Consider two firms in the Australia market. The table below depicts each firm’s profits, depending on what price both firms charge.   a. Find (if any) each firm's dominant strategy. b. Which strategy does each firm choose in equilibrium when collusion (joint agreement) is not allowed? c. Suppose that collusion is allowed between the two firms. Could these firms benefit from collusion? Why or why not?

Suppose three Cournot competitors, each with costs Ci = 30qi, face an inverse market demand curve of P = 480 – 4Q. Suppose merging will not change costs. a. Find profits for the three firms. Note:  Don’t round your answers.  How will the profits change for F1 and for F2|3 if F2 and F3 merge? b. Suppose that after the merger occurs, F1 and the new firm F2|3 successfully collude at setting the monopoly price and output, and splitting the resulting monopoly profits. How, if at all, does this change the impact of the merger on F1 and on the merged firm?

The diagram illustrate an industry under oligopoly consisting of 10 equal-sized firms, and a particular firm in that industry. Each of the firms produces an identical product. To what output will an individual firm be restricted if the price is to be maintained?Assume that all firms are permitted to produce the same level of output.  If the other firms stick to this output, how much would an individual firm be tempted to produce if it wished to maximize its own profit at the agreed price?  If it undercut the cartel price, what and output would maximize its profit (assuming the other members did not retaliate)?

What is the prisoner's dilemma, and what does it have to do with oligopoly?

Alpha's Price Policy C B D High A Low A Beta's Price Policy High $20 $20 C B $30 Low $30 $10 D $10 Based on the profit matrix above, what is the outcome of the game if Alpha and Beta collude? $15 $15

See image for questions parts

What would be the correct answer in this case?  I was surprised that "B. The Nash equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a high output and for Kuwait to produce a high output"  was incorrect.

Please help me this is the completed question

Consider a standard Cournot oligopoly with n ≥ 2 identical firms, P(x) = a - bX, X ≥ 0, and C(x) = cx2. a. Find the Cournot equilibrium output and profit. b. If m firms wish to merge, what would be their cost function, assuming that they can use all their m production plants but that they otherwise do not have any eciency gains as a result of the merger? c. Given the cost function from part b, when is an m-firm merger profitable to the merged entity? To the non merging firms? d. Give a precise economic intuition explaining your answer relative to the usual (linear cost) case.  

Consider a market with two firms, Coke and Pepsi, that produce soft drinks. Both firms must choose whether to charge a high price ($1.25) or a low price ($0.65) for their soft drinks. These price strategies with corresponding profits are depicted in the payoff matrix to the right. Coke's profits are in red and Pepsi's are in blue. Coke's dominant strategy is to pick a price of dominant strategy is to pick a price of $ What is the Nash equilibrium for this game? A. Coke and Pepsi will both choose a price of $1.25. B. Coke will choose a price of $1.25 and Pepsi will choose a price of $0.65. and Pepsi's O C. Coke will choose a price of $0.65 and Pepsi will choose a price of $1.25. D. Coke and Pepsi will both choose a price of $0.65. Price = $1.25 Pepsi Price = $0.65 Price = $1.25 Price = $0.65 $800 Coke $900 $800 $175 $175 $700 $900 $700