Do you agree or disagree with the discussion below? What is your reaction? Any additional thought? Goodward is correct because when cranberry growers pool their crops and determine the selling price, it can limit competition and restrict trade. This type of agreement can be seen as anti-competitive and violates antitrust laws that promote fair competition. When cranberry growers join together and set the price for their crops, it can limit fair competition and go against the laws that promote fair business practices. It goes against the law because such an agreement among cranberry growers can restrict competition and create a monopoly-like situation, which is considered unfair and anti-competitive. Antitrust laws promote fair competition and prevent practices that harm consumers or limit market competition.

Do you agree or disagree with the discussion below? What is your reaction? Any additional thought? Goodward is correct because when cranberry growers pool their crops and determine the selling price, it can limit competition and restrict trade. This type of agreement can be seen as anti-competitive and violates antitrust laws that promote fair competition. When cranberry growers join together and set the price for their crops, it can limit fair competition and go against the laws that promote fair business practices. It goes against the law because such an agreement among cranberry growers can restrict competition and create a monopoly-like situation, which is considered unfair and anti-competitive. Antitrust laws promote fair competition and prevent practices that harm consumers or limit market competition.