Exercise 3: merger example
Algoma Steel Inc. and Stelco Steel Inc. Merger?
Suppose you work at the Bureau and your task is to assess a proposed merger between Algoma Steel Inc. and Stelco Steel Inc. For simplicity, these are the only two firms in Canada. The cost of this merger is that the two firms will become one joint firm, or the duopolists become the monopolist. This is likely to limit consumer choices and the
Demand for steel: P = 1,800 - Q
Marginal revenue: MR = 1,800 - 2Q
Supply of steel: MC =
Case #1: Before Merger - Cournot duopoly - the government does not intervene
The total surplus (TS), defined as the sum of
Case #2: Reject the merger
If Algoma Inc. and Stelco Inc. were to merge, they can cut marginal cost. They can cut costs because they can share technology know-how, purchase iron ore in bulk to bargain for discounts, etc. You estimate that the MC = ATC per ton will fall from $600 to $500. The firms will benefit from this merger because their joint profit rises by _______. The TS is equal to ___________. You should reject this proposed merger.
Case #3: Approve the merger
Suppose the firms send you more cost information and you revise the MC = ATC per ton from $500 to $400. The TS is equal to ________ and you decide to approve the merger.
Case #4: Approve merger because MC = ATC = $400 but regulate price to keep constant CS
Suppose you keep CS constant at the level you have found under Case #1, before the merger. The new TS is equal to _________.
Case #5: Approve merger because MC = ATC = $400 but regulate price to keep almost constant PS
Because the newly merged firm has more market power, you want to regulate this new monopolist. Suppose you want the new PS to be approximately equal to the PS under Case #1, before the merger. You solve for this quantity and for convenience, you truncate the quantity into an integer. Truncation means that if Q = 100.2 or Q = 100.8, you set Q = 100. The new TS is equal to _________.
a.$625,448
b.$1,022,755
c.$396,888
Step by stepSolved in 4 steps
- 10. Electronic Arts (EA) has decided to introduce a revolutionary video game. As the first firm in the market, it will have a monopoly position for at least some time. In deciding what type of manufacturing plant to build, it has the choice of two technologies. Technology A is publicly available and will result in annual costs of CA(q) 10 + 8q. Technology B is a proprietary technology developed in EA's research labs. It involves a higher fixed cost of production but lower marginal costs C'B (q) = 60 + 2q. EA must decide which technology to adopt. Market demand for the new product is p = 20 – Q, where Q is the total industry output. a) Suppose EA were certain that it would maintain its monopoly position in the market for the entire product lifespan (about five years) without threat of entry. Which technology would you advise EA to adopt? What would be EA's profit given this choice? b) Suppose EA expects its rival, Ubisoft, to consider entering the market shortly after EA introduces its…arrow_forwardHi I need help with the worksheet below.arrow_forwardExplain why the cost structure associated with many kinds of information goods and services might imply a market supplied by a small number of large firms. (At the same time, some Internet businesses such as grocery home deliveries have continually suffered steep losses regardless of scale. Explain why.) Could lower transaction costs in e-commerce ever make it easier for small suppliers to compete? As noted in the previous chapters, network externalities are often an important aspect of demand for information goods and services. (The benefits to customers of using software, participating in electronic markets, or using instant messaging increase with the number of other users.) How might network externalities affect firm operating strategies (pricing, output, and advertising) and firm size?arrow_forward
- Space 1 options: less than or equal to, equal to, greater than or equal to Space 2 options: 0 0.5 1 8 16arrow_forward6)Game Theory: The Prisoners’ Dilemma: Assume that the Wilson and Spalding athletic equipment companies are in a one-shot game for market share and profits, but that they have the option of choosing only one of two possible price strategies for basketballs: $20 or $80. Obviously if they choose different strategies, the firm with the lower price will win the entire market. The firms face the following payoff matrix (See Chap. 10). Wilson\ \Spalding Wilson $ 20 Price Wilson $ 80 Price Spalding $ 20 Price $ 400, $ 400 $ 1500, $ 0 Spalding $ 80 Price $ 0, $ 1500 $ 1000, $ 1000 What strategy will each firm choose? Why? Which strategy is dominant? Which strategy is preferred by each firm? What will be the outcome of the one-shot game? Where is the Nash equilibrium? Which outcome would