Consider the case of a Sequential-Move game. UofC moves First Part 1. Is UofC 's sub-game Perfect Nash Equilibrium strategy Aggressive or Restrained? (Answer 1 for aggressive and 2 for Restrained) 1 Part 2. Is MRU's sub-game Perfect Nash Equilibrium strategy Aggressive or Restrained? (Answer 1 for aggressive and 2 for Restrained) Number Part 3. How much profit does UofC make under the Sub-game perfect Nash-Equilibrium? Number

Does each individual in a prisoners dilemma benefit more from cooperation or from pursuing self-interest? Explain briefly.

Sometimes oligopolies in the same industry are very different in size. Suppose we have a duopoly where one firm (Film A) is large and the other film (Film B) is small, as the prisoners dilemma box in Table 10.4 shows. Assuming that both films know the payoffs, what is the likely outcome in this case?

Jane and Bill are apprehended for a bank robbery. They are taken into separate rooms and questioned by the police about their involvement in the crime. The police tell them each that if they confess and turn the other person in, they will receive a fighter sentence. If they both confess, they will be each be sentenced to 30 years. If neither confesses, they will each receive a 20-year sentence. If only one confesses, the they will receive 15 years and the one who stayed silent will receive 35 years. Table 10.7 below represents the choices available to Jane and Bill. If Jane trusts Bill to stay silent, what should she do? If Jane thinks that Bill will confess, what should she do? Does Jane have a dominant strategy? Does Bill have a dominant strategy? A = Confess; B = Stay Silent. (Each results entry lists Janes sentence first (in years), and Bills sentence second.)