In a courtroom in 2005, biologist Ken Miller criticized the claims of intelligent design. After noting that 99.9% of the organisms that have ever lived on earth are now extinct, he said that “an intelligent designer who designed things, 99.9% of which didn’t last, certainly wouldn’t be very intelligent.” Evaluate Miller’s criticism.

In a courtroom in 2005, biologist Ken Miller criticized the claims of intelligent design. After noting that 99.9% of the organisms that have ever lived on earth are now extinct, he said that “an intelligent designer who designed things, 99.9% of which didn’t last, certainly wouldn’t be very intelligent.” Evaluate Miller’s criticism.

Biology 2e

2nd Edition

ISBN:9781947172517

Author:Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi, Mary Ann Clark

Publisher:Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi, Mary Ann Clark

Chapter1: The Study Of Life

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1VCQ: Figure 1.6 In the example below, the scientific method is used to solve an everyday problem. Order...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Intelligent design is the theory that life is too complex to have evolved randomly. The eye is often cited as an example, arguing that its complexity argues for the presence of a creator guiding its development. What use is half an eye or a partial wing? It is a popular idea because it does not deny the observable fact of evolution, while leaving room for the presence of God. Is intelligent design a viable scientific theory? Why or why not?
Choose one of the misconceptions and explain the misconception and how discuss how your understanding on this misconception has developed over time. 1. "Scientific understand is unchanging." 2. “All mutations have an impact on the organism.” 3. “Natural selection involves organisms trying to adapt.” 4. “Adaptations are a result of competition.” 5. “There are more consumers than producers.” 6. "People look more like one parent than the other because they get more DNA from that parent."
Read the following article and answer these questions: 1. a. b. c. d. What is the main point of the article? A:evolution is an important and useful theory B:evolution is a theory that has not been proven C:we should improve crops to feed more people D:we should not tamper with nature 2. Why must farmers be careful about the pesticides they use? a. they could poison the land and harm other organisms b. they crops may die c. insects may become resistant d. so that they can produce better crops 3. Why is it difficult to create a vaccine for AIDS? a. the virus is too well hidden in the body b. the virus is constantly changing c. vaccines only work on bacterial infections d. not enough research money 4. Years ago, doctors would prescribe antibiotics for many symptoms of a common cold. Today, it is much more difficult to get a prescription. Why has the medical industry changed its procedures? a. too many antibiotics can create resistant bacteria b. pharmaceutical companies…
Pesticides can be used to control a variety of pests, such as insects, weeds, rodents, bacteria, fungi, etc. Over time many pesticides have gradually lost their effectiveness because pests have developed resistance – a significant decrease in sensitivity to a pesticide, which reduces the field performance of these pesticides. 1. Why do pesticides lose their effectiveness over time? Use the theory of natural selection and evolution to explain.
When doing science writing, it is okay to use direct quotes, phrases, or strings of words from another source as long as you give credit to that source. O Yes, science writing often includes direct quotes, phrases, or strings of words from other sources. These quotes are always carefully attributed to their source. O No, science writing does not include direct quotes, phrases, even strings of words from other sources. When doing science writing, you are expected to explain things in your own words. In-text citations allow you to use the ideas found in a source, but not its words.
Figure 1.18 In the example below, the scientific method is used to solve an everyday problem. Which part in the example below is the hypothesis? Which is the prediction? Based on the results of the experiment, is the hypothesis supported? If it is not supported, propose some alternative hypotheses.1. My toaster doesn’t toast my bread.2. Why doesn’t my toaster work?3. There is something wrong with the electrical outlet.4. If something is wrong with the outlet, my coffeemaker also won’t work when plugged into it.5. I plug my coffeemaker into the outlet.6. My coffeemaker works.
What are the essential characteristics of science? Describe how evolu-tionary studies fit these characteristics whereas “scientific creation-ism” or “intelligent-design theory” does not.
3)If a scientist does an experiment and gets a result, but no other scientists are able to repeat the experiment and get the same result, what does that mean? Select one: a. The first scientist is a quack b. The other scientists don't know what they're doing c. Something about the hypothesis, prediction, or experimental design is wrong in the first experiment d. The first scientist's hypothesis is wrong e. There's no way to do the investigation
Which statement below best describes the main difference between how scientists define data and hypotheses? Scientific hypotheses are testable observations whereas scientific data are verifiable or repeatable explanations of how nature works. Scientific hypotheses are repeatable or verifiable observations whereas scientific data are testable explanations of how nature works. Scientific data are certain whereas scientific hypotheses are uncertain and haven't been adequately tested. Scientific data are repeatable or verifiable observations whereas scientific hypotheses are testable explanations of how nature works. Scientific data are repeatable or verifiable explanations whereas scientific hypotheses are testable observations of how nature works.
If we lived in a world without mutation, then we will not have evolution. 1)True 2)False
Evolution is defined, in modern terms, as: Group of answer choices just a theory, which means it's not provable adaptation (learning to be a different way) just an hypothesis, which means we can prove it any measurable change in the overall genome (gene map) of a species
Why is evolution considered to be a scientific theory ? A) it’s ideas are supported by facts and inference B) it is not true C) it is not accepted by the scientific community D) it cannot be tested