
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN: 9780190931919
Author: NEWNAN
Publisher: Oxford University Press
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Horizon value question
A project involved initial construction costs of $1.75 million. After 15 years, the useful life of that construction will be over and the facility will be demolished, involving sensitive environmental protections and cleanup. You estimate that 25% of the cost of the facility represents items that could be sold for scrap at 30% of their initial construction cost. You estimate the proper demolition cost of such a facility to be $0.9M.
a. What is the NPV of the horizon value if the real discount rate is 0.035?
b. If the expected annual rate of inflation is 0.02, what is the nominal horizon value in 15 years?
Expert Solution

This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Step by stepSolved in 3 steps with 3 images

Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- The California Forest Service is considering two locations for a new state park. Location Ewould require an investment of $3 million and $50,000 per year in maintenance. Location Wwould cost $7 million to construct, but the Forest Service would receive an additional $25,000per year in park use fees. The operating cost of location W will be $65,000 per year. The revenueto park concessionaires will be $500,000 per year at location E and $700,000 per year at locationW. The disbenefits associated with each location are $30,000 per year for location E and $40,000per year for location W. Use(a) The B/C method, and(b) The modified B/C method to determine which location, if either, should be selected, using aninterest rate of 12% per year. Assume that the park will be maintained indefinitely.arrow_forward1) Calculate the payback period, the discounted payback period and the NPV for the following project using a rate of 5%. Time Cash Flow 0 - $63,000 1 - $ 21,000 2 - $ 21,000 3 - $ 21,000 4 - $ 21,000 Payback = Discounted Payback =arrow_forward7) A machine costing $25,000 to buy and $3,000 per year to operate will save mainly labor expenses in packaging over six years. The anticipated salvage value at the end of six years is $5,000. What is the minimum savings in labor the machine should provide at a MARR of 10%? SHOW YOUR WORK FOR CREDIT A) $7,015 B) $8,119 C) $8,092 D) $6,025arrow_forward
- Epsilon Corp. is evaluating an expansion of its business. The cash-flow forecasts for the project are as follows: Years 0 1-8 Cash Flow ($ millions) -120 17 The firm's existing assets have a beta of 1.6. The risk-free interest rate is 6% and the expected return on the market portfolio is 14%. What is the project's NPV? (Enter your answer in millions. A negative answer should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to 2 decimal places.) NPV ................ millionarrow_forward2. A municipality is considering an investment in a small renewable energy power plant with the following parameters. The cost is $400,000 and the output averages 50 kW year- round. The price paid for electricity at the plant gate is $0.037/kWh. The investment is to be evaluated over a 25-year time horizon, and the expected salvage value at the end of the project is $22,000. The MARR is 7%. [Total: 9 marks] a. Calculate the net present value (NPV) of this investment. Is it financially attractive? b. Calculate the operating credit per kWh which the government would need to give to the investment in order to make it break even financially. Express your answer to the nearest 1/1000th of dollars.arrow_forwardProject A requires an immediate investment of $8000 and another $6000 in three years. Net returns are $4000 after two years, $12,000 after four years, and $8000 after six years. Project B requires an immediate investment of $4000, another $6000 after two years, and $4000 after four years. Net returns are $3400 per year for seven years. Determine the net present value at 10%. Which project is preferable according to the net present value criterion?arrow_forward
- # 3 QUESTION 10 Suppose the MARR is 5%. Use the following table to answer the question-Which option should be selected as the base alternative? Initial Investment Annual Revenue Useful Life (Years) E D $ 4 R CMS A. Neither option is acceptable as a base alternative. OB. Both options are acceptable base alternatives. OC. FMS OD. I'm completely lost! E. CMS F Click Save and Submit to save and submit. Click Save All Answers to save all answers. 888 74 $31,000 $38,000 6,866 % FMS 5 T 9,201 G 6 MacBook FO H & 7 F7 U +00 8 J 9 K Save All Answers P 7.arrow_forwardPermian Partners (PP) produces from aging oll fields in west Texas. Production is 1.86 million barrels per year in 2018, but production is declining at 8% per year for the foreseeable future. Costs of production, transportation, and administration add up to $25.60 per barrel. The average ol price was $65.60 per barrel in 2018. PP has 76 million shares outstanding. The cost of capital is 10%. All of PP's net income is distributed as dividends. For simplicity. assume that the company will stay in business forever and that costs per barrel are constant at $25.60. Also, ignore taxes. a. Assume that oll prices are expected to fall to $60.60 per barrel in 2019, $55.60 per barrel in 2020, and $50.60 per barrel in 2021. After 2021, assume a long-term trend of oll-price increases at 6% per year. What is the ending 2018 value of one PP share? (Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to 2 decimal places.) Share value 2016 b-1. What is PP's EPS/P ratio? (Do not round intermediate…arrow_forwardQuestion 3.4 (15pts) Consider the following two mutually exclusive projects: a What assumption(s) do you need in order to compare a set of mutually exclusive service projects with unequal service lives? b With the assumption(s) defined in part (a) and using 10%, determine which project should be selected. c If your analysis period (study period) is just 4 years, what would be the salvage value of project 42 at the end of year 4 to make the two alternatives economically indifferent? Question 3.4 (15pts) Consider the following two mutually exclusive projects: Year A1 0 -$1,800 A2 -$3,600 1 -$500 -$ 600 2 -$500 - $600 3 -$500 - $600 4 -$500 - $600 5 $ 500+400 - $600 6 - $600 - $600 $600+1000 7 8 a What assumption(s) do you need in order to compare a set of mutually exclusive service projects with unequal service lives? b With the assumption(s) defined in part (a) and using 10 %, determine which project should be selected. c If your analysis period (study period) is just 4 years, what…arrow_forward
- Payback Period and Net Present Value If a project with conventional cash flows has a payback period less than the project’s life, can you definitively state the algebraic sign of the NPV? Why or why not? If you know that the discounted payback period is less than the project’s life, what can you say about the NPV? Explain. Qarrow_forwardQuestion(4): A power plant is being considered in the dead sea location. For an initial investment of $130 million, annual net revenues are estimated to be $15 million in years 1-5 and $20 million in years 6-20. Assume no residual market value for the plant. a. What is the simple payback period for the plant?arrow_forwardConsider a palletizer at a bottling plant that has a first cost of $150,000, operating and maintenance costs of $17,500 per year, and an estimated net salvage value of $25,000 at the end of 30 years. Assume an interest rate of 8%. What is the present equivalent cost of the investment if the planning horizon is 30 years? a. $335,000. b. $344,500. c. $360,000. d. $395,500.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education


Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON

Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON

Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning

Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education