Consider a lake found in the town of Center Barnstead, and then answer the questions that follow. The town has a campground whose visitors use the lake for recreation. The town also has a fish cannery that dumps industrial waste into the lake. This pollutes the lake and makes it a less desirable vacation destination. That is, the fish cannery's waste decreases the campground's economic profit.        Suppose that the fish cannery could use a different production method that involves recycling water. This would reduce the pollution in the lake to levels safe for recreation, and the campground would no longer be affected. If the fish cannery uses the recycling method, then the fish cannery's economic profit is $1,500 per week, and the campground's economic profit is $1,800 per week. If the fish cannery does not use the recycling method, then the fish cannery's economic profit is $2,000 per week, and the campground's economic profit is $1,000 per week. These figures are summarized in the following table. Complete the following table by computing the total profit (the fish cannery's economic profit and the campground's economic profit combined) with and without recycling. Action Profit Fish Cannery  Campground Total (Dollars) (Dollars) (Dollars) No Recycling 2,000 1,000   Recycling 1,500 1,800   Total economic profit is highest when the recycling production method is    .   When the fish cannery uses the recycling method, the campground earns $1,800−$1,000=$800$1,800−$1,000=$800 more per week than it does with no recycling. Therefore, the campground should be willing to pay up to $800 per week for the fish cannery to recycle water. However, the recycling method decreases the fish cannery's economic profit by $2,000−$1,500=$500$2,000−$1,500=$500 per week. Therefore, the fish cannery should be willing to use the recycling method if it is compensated with at least $500 per week. Suppose the campground has the property rights to the lake. That is, the campground has the right to a clean (unpolluted) lake. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no cost, the fish cannery will    the recycling method and will pay the campground    per week.   Now, suppose the fish cannery has the property rights to the lake, including the right to pollute it. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no cost, the fish cannery will    the recycling method, and the campground will pay the fish cannery    per week.   The campground will make the most economic profit when    .   True or False: The lake will remain polluted, regardless of who has the property rights. True   False

Suppose the inverse demand curve on ore is given by P = X - 0.47 Q. Ore can be either mined or obtained through a recycling program. The marginal cost of mining is MC1 = 8 q1. The marginal cost of obtaining ore through recycling is MC2 = 91 + 2 q2. What should be a maximum value of X so that recycling is NOT cost-effective?

Exton and Shill are 2 firms that can control emissions at the following marginal costs: MC1 = 400q1, MC2 = 200q2, where q1 and q2 are the amount of emissions reduced by Exton and Shill, respectively. Assume that with no control at all, each firm would be emitting 25 units of emissions. Estimate the cost-effective allocation of emissions control needed if a total reduction of 30 units of emissions is necessary.

Please help me with this question ASAP

(A) Suppose that the two firms merge. Write down the profit function of the merged firm. Calculate the profit maximizing level of output, the amount of pollution for the merged firm, and its profit. Is the merger Pareto improvement? Why or why not? (B) Suppose that the merger is forbidden by the government. Instead, now the fishery has the property right to water. In other words, anybody who wants to pollute the water needs to buy a pollution right from the fishery. Let the price of the pollution right be Px. Write down the steel mill’s new profit function and the fishery’s new profit function. (C) Calculate the profit maximizing level of output for each firm, the amount of pollution, and the price of pollution right. please, please answer the three questions together..

Metropolitan Utilities District currently charges residents in Omaha $1.23 per cubic feet of water use for each home's first 900 cubic feet of water used, $1.73 per cubic feet of water use for each home's usage rate between 900 and 3,000 cubic feet, and $2.22 per cubic feet of water use for anything over 3,000 cubic feet of use. The pricing structure is an example of: over-use and inefficient pricing. too few water permits being traded on the local water market. block pricing. conservation pricing.

Many highways have designated car pool or highoccupancy lanes. Generally, only cars containing at least two people can use these lanes. Single drivers are fined heavily if they are caught using these lanes. With new technologies, it is possible to charge drivers using car pool lanes by recording identifying markings on the car and billing the owners. Would allowing single drivers to pay to use car pool lanes increase economic efficiency? Explain.  

3) A chemical company can produce Q units of a chemical H, with marginal costs of MC = 9 + Q. and can distribute the chemical at marketing marginal costs of MC = 1. The demand for His given by P = 30-1.5Q. If an external market exists where H can be bought or sold without marketing expenses for $13, how much H should the firm produce? 00 units 4 units 05 units 07 units 10 units

Consider the following table, describing each person's willingness to pay for different levels (units) mosquito control. Mosquito control is a public good for this society. Demand for Mosquito Control Person A Level WTP($) Person B Person C WTP($) WTP($) 10 25 16 15 20 20 14 12 30 15 12 8. 40 10 10 6. 50 5 8 3 The marginal cost of producing one unit of mosquito control is $35 and constant. Assuming there is no Free-Rider issue, the private level of mosquito control supplied would be units. The optimal level of mosquito control however, would be units.

Environmentalists in Tennessee brought suit against the Champion Paper Company of North Carolina for polluting the Pigeon River, which flows from North Carolina into eastern Tennessee. Tennessee claimed that the coffee-colored water smelled bad and would not support fishing or swimming. Environmentalists requested that the river be restored to its pristine state, or the water quality it had before the coming of industry. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) heard the suit and applied an efficiency standard. In other words, the EPA set limits on how much pollution the paper company could release (though this number was not zero). Adjust the following graph to indicate the negative externality. PRICE (Dollars per sheet) 2 1 10 9 Supply Demand 8 0 0 1 2 Demand 7 9 10 5 3 4 QUANTITY (Sheets of paper) Supply When the EPA imposes standards on the paper company, the quantity of paper produced will company will . The new equilibrium price is $ , and the price of paper from this per sheet…