During the summer you have made the decision to attend summer school, which prevents you from working at your usual summer job in which you normally earn $6,000 for the summer. Your tuition cost is $3,000 and books and supplies cost $1,300. In terms of dollars, what is the opportunity cost of attending summer school? Show your calculation.

The United States and Canada have the production possibilities curves shown above.  It is determined that the United States has the comparative advantage in peanuts. Will both nations gain from trade if the terms of trade that are offered are 1 Peanut= 3 Corn? Why or why not? Show your work.

Economic theory suggests that we can increase productivity by:     Specializing according to absolute advantage.   Specializing according to comparative advantage.   Specializing according to either absolute or comparative advantage.   It is impossible to increase productivity

Homework (Ch 02) 4. Shifts in production possibilities Suppose Ireland produces two types of goods: agricultural and capital. The following diagram shows its current production possibilities frontier for corn, an agricultural good, and airplanes, a capital good. Drag the production possibilities frontier (PPF) on the graph to show the effects of an immigration law that results in fewer workers entering the country. Note: Select either end of the curve on the graph to make the endpoints appear. Then drag one or both endpoints to the desired position. Points will snap into position, so if you try to move a point and it snaps back to its original position, just drag it a little farther. (? 540 450 PPF 360 270 180 90 PPF 300 400 500 600 100 200 CORN (Millions of bushels) AIRPLANES (Thousands)

Explain the difference between absolute advantage and comparative advantage. Which is more important in determining trade patterns, absolute advantage or comparative advantage? Why?

I've already read the answer provided on this site, but it is not giving me the information I need. I understand the math for finding the opportunity costs for each item in each country. However, where are they getting the answer that 2.5 tons of chemicals is what the US will give up, and 1 ton of apparel is what China will give up? From videos I've seen on youtube, they basically state that as long as the cost is less than what the original opportunity cost is, then nations will trade. So, it costs China 4 apparel for every 1 ton of chemicals, and in the US it costs 1 apparel for every 3 tons of chemicals. Am I right to assume that as long as China can trade less than 4 apparel it will benefit, and as long as the US can trade less than 3 tons of chemicals it will benefit? If so, then what is the math being used to arrive at exactly 1 ton of Chemicals for 1 ton of Apparel for China, and 1 apparel for 2.5 tons of Chemicals for the US? I need to understand the math that is used to…

Consider a simple exchange economy with two people: Bob and Jake. Bob and Jake both have 10 hours of time available. They can use their time to do one of 2 things: make pancakes or make hamburgers. Bob can make 2 hamburgers in an hour or 1 pancake in an hour. Jake can make 3 pancakes in an hour and 2 hamburgers in an hour. Use this information to answer the following question:  Who has absolute advantage in the production of hamburgers and who has absolute advantage in the production of pancakes?

On the following graph, use the blue line (circle symbol) to plot Nick's production possibilities frontier (PPF), and use the purple line (diamond symbol) to plot Rosa's PPF.     Nick and Rosa are farmers. Each one owns a 12-acre plot of land. The following table shows the amount of corn and rye each farmer can produce per year on a given acre. Each farmer chooses whether to devote all acres to producing corn or rye or to produce corn on some of the land and rye on the rest.   Corn Rye     Nick 12 3 Rosa 15 5     (ROSA OR NICK)  has an absolute advantage in the production of corn, and  (ROSA OR NICK)  has an absolute advantage in the production of rye.   Nick's opportunity cost of producing 1 bushel of rye is__________bushels of corn, whereas Rosa's opportunity cost of producing 1 bushel of rye is_________ bushels of corn. Because Nick has a(HIGHER OR LOWER)    opportunity cost of producing rye than Rosa, (NICK OR ROSA)   has a comparative advantage in the…

Why is it important that the country or region with the lower opportunity cost produce the good? How would you use the concept of comparative advantage to argue for reducing restrictions on trade between countries?

Discuss the opportunity cost you incur for some activity in your life. Additionally, what activity do you feel you have comparative advantage in?