Compute Liquidity and Solvency Ratios for Competing FirmsHalliburton and Schlumberger compete in the oil field services sector. Refer to the following 2018 financial data for the two companies to answer the requirements.$ millionsCash and equivalentsShort-term investmentsAccounts receivableCurrent assetsCurrent liabilitiesTotal liabilitiesTotal equityEarnings before interest and tax (EBIT)Interest expense, grossa. Compute the following measures for both companies.Note: Round your final answers to two decimal places (for example, enter 6.78 for 6.77555).1. Current ratio2. Quick ratio3. Times interest earned4. Liabilities-to-equityHAL SLB$2,008 $1,4331,3445,077 7,64511,151 15,7314,658 13,08116,438 33,9219,258 35,4882,393 2,959554537HAL2.28 x1.5 x4.54 x1.69 *SLB1.114 x0.79 x5.79 *0.91 xb. Which company appears more liquid? HALc. Which company appears more solvent? SLB =

Current ratio is a measure of liquidity. It shows whether the entity can pay the short-term debt…

Compute Liquidity and Solvency Ratios for Competing Firms Halliburton and Schlumberger compete in the oil field services sector. Refer to the following 2018 financial data for the two companies to answer the requirements. $ millions Cash and equivalents Short-term investments. Accounts receivable Current assets Current liabilities Total liabilities Total equity HAL SLB $2,008 $1,433 1,344 5,077 7,645 11,151 15,731 4,658 13,081 16,438 33,921 9,258 35,488 Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) 2,393 2,959 Interest expense, gross 554 537 a. Compute the following measures for both companies. Note: Round your final answers to two decimal places (for example, enter 6.78 for 6.77555). HAL 2.28 x 1.5 x 4.54 x 1.69 x SLB 1.114 x 0.79 x 5.79 x 0.91 x 1. Current ratio 2. Quick ratio 3. Times interest earned 4. Liabilities-to-equity b. Which company appears more liquid? HAL c. Which company appears more solvent? SLB ✔

Compute Liquidity and Solvency Ratios for Competing Firms Halliburton and Schlumberger compete in the oil field services sector. Refer to the following 2018 financial data for the two companies to answer the requirements. $ millions Cash and equivalents Short-term investments. Accounts receivable Current assets Current liabilities Total liabilities Total equity HAL SLB $2,008 $1,433 1,344 5,077 7,645 11,151 15,731 4,658 13,081 16,438 33,921 9,258 35,488 Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) 2,393 2,959 Interest expense, gross 554 537 a. Compute the following measures for both companies. Note: Round your final answers to two decimal places (for example, enter 6.78 for 6.77555). HAL 2.28 x 1.5 x 4.54 x 1.69 x SLB 1.114 x 0.79 x 5.79 x 0.91 x 1. Current ratio 2. Quick ratio 3. Times interest earned 4. Liabilities-to-equity b. Which company appears more liquid? HAL c. Which company appears more solvent? SLB ✔