be best for the two firms? What will happen if the game is repeated an infinite number of times?arrow_forwardQuestion 2 (Choices Involving Strategy): Suppose there are two competing Gyms in a local town. Each gym is individually owned and has three pricing levels to choose from: Low, Medium and High (PL,PM, and PH). Consider the table below as the outcomes for each combination of strategies (they are yearly profits in the thousands). Can you predict the outcome using ONLY iteratively dominated strategies? Why or why not? Find the Nash Equilibrium(a) using best responses. Is this the best outcome? Now, suppose that there was a sudden increase in the cost of equipment that meant the low price was no longer viable, and both choosing the medium price level meant only 50 (thousand) profit for each gym. Nothing else changes. What is the pure and mixed strategy Nash equilibrium of this new game? Gym 1 is on the left and Gym 2 is on the top. The first number inside every box is Gym 1's profit and the second (after the comma) is Gym 2's profit. (10 Marks) PL PMPH PL 125, 125 200, 75 375,50 PM 75, 250…arrow_forward
- 2Aarrow_forwardMonopoly: End of Chapter Problem 5. Firms use price discrimination to increase their profits by converting part or all of consumer surplus to producer surplus. Which of the following market conditions is not necessary for a firm to engage in price discrimination? O A firm must have the ability to prevent arbitrage. A firm must have the ability to separate consumers intoigroups based on their elasticities of demand. O A firm must have the ability to hide their prices from consumers. A firm must have some market power. Publisher: Worth Publishers 7:41 PM Question Source: Chiang 4e - Economics Principles For A Changing World 39°F A O 1 a I E 4) 23 12/12/2021 aarrow_forwardConsider a game where a potential market Entrant is trying to decide whether or not to enter the market. An Incumbent monopolist is established and can choose to cut the price, maintain the price, or raise the price in hopes of deterring the Entrant from entering. Incumbent Entrant Enter Stay Out Cut Price -4,4 0,9 Maintain Price 4,6 0,12 Raise Price 5,5 0, 13 a) Suppose the Entrant and the Incumbent make their decisions simultaneously. Is there a pure strategy Nash equilibrium? If so, what is it? b) Suppose the players move sequentially, and that the Entrant moves first. Set up the game tree and solve for the equilibrium path. Can the Incumbent deter entry? Explain. c) Now suppose that the Incumbent moves first. Again, set up the game tree. What is the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium outcome now? Can the Incumbent deter entry now?arrow_forward
- Econ301 Entrant Practice Sheet- Games Question 1: The following is the game of fighting entry. A new firm, referred to as the entrant, has to decide whether to enter the market or not. An established firm, referred to as firm 1, has then to decide given the actions of the new firm whether to lower the price (and hence fight the entrant) or keep its price high. The payoffs to each are shown below Enter Do not Enter High price 60, 60 0, 100 Prot Ahmed Firm 1 Low price 0,0 0,0 a. Represent the game in extensive form. b. Find the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium c. What can you say about the potential for firm 1 to fight the entrant? Firm 1 threatens to lower price if the entrant enters. What do you think of this threat?arrow_forwardQ16 Suppose we are referring to OPEC, the oil cartel. Which would make it easier to maintain an effective collusive agreement among OPEC members? Multiple Choice the emergence of a number of potential entrant firms a decrease in the elasticity of demand for the OPEC's oil a new method of pricing that makes it more difficult for cartel members to determine the prices at which other cartel members are selling oil an increase in the number of substitutes for the oil produced by the OPEC cartel a pledge of allegiance to the cartelarrow_forwardN: $30 V: $130 High price New firm N: $50 V: $100 Low price Advertise Verizon N: $60 V: $140 Do not advertise Expand High price New New firm firm Low price N: $70 V: $90 Do not N: $30 V: $170 The figure shown displays the choices that could be made by Verizon and a new firm in the industry. The payoffs are the profits (in millions) these companies will earn as a result of their choices. What will be the outcome of this game? Multiple Choice The new firm will expand; Verizon will advertise; the new firm will choose high prices. The new firm will expand; Verizon will advertise; the new firm will choose low prices. The new firm will expand; Verizon will not advertise; the new firm will choose high prices. The new firm will not expand. еxpandarrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education