Consider the following modified Cournot-game. Firm 2 is run by its owner whereas Firm 1 is run by a manager whose preferences are represented by the following payoff function u(91, 92) = II₁ (91, 92) + aq₁ and the marked demand function is P = 1 - Q. The game is played as follows. In the first stage the owner of the Firm 1 chooses 0 < a < 1. Then the manager of Firm 1 and the owner of Firm 2 observes a and choose q₁ and q2 to maximize u and II₂ respectively. What are the subgame-perfect equilibrium levels of a, q₁ and 92?

Consider the following modified Cournot-game. Firm 2 is run by its owner whereas Firm 1 is run by a manager whose preferences are represented by the following payoff function u(91, 92) = II₁ (91, 92) + aq₁ and the marked demand function is P = 1 - Q. The game is played as follows. In the first stage the owner of the Firm 1 chooses 0 < a < 1. Then the manager of Firm 1 and the owner of Firm 2 observes a and choose q₁ and q2 to maximize u and II₂ respectively. What are the subgame-perfect equilibrium levels of a, q₁ and 92?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Firm 1 and Firm 2 are Stackelberg competitors. Firm 1 is the leader and Firm 2 is the follower. They have the same cost functions: Firm 1: C₁(Q1) = 4Q1 Firm 2: C2(Q2) = 4Q2 The market demand is QD = 42 -0.5P Compute the SPE of this game. In equilibrium, Firm 1 produces Q₁= and the price is P= v, Firm 2 produces Q2=
The total cost for a product-testing firm is C(q)=70 + 20q2 q= number of products tested Price of a product = average cost Each corporation purchases one product test per year from a product-testing firm in the same city. All other inputs are ubiquitous. Suppose five corporations are initially distributed uniformly, with one corporation in each city (A,B,C,D,E). Is the initial distribution a Nash Equilibrium? Demonstrate it is not by finding how much one corporation would pay if they deviate and move to another city? What is the average price of having two tests conducted? (Which is the price that the corporation would pay if they "live" in a city where two tests are conducted) The average price of moving and thus, having two tests is: $_____
Two firms, Snow Kings and Ski Express, at Denver International Airport have franchises to carry passengers to and from the mountains. These two firms compete through advertising. Their payoff matrix is below. Profits per customer are represented in the following format (Snow Kings, Ski Express Snow Kings Advertise Don't Advertise Advertise 25, 15 15, 20 Ski Express Don't Advertise 30,0 40,5 What combination of strategies achieves the Nash equilibrium in this game? a) 25,25 (Advertise, Advertise) b) 15,20 (Advertise, Advertise) c) 25,0 (Advertise, Don't Advertise) d) 40,5 (Advertise, Don't Advertise)
O Cell A O Cell C O Cell E O Cell I None of the above
Consider a duopoly market, where two firms sell differentiated products, which are imperfect substitutes. The market can be modelled as a static price competition game, similar to a linear city model. The two firms choose prices p, and p2 simultaneously. The derived demand functions for the two firms are: D1 (P1, P2) = SG+P1)and D2 (P1, P2)= S(;+-P2), where S > 0 and the parameter t > 0 measures the 2t 2t degree of product differentiation. Both firms have constant marginal cost c> 0 for production. (a) Derive the Nash equilibrium of this game, including the prices, outputs and profit of the two firms. (b) From the demand functions, qi= D¡ (p; , p¡ )= SG+P), derive the residual inverse demand functions: p; = P; (qi , p¡) (work out: P; (qi , P;)). Show that for t > 0, P;(qi , P;) is downward 2t aPi (qi ,Pj) . sloping, i.e., c, i.e., firm į has market power. %3D (c) Calculate the limits of the equilibrium prices and profit as t → 0 ? What is P; (qi , p;) as t → 0? Is it downward sloping?…
Two rival companies competing in the same market need to decide their plans for future expansion of their stores. The Table below shows the possible outcomes of their mutually interdependent actions (payoffs are profits in £m) Giga Company Titanic Conglomerate No Change Refurbishment of existing stores Large Expansion No Change 30, 40 25, 35 15, 24 Refurbishment of existing stores 35, 30 28, 32 18, 33 Large Expansion 12, 22 18, 20 20, 25 The Nash equilibrium: (A) does not exist. (B) occurs when both firms choose Refurbishment of existing stores. (C) occurs when both firms choose Large Expansion. (D) occurs when both firms choose No Change.
Two firms, X and Y, are planning to market their new products. Each firm can develop TV, Laptop. Market research indicates that the resulting profits to each firm for the alternative strategies are given by the following payoff matrix : MATRIX IS ATTACHED Find the Nash equilibria for this game, assuming that both firms make their decisions at the same time. (explain the decision step by step) If each firm is risk averse and uses a maximin strategy, what will be the resulting equilibrium? (explain the decision step by step) What will be the equilibrium if Firm X makes its selection first? If Firm Y goes first?
Olivia is thinking about opening a new bakery (the entrant). There is already a bakery open in her neighborhood (the incumbent), and the owner of the incumbent bakery makes it clear that if Olivia enters the market, they will cut their prices in an attempt to drive the new bakery out of business. Based on the payoff matrix below, is the incumbent’s threat credible? That is, if Olivia opens a new bakery, will the incumbent actually lower their prices? Note: the entrant chooses the row, the incumbent chooses the column High price Low price Enter 1, 2 -1, 1 Don’t enter 0, 10 0, 1 a. Yes, the threat is credible b. No, the threat is not credible
PLEASE HOW TO THINK ABOUT IT AND SOLVE
In order to solve a game using the concept of iterated dominance, which of the following assumptions must hold? (check all that apply) players are risk neutral the players are rational the players know that cach other is rational the players know that each other knows each other is rational.
Consider the Normal Form Game characterized in the following figure: P1\P2 X Y Z A B с (1,1) (0,0) (-1,0) (0,0) (2,2) (0,0) (0,-1) (0,0) (3,3) Which is the Strictly Dominated Strategy for player 1? O (1,0,0) O (0,1,0) O (0,0,1) There are no strictly dominated strategies for player 1
Two firms compete in a single market (duopoly) with demand given by QD-60-P. The two firms have identical cost functions, C(q)=2q. Suppose firm 1 chooses its output first, following by firm 2 (Stackelberg model). In this case, firm 1 produces ✓ units and firm 2 produces ✓. Firm 1 earns ✓ units. The price in the market is ✓and firm 2 earns $ $ Does firm 1 have a first-mover advantage here?