In 2006, Country X and Country Y had the same production possibilities, illustrated in the figure above. Country X chose to produce at point A, while country Y chose to produce at point B. In 2012, most likely, Country X will be at a point such as, while Country Y will be at a point such as

In 2006, Country X and Country Y had the same production possibilities, illustrated in the figure above. Country X chose to produce at point A, while country Y chose to produce at point B. In 2012, most likely, Country X will be at a point such as, while Country Y will be at a point such as

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

A worker in the United States and a worker in China can each produce 1,000 pairs of jeans per week. A worker in the United States can produce 50 cell phones in a week, and a worker in China can produce 100 cell phones in a week. Answer the following questions based on this information. Calculate the opportunity cost of producing jeans for each country.
Assume that Trinbago is a small country that produces wine and motor vehicles, where motorvehicles are capital intensive. Trinbago is also capital intensive, and the standard Heckscher -Ohlin(H-O) assumptions hold. The other country in the model is Vincyland.Could you assist with 2 graphs illustrating 1. The Hecksher Ohlin model based on the above this should show what the theory of comparative advantage stipulates 2. What trade pattern would occur if the Leontief Paradox holds how will this look graphically.
The table from the image provided shows the ability of two countries to produce TVs and chairs in a given time period. What can be concluded from the information? (Pick either a,b,c, or d) a) Country X has an absolute advantage in TVs and country Y has an absolute advantage in chairs b) Country X has a comparative advantage in TVs and country Y has an absolute advantage in chairs c) Country X has a comparative advantage in chairs and country Y has an absolute advantage in TVs d) Country X has an absolute advantage in TVs and country Y has a comparative advantage in chairs
I've already read the answer provided on this site, but it is not giving me the information I need. I understand the math for finding the opportunity costs for each item in each country. However, where are they getting the answer that 2.5 tons of chemicals is what the US will give up, and 1 ton of apparel is what China will give up? From videos I've seen on youtube, they basically state that as long as the cost is less than what the original opportunity cost is, then nations will trade. So, it costs China 4 apparel for every 1 ton of chemicals, and in the US it costs 1 apparel for every 3 tons of chemicals. Am I right to assume that as long as China can trade less than 4 apparel it will benefit, and as long as the US can trade less than 3 tons of chemicals it will benefit? If so, then what is the math being used to arrive at exactly 1 ton of Chemicals for 1 ton of Apparel for China, and 1 apparel for 2.5 tons of Chemicals for the US? I need to understand the math that is used to…
Please explain the roles of Production Possibility Curve in any economic system applied by any countries? And Do you agree that the economic growth shifts the PPC outward and makes it possible to have more of all commodities. It means economy ofa country in growing up faster? If Yes or Not, please provide your reasons as widely as possible? PLEASE GIVE DETAIL EXPLANATION
Suppose that there are two countries; Country 1 and Country 2. Country 1 is capital abundant and country 2 is labor abundant. X is capital intensive and Y is labor intensive. Assume that Country 1 is a large country and country 2 is a small country. Answer the following question: What happens to the terms of trade of Country 1, terms of trade of Country 2, welfare of country 1 and country 2 when Country 1’s capital stock increases?
i need Solution of 8, 9, 10 parts
There are two countries, Atlantis and Thule, and two goods, Clothing (C) and food (F) In Atlantis, it takes 3 units of labour to produce a unit of Clothing and 3 units of labour to make a unit of Food. In Thule, a unit of Clothing requires 2 units of labour, and a unit of Food requires 5 units of labour. Assume that Atlantis has 300 units of labour, and Thule has 500 units of labour. (a) What is the opportunity cost of Food in terms of Clothing in each country? (b) Which country has an absolute advantage in which good? (c) Which country has a comparative advantage in which good? Why? (d) Draw the production possibilities frontier for each country (put Food on the horizontal axis). Label axes and slopes. (e) Draw the world production possibilities frontier (assuming labour does not move between countries). Again, put Food on the horizontal axis. Label axes and important points on - 2 - the diagram. (f ) Draw the world relative supply curve (labelled RS) for F/C with the relative price…
Draw two Linear Production Possibilities Curves for two countries: Portugal and England and two products :Wine (kegs) and Cloth (Sheets). On Portugal's graph show the maximum production per worker of cloth sheets of 100 units on the Y axis. On the X axis show the maximum production of Wine at 150 kegs. For England's graph show the outputs at 90 cloth sheets on the Y axis and 60 Wine kegs on the X axis
Explain how each of the following situations would affect a nations production possibility curve. A technological innovation allows the nation to more efficiently convert solar energy to electricity.
Below are hypothetical production possibilities tables for New Zealand and Spain. Each country can produce apples and plums. Referring to the tables, answer the following: Suppose the optimal product mixes before specialization and trade are alternative B in New Zealand and alternative S in Spain and the actual terms of trade are 1 plum for 2 apples. What will be the gains from specialization and trade?
Suppose that a worker in Country A can produce either 6 units of corn or 2 units of wheat per year, and a worker in Country B can produce either 2 units of corn or 6 units of wheat per year. Each nation has 10 workers. Without trade, Country A produces and consumes 30 units of corn and 10 units of wheat per year. Country B produces and consumes 10 units of corn and 30 units of wheat. Suppose that trade is then initiated between the two countries, and Country A sends 30 units of corn to Country B in exchange for 30 units of wheat. Country A will now be able to consume a maximum of Select one: a.30 units of corn and 30 units of wheat. b.40 units of corn and 20 units of wheat. c.40 units of corn and 30 units of wheat. d.10 units of corn and 40 units of wheat.