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING

10th Edition

ISBN:9781259964947

Author:Libby

Publisher:Libby

Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1Q

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Explain the market value and if the company has a chance of success if they apply for a loan
Long-Term Solvency Analysis The following information was taken from Station Company's balance sheet: Fixed assets (net) $764,400Long-term liabilities 364,000Total liabilities 1,656,200Total stockholders' equity 1,274,000Determine the company's (a) ratio of fixed assets to long-term liabilities and (b) ratio of liabilities to stockholders' equity. If required, round your answers to one decimal place. a. Ratio of fixed assets to long-term liabilities fill in the blank 1b. Ratio of liabilities to stockholders' equity fill in the blank 2
The _________ is the internal rate of return a firm must earn on its investment in order to maintain the market value of its stock. a. gross profit margin b. IRR c. Cost of Capital d. net profit margin A snapshot from Violet Flowers Ltd.'s financial information reveals the following for years 2018 and 2019: Item 2018 2019 Long Term Debt $4,600,000 $4,900,000 Interest expense $600,500 $870,000 Dividends $400,000 $590,000 Common Stock $1,740,000 $1,815,000 Additional paid-in surplus $4,200,000 $4,500,000 Violet Flowers' FCF for 2019 was: a. $300,000 b. $515,000 c. $785,000 d. $270,000
You are an investment analyst at FI Investments tasked to value FBC firm a Southern Agricultural Conglomerate. The following financial information was recently released for FBC. The company’s 2018 and 2017 annual financial reports are contained in tables 1 and 2 below, along with important additional information: Table 1: FBC statement of financial position (R millions) 2018 2017 Cash and equivalents R149 R83 Accounts receivable 295 265 Inventory 275 285 Total current assets R719 R633 Total fixed assets 3 909 3 856 Accounts payable 228 220 Notes payable 0 0 Total current liabilities 228 220 Long term debt 1 800 1 650 Total liabilities and shareholders equity 3 909 3 856 Number of shares outstanding (millions) 100 100 Additional information: Depreciation (2018): R483. The firm spent R250m in profitable projects during the…
Calculate the ratios of Woolworths Group (Australian retail company) for the year 2021: Ratios to calculate: Profitability (ROSF, ROCE, Gross margin, Operating profit margin, Cash flow to Sales*) Efficiency (Inventory turnover period, Average settlement period, Sales revenue to capital employed) Liquidity (Current ratio, Acid test (quick) ratio, Cash flow ratio*). Stability/Capital Structure (Gearing ratio, Interest cover ratio, Debt coverage ratio*) Investment/Market Performance (Earnings per share, Price earnings ratio, Operating cash flow per share*)
If given the opportunity, in which of the firms would you invest based on the result of your analysis of both companies and the comparison with the industry? If you would not invest, explain your reasons according to the results obtained. Company Name: Year 2018 Chemicals and Allied Products Industry Ratios ………….. Solvency or Debt Ratios Merck J&J 2018 Debt ratio 0.67 0.61 0.47 Debt-to-equity ratio 0.93 0.51 0.38 Interest coverage ratio 12.27 18.91 -9.43 Liquidity Ratios Current ratio 1.17 1.47 3.47 Quick ratio 0.92 1.16 2.12 Cash ratio 0.40 0.63 2.24 Profitability Ratios Profit margin 14.64% 18.75% -93.4% ROE (Return on equity), after tax 23.03% 25.60% -248.5 ROA (Return on assets) 7.49% 10.00% -146.5 Gross margin 68.06% 66.79% 55.3% Operating margin (Return on sales) 19.62% 24.27%…
1. Calculate the cash operating cycle of Stone Limited for the year ended 30 April, 2018 and 2019.2. Calculate the comparative ratios for Stone limited for the year ended 30 April 2019. (to two decimal places where appropriate).3. Based on the result of the previous year end and the industry average. Draft a report addressed to the Board of Directors of Stone Limited analysing the performance of the company for the year 2019
You are an investment analyst at FI Investments tasked to value FBC firm a Southern Agricultural Conglomerate. The following financial information was recently released for FBC. The company’s 2018 and 2017 annual financial reports are contained in tables 1 and 2 below, along with important additional information: Table 1: FBC statement of financial position (R millions) 2018 2017 Cash and equivalents R149 R83 Accounts receivable 295 265 Inventory 275 285 Total current assets R719 R633 Total fixed assets 3 909 3 856 Accounts payable 228 220 Notes payable 0 0 Total current liabilities 228 220 Long term debt 1 800 1 650 Total liabilities and shareholders equity 3 909 3 856 Number of shares outstanding (millions) 100 100 Additional information: Depreciation (2018): R483. The firm spent R250m in profitable projects during the…
Long-Term Solvency Analysis The following information was taken from Station Company's balance sheet: Fixed assets (net) $1,881,600 Long-term liabilities 448,000 Total liabilities 2,038,400 Total stockholders' equity 1,568,000 Determine the company's (a) ratio of fixed assets to long-term liabilities and (b) ratio of liabilities to stockholders' equity. If required, round your answers to one decimal place. a. Ratio of fixed assets to long-term liabilities fill in the blank b. Ratio of liabilities to stockholders' equity fill in the blank
Compute Liquidity and Solvency Ratios for Competing Firms Halliburton and Schlumberger compete in the oil field services sector. Refer to the following 2018 financial data for the two companies to answer the requirements. $ millions Cash and equivalents Short-term investments Accounts receivable HAL SLB $2,008 $1,433 1,344 5,182 7,802 Current assets Current liabilities Total liabilities Total equity 11,151 15,731 4,754 13,351 16,438 33,921 9,449 36,220 Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) 2,442 3,020 Interest expense, gross 554 537 a. Compute the following measures for both companies. Note: Round your final answers to two decimal places (for example, enter 6.78 for 6.77555). HAL SLB 1. Current ratio 2.32 X 1.17 x 2. Quick ratio 1.5 x 0.68 * 3. Times interest earned 4.45 x 5.67 x 4. Liabilities-to-equity 1.7 x 0.92 x b. Which company appears more liquid? HAL c. Which company appears more solvent? SLB =>
Compute Liquidity and Solvency Ratios for Competing Firms Halliburton and Schlumberger compete in the oil field services sector. Refer to the following 2018 financial data for the two companies to answer the requirements. $ millions Cash and equivalents Short-term investments Accounts receivable Current assets Current liabilities Total liabilities Total equity Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) Interest expense, gross HAL SLB $2,008 $1,433 1,344 5,391 8,117 11,151 15,731 4,946 13.891 16,438 33,921 1. Current ratio 2. Quick ratio 3. Times interest earned 4. Liabilities-to-equity 9,830 37,684 2,541 3,142 554 537 a. Compute the following measures for both companies. Note: Round your final answers to two decimal places (for example, enter 6.78 for 6.77555). HAL SLB b. Which company appears more liquid? c. Which company appears more solvent? ◆
Evaluate the company's financial position and results of operation using the comparative statement analysis: i. Short-term solvency analysis ii. Long-term financial position analysis iii. Operating efficiency and profitability analysis