In January 2018, President Trump imposed tariffs on solar panels and washing machines of 30 to 50%. In March 2018 he imposed tariffs on steel (25%) and aluminum (10%) from most countries, representing an estimated 4.1 percent of U.S. imports. On June 1, 2018, this was extended to the European Union, Canada, and Mexico. The Trump administration also set and escalated tariffs on goods imported from China. As of January 2020, the Trump administration had imposed tariffs on 16.8% of all goods imported into the U.S. What would be the effects of these tariff on the US economy? Who would benefit and who would lose from these tariffs in the U.S.?

In January 2018, President Trump imposed tariffs on solar panels and washing machines of 30 to 50%. In March 2018 he imposed tariffs on steel (25%) and aluminum (10%) from most countries, representing an estimated 4.1 percent of U.S. imports. On June 1, 2018, this was extended to the European Union, Canada, and Mexico. The Trump administration also set and escalated tariffs on goods imported from China. As of January 2020, the Trump administration had imposed tariffs on 16.8% of all goods imported into the U.S. What would be the effects of these tariff on the US economy? Who would benefit and who would lose from these tariffs in the U.S.?

MACROECONOMICS FOR TODAY

10th Edition

ISBN:9781337613057

Author:Tucker

Publisher:Tucker

Chapter18: International Trade And Finance

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 7SQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Domestic producers of microprocessors send a lobbyist to the U.S. government to request that the government impose trade restrictions on imports of microprocessors. The lobbyist claims that the U.S. microprocessor industry is new and cannot currently compete with foreign firms. However, if trade restrictions were temporarily imposed on microprocessors, the domestic microprocessor industry could mature and adjust and would eventually be able to compete in the world market. Which of the following justifications is the lobbyist using to support their argument in favor of the trade restriction on microprocessors? National-security argument Infant-industry argument Unfair-competition argument Jobs argument Using-protection-as-a-bargaining-chip argument
A small country is considering imposing a tariff on imported wine at the rate of $5 per bottle. Economists have estimated the following based on this tariff amount: World price of wine (free trade): $20 per bottle Domestic production (free trade): 500,000 bottles Domestic production (after tariff): 600,000 bottles Domestic consumption (free trade): 750,000 bottles Domestic consumption (after tariff): 650,000 bottles Draw a demand and supply curve for the country’s wine market to show the effects of the tariff. Find the change in consumer surplus, producer surplus, and government revenue resulting from the tariff.
Consider a hypothetical world consisting of only three countries: Hungary, Australia, and Italy. Each country produces grain. Hungary is a small economy compared to Australia and Italy and thus cannot influence foreign prices. On the following graph, the supply and demand schedules of Hungary are shown as Sun and Dun. Foreign supply schedules of grain are perfectly elastic: Australia is a more efficient supplier of grain than Italy because its supply price is $1.00 per bushel (SAus), whereas Italy's supply price is $2.00 per bushel (Sita). PRICE (Dollars) 10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0 Hun S +T S₁ +T S S + 0 3 6 A Scenario Free trade With tariff With customs union m SHu 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 GRAIN (Thousands of bushels) Calculate the quantity of bushels Hungary imports when the three nations engage in free trade. Enter this value in the first row of the following table. Also indicate which country Hungary imports from. ? Imports (Thousands of bushels) Imports…
Suppose that Canada imports pearl necklaces from India. The free market price is $111.00 per necklace. If the tariff on imports in Canada is initially 26%, Canadians pay $ per necklace. One of the accomplishments of the Uruguay Round that took place between 1986 and 1993 was significant across-the-board tariff cuts for industrial countries, as well as many developing countries. Suppose that as a result of the Uruguay Round, Canada reduces its import tariffs to 13%. Assuming the price of pearl necklaces is still $111.00 per necklace, consumers now pay the price of $ Based on the calculations and the scenarios presented, the Uruguay Round most likely hurts consumers hurts consumers in India. per necklace. in Canada and
In an effort to protect its domestic pear production, the Kingdom of Genovia decides to place an import tariff on pears. Which of the following correctly explains the tariff’s effect on domestic demand? Choice 1 of 4:The tariff will raise domestic prices and decrease the quantity demanded.Choice 2 of 4:The tariff will raise domestic prices and cause the demand curve to shift left.Choice 3 of 4:Tariffs do not impact the domestic quantity demanded.Choice 4 of 4:The tariff will lower domestic prices and increase the quantity demanded.
Suppose the nation of Isoland is an importer of textiles and is looking for a way to raise government revenue. The following graph shows the effect of a tariff on textile imports. Supply Pw+T F Demand Pw Os 1 Os2 O.1 Quantity of Textiles Price of Textiles
On his first day in office, President Donald Trump took the United States out of the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP), a proposed free trade deal with 11 other countries in the Asia-Pacific region, representing nearly 40% of global GDP. If the TPP had come into existence, the countries in the TPP would NOT be in violation of the most-favored nation (MFN) principle in the World Trade Organization (WTO) by giving each other preferential trade access. Why? A. There is an exception to MFN regarding the Generalized System of Preferences. Because Vietnam, a developing country, was one of the 12 members of the TPP, that exception applies to the whole partnership. B. Because the United States has the largest economy in the world, it gets to decide when MFN applies and when it doesn’t. C. There is an exception to MFN regarding regional trade agreements (RTA), and because all the proposed members inhabit the Asia-Pacific region, the TPP would have been an RTA, and therefore, members could give…
Which of the following is TRUE about tariffs? Question options: Tariffs cause imported product prices to fall. Tariffs create strong relationships between trading partners. Tariffs increase the price of imported goods, which decreases demand. Tariffs cause demand for imported products to rise.
In early 1998, Luis Tellez, Mexico’s oil minister, held a secret meeting with his Saudi Arabian counterparts. As a government official, he decides how many barrels of oil Mexico would produce and sell to other countries. The purpose of a secret meeting was to increase earnings, or revenues, from selling oil by raising world price of oil, which had fallen 50% over the previous two years. The low oil price was creating serious problems for both governments. A plan to increase oil price will not succeed unless other oil-exporting countries were willing to reduce oil production. Why? Why not just raise prices? To make the plan work, Tellez had to persuade his fellow oil ministers to produce less. But how much less? What information he needs to know in order to answer this question?
In the United States, imposing a tariff on imported vitamin D3 would: Group of answer choices increase total American consumption of vitamin D3. increase American consumption of domestically produced vitamin D3. reduce exports of vitamin D3. decrease domestic production of vitamin D3.
Scenario & Question 7: A country decides to impose higher tariffs on imported goods to encourage domestic production. This policy change impacts the circular flow of income and expenditure by altering the dynamics of international trade. In this scenario, the imposition of tariffs on imports primarily: A) Acts as a leakage in the circular flow B) Functions as an injection into the circular flow C) Has no significant impact on the circular flow D) Reduces government expenditure in the circular flow
The cost of producing cars in Canada is $30,000, while the cost of producing cars in Mexico is $22,000, while in the U.S. it costs $18,000. Canada currently imposes a 50% tariff on all automobile imports. a) If Canada enters into a customs union with Mexico, will this lead to trade diversion or trade creation? b) If the tariff rate was originally 100%, would Canada entering into a customs union with Mexico lead to trade diversion or trade creation? c) If the tariff rate was originally 100%, and the cost of producing cars in the U.S. was $12,000, would Canada entering into a customs union with Mexico lead to trade diversion or trade creation?