is contingent on covering the eyes. Reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence at the level of significance a = 0.05 that the probability of yawning is contingent on covering the eyes. Fail to reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence at the level of significance a = 0.05 that the probability of yawning is contingent on covering the eyes. Fail to reject Ho. There is insufficient evidence at the level of significance a = 0.05 that the probability of yawning is contingent on covering the eyes.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 2 images

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS