Choose one of the following prompts to answer in format. 1. In recent years, there has been a call among some United States voters to abolish the electoral college. Do you think that the United States should continue to use the electoral college, or do you think that the electoral college should be abolished? Why? Explain your position using concepts and examples from the textbook, class slides, and videos below. If you think the electoral college system should continue to be used to select the President of the United States, do you think any changes need to be made to the system? If you think the electoral should be abolished, what system do you think should take its place? 2. The topic of judicial selection has long been a source of contention among political theorists. Proponents of judicial appointment argue that appointment insulates judges from public opinion, thus removing the partisan pressures faced by politicians. Proponents of judicial elections argue that electing judges is the more democratic option, and point to empirical evidence suggesting that judges often behave in a partisan manner regardless of whether they are appointed or elected, so they should just be elected. Which do you think is the better option- appointing or electing judges? Why? How does this relate to the concepts of judicial restraint and judicial activism? Make sure to address opposing arguments in your essay.

Related questions

Question

100%

Choose one of the following prompts to answer in format. 1. In recent years, there has been a call among some United States voters to abolish the electoral college. Do you think that the United States should continue to use the electoral college, or do you think that the electoral college should be abolished? Why? Explain your position using concepts and examples from the textbook, class slides, and videos below. If you think the electoral college system should continue to be used to select the President of the United States, do you think any changes need to be made to the system? If you think the electoral should be abolished, what system do you think should take its place? 2. The topic of judicial selection has long been a source of contention among political theorists. Proponents of judicial appointment argue that appointment insulates judges from public opinion, thus removing the partisan pressures faced by politicians. Proponents of judicial elections argue that electing judges is the more democratic option, and point to empirical evidence suggesting that judges often behave in a partisan manner regardless of whether they are appointed or elected, so they should just be elected. Which do you think is the better option- appointing or electing judges? Why? How does this relate to the concepts of judicial restraint and judicial activism? Make sure to address opposing arguments in your essay.

Expert Solution

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here