ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN: 9780190931919
Author: NEWNAN
Publisher: Oxford University Press
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
If the MPC in an economy is 0.80, government could shift the aggregate demand curve leftward by $48 billion by
Multiple Choice
*increasing taxes by $12 billion
*Reducing government expenditures by $4 billion
*Increasing taxes by $9.6 billion
*reducing government expenditures by $48 billion.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Step by stepSolved in 2 steps
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Suppose actual real GDP is $7.87 trillion, potential real GDP is $14.36 trillion, and the marginal propensity to consume is 0.61. If we ignore price effects, by how many trillions of dollars should the government change its lump sum taxes to fix the gap? (Round this to two digits after the decimal and enter this value as either a positive value or a negative value without the dollar sign.)arrow_forwardSuppose actual real GDP is $9.06 trillion, potential real GDP is $6.42 trillion, and the marginal propensity to consume is 0.59. If we ignore price effects, by how many trillions of dollars should the government change its lump sum taxes to fix the gap? (Round this to two digits after the decimal and enter this value as either a positive value or a negative value without the dollar sign.)arrow_forwardInstructions: Round your responses to two decimal places. If taxes were cut by $1 trillion and the MPC was 0.88, by how much would total spending trillion a. increase in the first year with two spending cycles per year?arrow_forward
- Assume that the Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) is 0.8. If the multiplier effect is taken into account, the reduction in government expenditure by $ 200 million will shift the overall demand process to the correct order below. A) right, $1,000 million B) left, $ 200 million C) left, $160 million D) left, $1,000 million E) right, $ 160 millionarrow_forwardIf the MPC in an economy is 0.7, the government could shift the aggregate demand curve rightward by $30 billion by changing government purchases by $billion. Your Answer: Answerarrow_forwardIf the marginal propensity to consume is 0.50, how much would government spending have to rise to increase output by $1,000 billion? AG = $500 billion. (Enter your response as an integer.) How much will taxes need to decrease to increase output by $1,000 billion? AT $ billion. (Enter your response as an integer.)arrow_forward
- Assume that in the economy of Utrea, the MPC is 0.8 and the multiplier is 3 and that both government spending and autonomous taxes are increased by $40. In what direction and by how much will equilibrium GDP change?arrow_forwardGiven that the maginal propensity to consume (MPC) is 0.50, what is the change in equilibrium output (or aggregate demand), if there is a tax is reduced by 50? Hint: Use the tax multiplier formula. -50 -25 50 25arrow_forwardnet taxes were lowered from $5000 to $1000, the MPC is .75, and autonomous consumption spending is $10,000, by how much would consumption increase?arrow_forward
- If the MPC in an economy is .8, government could shift the aggregate demand curve rightward by $100 billion by: increasing government spending by $25 billion. increasing government spending by $80 billion. decreasing taxes by $25 billion. decreasing taxes by $100 billion.arrow_forwardSuppose actual real GDP is $5.49 trillion, potential real GDP is $12.48 trillion, and the marginal propensity to consume is 0.76. If we ignore price effects, and if the government already decided to increase its spending by $1.07 trillion, by how many trillions of dollars should the government change its lump sum taxes to fix the gap? (Round this to two digits after the decimal and enter this value as either a positive value or a negative value without the dollar sign.)arrow_forwardno handwritten notes!arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education