Compare product objectivity and process objectivity. Why it is important to try to achieve objectivity in scientific research?
Comparing product objectivity and process objectivity.
Product objectivity and process objectivity form two key parts of objectivity. The objectivity of both the product (entities of accurate representations of the world) and process (methods devoid of subjective views) are decisive for overall objectivity Science. The objectivity of the process is the basis of the scientific method used in ML. The the scientific method involves the development and acceptance or rejection of a scientific point of view through not whimsical and non-subjective criteria. Experiments based on rapidly developing according to Longino, the assumptions are not objective. Objectivity removes prejudice in its many forms such as cognitive or sampling biases as much as possible. 'Let nature speak for itself" may be the nineteenth-century equivalent of "letting the model speak for itself" today in ML. This is because the performance rating of a given model will to show whether it is biased or not, as witnessed in some state-of-the-art (SotA) models. Objectivity should make us act in a certain way, just like subjectivitywe behave in certain ways. What we know from experience is usually not separated from how we came to know it or is transmitted or learned through existing natural means. So to what extent it can be objective, it is often relative. Haraway is of the opinion that persecution objectivity in which the subject is completely cut off from the object is an illusion. She,
therefore, it calls for a balance where there will be faithful descriptions of object and object perspective of the subject so that the subject takes responsibility. This is more like it sociological factors and the apparatus of science are prospective. It was argued in literature that this perspectival attribute of the facts of science which makes absolute
Objectivity (of the process) is unlikely, so it is essential to have an active community (including her peer-review mechanism) that leads to how best to achieve objectivity. Regards to the objectivity of the product, when fact (data), and only fact, determines our beliefs, we they are objective. However, Longino states that it needs to be carefully considered the reliability of what actually constitutes that fact.
Objectivity cannot be associated with ethics. It is important to be objective in order to say that a person acted ethically, at least from the point of view of deontological ethics. Ethics research that studies ethical issues and issues that arise from leadership research enables the research community to provide guidelines for the ethical conduct of research. This is important for reproducibility of experimental results, where the facts should matter.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
