Consider an employee who does not receive employer-based health insurance and must divide her $10,000 per week in after-tax income between health insurance and "other goods." Draw this worker's opportunity set if the price of health insurance is $2,000 per week and the price of "other goods" is $1,000 per week. On the same graph, illustrate how the opportunity set would change if the employer agreed to give this employee $2,000 worth of health insurance per week (under current tax laws, this form of compensation is nontaxable). Would this employee be better or worse off if, instead of the health insurance, the employer gave her a $2,000 per week raise that was taxable at a rate of 25 percent? Explain.

Consider an income guarantee program with an income guarantee of $5,000 and a benefit reduction rate of 40%. A person can work up to 2,000 hours per year at $10 per hour. a. Draw the person’s budget constraint with the income guarantee. b. Suppose that the income guarantee rises to $7,500 but with a 60% reduction rate. Draw the new budget constraint c. Which of these two income guarantee programs is more likely to discourage work? Explain.   Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.

Question 2 of 5 Y 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 l total income per day. Consider the figure above and suppose the person has 7 hours per day to divide between labour and non-labour activities. A. If non-labour income is $0.50 per day, this individual will choose hours of work and will have $ hours instead and enjoy hours of leisure. Their income from labour will be $ B. If non-labour income increases to $2, they will work C. Comparing parts A and B above, the income elasticity of this person's labour is equal to hours of leisure. Their total income per day will now be $ (round to two decimal places) which is (elastic/inelastic). Now (ignoring the figure above) suppose aggregate labour supply is measured as aggregate number of hours worked (L) given wage (w). A. Graph the labour supply if L=5w. The (total) elasticity of labour supply is B. Graph the labour supply if L. = 14w. The (total) clasticity of labour supply is per day and they

Graphically illustrate the TANF example with a 2,000-hour constraint between work and leisure and a $10 per hour wage rate. Illustrate two cases in the same graph, a guaranteed benefit of $5,000 and $3,000 with a benefit reduction rate of 50% in both cases. Identify the case of Sarah who reduces leisure when the guaranteed benefit is reduced from $5,000 to $3,000.

Consider Ron’s demand for after school care for his children. The marginal benefit Ron receives for every hour of childcare is provided in the accompanying table. After school childcare(hours per day) Marginal benefit($ per hour) 1 $32 2 $30 3 $20 4 $14 a. If an hour of childcare costs $24, how many hours will Ron purchase each day? Assume Ron can only purchase care in one-hour increments (no partial hours).   b. If an hour of childcare costs $18, how many hours will Ron purchase each day? Assume Ron can only purchase care in one-hour increments (no partial hours).

Please do fast and add explanation and check answer properly.........

Simone likes peanut butter and jelly (PB&J) sandwiches. When Simone makes a PB&J sandwich she always uses 4 tablespoons of peanut butter and 2 tablespoons of jelly. Suppose that the price of peanut butter is $0.05 per tablespoon and that the price of jelly is $0.15 per tablespoon. Simone lives above a bakery and receives free day old bread from her baker friend. The amount of Simone's income spent on PB&J sandwiches is $8 a week. Which of the following statements is true? A. Simone's indifference curves for peanut butter and jelly are normal indifference curves. B. Simone's indifference curves for peanut butter and jelly are straight lines, since she always eats peanut butter and jelly in a particular combination. C. Simone's indifference curves for peanut butter and jelly each have a right angle, since peanut butter and jelly are perfect complements for Simone. D. Simone maximizes her utility from PB&J sandwiches by consuming 8 sandwiches a we O E. Answers (C) and (D) are both true.

Suppose a government program guarantees $ 2,000 a month in income, even for those who do not work at all. However, if the recipient earns income by working, the benefit is reduced by 50 cents for each $1 earned. Which of the following statements is true? This program will redefine the proverty line. While the goal may be to reduce poverty, people rarely respond to incentives. This program will reduce the incentive to work significantly. The goal of this program is to increase the incentive to work, reducing the poverty trap.

The paper is 50 of 50 Suppose that you have health insurance that covers all your healthcare expenditures. If you are rational, you will use medical care up to the point where your: The disutility of the illness is equal to the marginal benefit of healthcare. b. I do not want to answer this question. C Marginal benefit is equal to the total costs of providing the medical care. Marginal benefit is zero. e Total benefits are equal to the cost of your health care insurance.

Economics No needed to answer all these questions, but I'd greatly appriciate if you can answer as much as possbile. Thanks 1. Income insurance. Read Gerald Friedman, “Dog Walking and College Teaching: The Rise of the Gig Economy” a) Use diminishing marginal utility theory to explain why people would prefer stable income to receiving the same total income but with much more variation week to 3 week. b) Would it be desirable to provide workers with some other form of income security? Would you expect private insurance companies to sell such policies (e.g. unemployment insurance?) 2. Financial markets: efficient and other. a) What has happened to the profitability of financial firms in the US economy in recent decades and their profitability relative to other capitalist businesses? b) Would you expect financial firms to make excessive profits under conditions of perfect competition? Why then have financial firms been able to capture unusually high profits? 3. Equilibrium discrimination…